Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage bed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of BDSM equipment. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bondage bed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be independently notable. No references demonstrate this to me. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Bondage equipment. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and reference better lots of GNews hits. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge no refs Someone65 (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the refs pointed to by the GNews seem to be passing mentions of "a bed where bondage happens." At best, those sources would support a dicdef article only. Currently the article is only a transwiki from Wipipedia, so no information would truly be lost in a Delete. But If someone were to prove me wrong and pull off a WP:HEY then I would be all for keep. -- RoninBK _{T C} 08:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. RoninBK _{T C} 08:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I only saw casual mentions of the bondage bed in the 21 Google news results, but Google books shows 100 results. Obviously this is something that would be covered in detail in books about sex. Dream Focus 13:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Bondage equipment. Not enough coverage to warrant its own article. SnottyWong ^squeal 17:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of bondage equipment. No sources and no indication of significant coverage in independent sources. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.