User talk:TVexpert

Welcome to Wikipedia. Hello, TVexpert, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

--ΜιĿːtalk 10:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please cite your references for the Brian Cooke article you started? I cannot find anything online which lists when or where this particular Brian Cooke was born. RFerreira 22:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Cooke's DOB was NOT extracted from any particular source. I am simply aware that he was born in 1937 - I read this in a writer's guild book which profiled many leading writers but cannot (many years later) recall the name of the book or its publisher. But believe me, the DOB given is correct!

A {{afd}} tag has been placed on [[:{{{1}}}]], requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. All Wikipedians can join the debate at Articles for deletion, where articles asserted to be inappropriate to Wikipedia are discussed. You are encouraged to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{{1}}}|submit your opinion]], and remember that Articles for Deletion debates are not a vote. You can also leave a note on [[Talk:{{{1}}}|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the deletion tag yourself, but don't feel inhibited from editing the article, particularly if doing so makes it clear that it is a useful contribution to an encyclopaedia.

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Leah Charles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 12:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ros Wood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 18:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nick Jackson (voice over), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

BLP with no references meeting Wikipedia's standards for WP:N inclusion, just a single external link to subject's own site

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hellno2 (talk) 23:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TVexpert! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 12 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 669 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Briony Behets - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Barry Hill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Tim Fornara - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Tommy Sandhu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Don Battye - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Tony McHale - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Shaunna O'Grady - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Chris Adshead - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Stanley Appel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Adele Rose - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ros Wood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has received no coverage at all in reliable sources that I can find.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences&Windows 00:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sara Damergi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability beyond presenting A Place in the Sun, also iniquitously written.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Launchballer 00:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Damergi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Damergi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 00:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Fornara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Fornara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 01:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]