User talk:Spidersmilk

Hello, Spidersmilk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Frank O. Bastian, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shalir Salim (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Frank O. Bastian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shalir Salim (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

ClueBot is not back up and running. In fact it hasn't edited in some 5 years.--5 albert square (talk) 13:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spidersmilk (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Hi albert square, Mabe i was wrong, mabe clueBot is not running now, however checking history of Prion and Biobattery reveal that Cluebot was active in 2014, one year ago.^[1] Could you please explain what is going on?[reply]

Ah that is User: ClueBot NG, not User: ClueBot. ClueBot is no longer operational having being replaced by ClueBot NG.--5 albert square (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spidersmilk (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC) I see albert square, so mabe that page should be deleted, unless ClueBot may become active again in the future.[reply]

Hi, I suppose ClueBot may be back at some point if (to quote ClueBot) "special heuristics" allow that. However, that page will need to remain for reference purposes. Apart from anything else, I put a bright red notice at the top of the page stating that ClueBot is no longer operational, and ClueNet also removed disabled the false positive link some time ago anyway.--5 albert square (talk) 00:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Α-Synuclein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeemNarduni2 I am trying to creat a redirect page for Alpha Synuclein i intend to move it so that someone can type in A Synuclein and get to Alpha SynucleinSpidersmilk (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this was certainly an unusual way to create a redirect. But I've fixed it now, and thanks for the thanks. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Matheson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Am Legend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spidersmilk! Are we sure on the spelling for the Alberta river? Parks Canada uses "Riviere Des Rochers". I couldn't find refs for the "Roches" spelling. Regards, The Interior (Talk) 18:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Familial spongiform encephalopathy associated with a new prion protein gene mutation to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Familial spongiform encephalopathy associated with a new prion protein gene mutation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HyperGaruda (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —PC-XT+ 12:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your other test template to {{User:Spidersmilk/Template:Lump}} because it appears to be in use. Cheers! —PC-XT+ 11:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spidersmilk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rivière des Rochers, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new categories is tricky, because filling them up often involves editing numerous (highly visible) articles. Those articles can be categorized in hundreds of ways, and we should choose only some (basic, stable, not violating WP:NPOV, etc.). Typically a category created in a rush is deleted by the community, with the concomitant removal of it from all affected articles. This annoys editors by cluttering watchlists. It is always a good idea to discuss creation of a new category in advance, at the relevant Wikiprojects. Materialscientist (talk) 02:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tulare Lake may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• River]]<br>[[Kern River]]<br> [[Kings River (California)|Kings River]]<br> [[Tule River]]<br>[[White River (California)|White River]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Page. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spidersmilk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Spidersmilk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wizard of Oz (1939 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juliette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spidersmilk. You have new messages at Jimbo Wales's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, thanks for starting the article on End stage pulmonary disease. Please note that when alternative titles are in bold it's because they are the targets of redirects pointing to the page, so that people landing there can quickly see why. So as well as bolding the alternative title, please create a redirect from it (or hatnote, or disambiguation page entry). I've just created redirects from End stage lung disease and ESLD, and made a new disambiguation page at ESPD. All this helps the reader to find the article, and reduces the risk of another editor accidentally creating a duplicate article through not finding this one - in this case someone else might have searched for End stage lung disease, not spotted it, and started work. Thanks. PamD 09:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But the dab page you created at ESLD was not valid, as End stage liver disease is not mentioned in the article Cirrhosis. PamD 23:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect End stage liver disease. Since you had some involvement with the End stage liver disease redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 23:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC) User:PamD The reason for changing ESLD is because ESLD, if you look it up, is usually taken to mean End stage liver disease, for that reason, End stage pulmonary disease is the preferred name, although both are used. Here is an example ^[1]Spidersmilk (talk) 02:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another example^[2]

But there is no article or mention in this encylopedia about end stage liver disease, so no need for the redirect.PamD 06:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Talk:Transgender, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [1] EvergreenFir (talk) 03:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and people associated with the same, all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

For your edits like this and the one linked above. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have some questions I would like to ask. please be patient and just answer them as i ask themSpidersmilk (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• User:EvergreenFir how is "Transgender" a BLP article? Transgender is not a person.

• And why are you instantly talking about blocking me after one or two edits to gender pages?

• why was the editor who started the conversation given an indefinite block without previous shorter blocks as wiki normally does?

• and how was what he did "trolling", he just asked if he could add content to the article based on his ref. I have seen other people do that and not get anything other than "add that" or "don't add that", like on the Mycoplasma article in the cancer section. That is what talk pages are for, it helps to decide what to add.

• Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy, wouldn't adding info about how Transgender-ism might be a mental illness or at least be related somehow with co-morbidity make the article more neutral (given that refs to reliable journals are given)

• Isn't a talk page to discuss what the content of an article should be, and, if so, can't it be used to ask if content should be added based on a particular ref (is it reliable or not). Wasn't that what I and the other editor were doing?

• Why not just say "don't add that to the article, the ref is not reliable enough" on that talk page instead of talking about blocking, makes me wonder if Wiki is really about neutrality and encyclopedic information or political propaganda.

Seems to me there is a huge bias here on Wikipedia and that conversation really opened my eyes to just how liberal and political Wiki might actually be.

Notes: Many so called conspiracy theories like New World Order are no longer fringe, and most Americans now think JFK was shot by deep state (which I agree with). Most Americans no longer believe in man made Global Warming either after the emails were leaked from corrupt scientists and businessmen in Europe. I actually find it offensive that Wiki classifies Global Warming Skepticism aka "Denialism" under "Pseudoscience", the same category that includes the Flat Earth Society, comparing the flat earth society to global warming skeptics is like comparing the Mississippi River to the creek you find in someones backyard or comparing The Germ theory of disease to the theory that aliens seeded earth with life.

Is this a reliable source on transgender being a possible mental illness?^[1]

Soros is a living person. I'm not an admin do I can answer your questions about another user's block. Your nonsense about NWO such is disruptive to say the least.

Stop. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EvergreenFir thanks for explaning, now what is a wiki talk page for? maybe I had it wrong. If I am, let me know. I always thought it was about what an article should say.

It's for improving the article, however talk pages are not exempt from rules regarding biographies of living persons. They are all from that places to promote or espouse nonsense, spew polemics, conduct hate speech, etc. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EvergreenFir Ok thanks, I honestly had no idea that the BLP thing also applied to talk pages as well, because a lot of stuff on talk pages are taken with a grain of salt until you read the refs. I have seen lots of nonsense written on talk pages over the years.Spidersmilk (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also see what you mean about the source I offered: according to Wiki, Hindawi is questionable.Spidersmilk (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm R9tgokunks. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Gokunks (Speak to me) 23:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R9tgokunks, I was taking the advise of another user, to remove part of what I said as they said it only undermined the strength of my vote.SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, read all of my edits to that talk page, you will see what I mean, it was constructive as far as I can tell. I was only removing the conversation between myself and the other user after I took their advise, it took up room and clouded the descussion SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't asking you to delete your comments, Spidersmilk, I was explaining a problem with your argument. If you had decided that you agree with what I said, you could have added a note saying you've changed your mind, or best yet, used <s></s> tags to strike out parts of your comments you don't stand by anymore. Like this. It's considered very inappropriate to remove or alter any other editor's comments in almost all cases.

Even when things go off on a tangent, as our discussion did, it's best not to change the course of discussion at all. I've seen it before, and even the most well-intentioned changes often make it confusing for someone who hasn't been a part of the discussion to follow along. That being said, there are no hard feelings.

One final note: I notice that you're not indenting properly. Whenever you reply to a comment, you should indent your reply one level further than that comment, to preserve and show the flow of discussion. You can accomplish this by putting one or more colons (:) at the beginning of each line of your reply. The number of colons you use indicates the level of indentation. When things get too far indented, you can use the {{outdent}} template to bring things back to the left, while preserving the flow. Check out this page for a demonstration of how to do proper indenting. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:MPants at work I see now, how do you get that kind of crossing out with the keyboard, i have never figured out how to do that.SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:MPants at work nevermind, I think I figured it outSpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 15:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have given you a straightforward example. Though I know you don't need it any more, here it is suuuuper late for future reference, or the benefit of anyone else needing it.

Typing this: <s>Struck out text.</s>

will produce this: Struck out text.

Now please work on using the indenting that I mentioned. I'll watch your page so that I can see if you have any questions. Please, ask away, and don't worry if you're bothering me. I thoroughly enjoy helping people out. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 18:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is apropos of nothing really but I just spotted your user name on another page and it made me laugh out loud, and I thought you might find this story amusing. About 15 years ago when the Internet was still wearing short trousers there was a website - Answers.com (it still exists) - that in those days anyone could edit, and it often featured at the top of Google searches. My friend and I fixed it so that anybody who googled "how heavy is a spider" was directed to a spoof page that we'd created, which stated:

Whilst the Appalachian forest spider can weigh as little as 0.1 milligrams when fully grown, the Alaskan wooly-back log spider weighs in at a whopping 2.5 ounces! Giving birth to only one spiderling in any given season, the wooly-back has the largest birth canal in the spider kingdom, and it's half-ounce young can suckle upto 3 grams of milk in one sitting!

The fact that it remained at the top spot on Google searches for about 3-4 years amused us immensely, and even after it was knocked off the top spot it was still the top answer when you googled "how heavy is a spider at birth" for a couple of years. Apparently the mixing of metric and imperial units wasn't enough to tip anyone off, nor was the fact that spiders don't give birth to live young. Doing a quick search just now it turns out that our contribution is still online! It's been refactored, but the only material change to the text seems to have been to replace the exclamation mark with a full stop. So funny! nagualdesign 04:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:nagualdesign did you check my userpage to see how I came up with that name from the goats that make spider silk in their milk?SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 12:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. I remember when they first made those goats. Incredible stuff. nagualdesign 13:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...I wonder if they ever tried doing it the other way around, creating spiders that produced goat's milk instead of silk. I reckon you could produce some of the world's most expensive artisan cheeses for billionaire connoisseurs. nagualdesign 21:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too funny, and disgusting!SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 22:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:nagualdesign Haha Spiders do not have birth canals.SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They do suckle milk though, right? They're basically like little mammals with 8 legs, aren't they. nagualdesign 22:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the Alaskan wooly-back log spider really does exist, I would like it if you would send me a reliable source about it.SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 23:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to get back to you on that. nagualdesign 11:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spidersmilk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Generally we stick with high quality review articles rather than primary source for medical articles per WP:MEDRS Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spidersmilk

Thank you for creating McIvor River.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Could really use a map and more material. Your source has material which could be used. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O3000, thanks for the warning, I read the reply to my question, and other people have asked the same thing many, many, many times.SpidersMilk, Drink Spider Milk, it tastes good. (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dishonest press. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 6#Dishonest press until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 04:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prion diseases/sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WMSR (talk) 00:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]