Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Miles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. JayJay^{Talk to me} 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

100 Miles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short stubby article which movie is not notable. JayJay^{Talk to me} 17:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. It won the "best non-documentary film award at the Emirates Film competition in 2007 and was an Official Selection of the Emirati Voices section at the Dubai International Film Festival (2008)"[1]. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was a two-sentence stub when nominated... but so what? Stub class is more a reson to expand articles, rather than delete them. The article is now a sourced start-class that will benefit from regular editing.[2] Deletion here does not improve the project. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note the Find sources created by an AFD template is not always as helpful as could be hoped. I find it useful to expand on searches using what an article provides mixed with a toch of common sense. IE:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well then this nomination was clearly beneficial, not only did it save the article but it did improve it. For that reason I Withdraw my nomination JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to assist. Addressing concerns took very little time. A withdrawal is always appreciated and was done here with courtesy and consideration. And with the withdrawal, anyone swinging by can close this now. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.