User talk:NotAnOmbudsman

Hello Wikiombudsman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dolomedes albineus for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. _Musa^Talk 02:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wikiombudsman. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikiombudsman, I just wanted to pass on a couple of pieces of information while I'm here. First of all, I declined the speedy-deletion nomination mentioned above on this page for what are probably obvious reasons. Thank you for your recent page creations on spiders!

Secondly, it seems that no one has said anything yet, but we do have a username policy that does not allow usernames that might mislead or confuse others, including names that sound like positions of authority. "Wikiombudsman" sounds an awful lot like an official position. You can simply create a new account, but since you already have quite a few good edits and might not want to lose them, you can also look here for instructions on how to request a change of username. If you have any questions you can leave me a message or reply here. Thanks! Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Can I change my name to UnofficialWikiOmbudsman then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiombudsman (talk • contribs)

Yes, though if I were going to suggest a name I'd go with something a little less impersonal-sounding - even things that are OK policy-wise can sound a bit strange on a talk page :) Name changes to names not already claimed should be requested here.

BTW, when you post on a talk page you should end your post with four tildes (~~~~), which will be automatically substituted with your signature. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I noticed this response to your username change request - that makes three people who think that your new username is still on the borderline and that you should choose something else. Comments like this aren't helping to make the case for it.

This wasn't an urgent matter when it looked like you were just creating some stubs, but you've also been cleanup-tagging articles and proposing them for deletion. Other editors working on those articles need to know who they're interacting with, and your username gives them the wrong impression. You need to change your username to something acceptable before doing any more maintenance work. I'm sorry this wasn't noticed earlier, but please note that this account could be blocked from editing altogether for violating the username policy if the problem isn't fixed. Thanks. Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not really happy with "Unofficial..." either, but I suppose that's OK. Please change your name quickly. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This guy might interest you: James Campbell (historian)‎ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiombudsman (talk • contribs)

Thanks. By the same token, Alfred Clapham. Drmies (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saw a new article by you & considered reporting your username to Wikipedia:uaa (usernames for admin attention). You really do need to change tis name, & I think merely adding"unofficial" before the name cuts no mustard.TheLongTone (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I have requested a new username. Wikiombudsman (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, saw that you had requested this after I posted. Didn't know the admin wheels ground so slowly! Sorry if I came across like a heavy handed parent & welcome to Wikipedia!TheLongTone (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I didn't mean any harm. Hopefully it will get sorted out soon. Wikiombudsman (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ferruccio Ferrazzi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. | Naypta^talk opened his mouth at 05:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I sound like I'm picking on you, but this speedy tag does not meet the A7 criteria, as it makes credible claims of significance. Speedy criteria are intentionally very narrow. You should really concentrate on getting more experience before doing this kind of work. There is a good summary of common deletion errors here if you want to read it. Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the claim of significance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiombudsman (talk • contribs)

Being president of a national organization and receiving a national award are more than enough to meet the minimal criteria defined by A7. Even if the nation is Luxembourg. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wgolf. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Phil Gray (artist), and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Working on it. Wikiombudsman (talk) 01:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Jonah Bryson directed to The Fight For Bala? Can this please be undone? It makes no sense to link a person to a film, and it does not let people learn about the individual. MrBean65 (talk) 01:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the person didn't say anything that isn't said in the film. And the person's only claim to notability is the film. So they don't have independent notability. By redirecting readers can still find information on them until such time as they establish notability apart from the film project. Wikiombudsman (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Music of Panama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• en español]]'' scene has produced such groups as [[Orquesta Garash]], [[Radicales Libres]]<ref>[[http://www.radicaleslibresweb.com/]</ref>, [[Filtro Medusa]], [[Skamilonga]], [[Los Rabanes]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this message?

You've continued to add cleanup tags, question other users' edits, and tag articles for deletion. Those are all good things, but you cannot continue to do them with a misleading username. Your next edit should be to post a new username in your CHU request or you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested a username change a day or two ago. Wikiombudsman (talk) 11:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and you were asked to choose something else. There is consensus here that "unofficial" doesn't fix the issue. This is not going to work. Please choose a username that has nothing to do with ombudspeople and request it at CHU ASAP. Opabinia regalis (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with "UnauthorizedWikiOmbudsman" which I requested yesterday? Wikiombudsman (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Opabinia regalis. It still implies that somehow you are connected to the Ombudsman commission. Wikimedia Foundation staff sometimes maintain separate accounts, one for actions they are taking in their "official" capacity and one for actions that are not "official", or "authorized" by the WMF. "UnauthorizedWikiOmbudsman" might confuse other users into believing the same. Why not choose a username without "Ombudsman" in it? You seem to be interested in clothing, so maybe you could rename yourself User:Vestitus (that's Latin for clothing). That's just a suggestion, of course you are free to think of other appropriate names.

Also, if you resume tagging articles for speedy deletion, please remember to notify the page author. Enabling the software Twinkle can help speed up the process. Good luck! Altamel (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. How about "NotaWikiOmbudsman"? Wikiombudsman (talk) 18:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be best to drop the ombudsman thing. Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Altamel for the ping; I thought I had posted the comment below already, but I seem to have run into that session data loss problem that's been going around.

Wikiombudsman: K6ka, who is a global renamer, replied to your request with the comment that "UnofficialWikiOmbudsman" was still too close for their taste, and "UnauthorizedWikiOmbudsman" does not resolve that concern. In case you didn't see K6ka's link, the m:Ombudsman Commission is a group that oversees privacy policy matters for the Wikimedia Foundation, which implies a very high level of trust and is important not to confuse people about. (I did initially think "Unofficial" was ok, if not a good idea, but the people who work with renames of existing contributors are often more stringent than admins deciding whether to block a new account.)

Also, I suggest creating a new CHU request to be sure it doesn't get overlooked in the queue. Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I processed a rename to "NotAnOmbudsman" (since it was better than "Wikiombudsman") but if someone still doesn't like the "Ombudsman" in there, please do feel free to file an WP:RFC/N for wider comment in which case @NotAnOmbudsman: you may still need to choose a different name without the word "ombudsman". –xeno^talk 17:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Phil Gray (artist)

added links pointing to Washington State, Cedar, Salish and Haida

Bridgewater Jerry

added a link pointing to Derwent Valley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you with this diff asked if Fabio Ceschi was fully professional because he playes in his league. That is not true. According to WP:NFOOTBALL (notability for footballers) they have to have played in a fully proffessional league seen in the list at WP:FPL. The league in San Marino is no fully professional so the player is not notable. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me at my talkpage. Qed237 (talk) 12:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. My question was whether that league was fully professional. It looked like it, but I am not an expert which is why I asked. Thanks. Wikiombudsman (talk) 12:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then I must have misunderstood your question. Anyway as I said all professional leagues are listed in WP:FPL. Have a nice day! Qed237 (talk) 12:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Anactinotrichida, Wikiombudsman!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please include a {{Taxobox}} in all taxon articles. A good shortcut is to copy the Taxobox of a related group and change the specific details.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Aptostichus simus, Wikiombudsman!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

In addition to taxoboxes, please place your articles into at least one relevent category. Note stub categories are not manually added but auto-generated by templates such as {{spider-stub}}.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, I'm Mabalu. Wikiombudsman, thanks for creating Soccus!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please can you add references to this article and maybe expand it a little?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mabalu (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating so many articles on historical clothing subjects. Please can you make sure to add citations and references to your stubs and try to remember to add relevant categories? Mabalu (talk) 17:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mardiros Altounian, Wikiombudsman!

Wikipedia editor Jorm just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello! I have marked your new article, Mardiros Altounian, as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Jorm's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scuola Libera del Nudo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scuola Libera del Nudo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NotAnOmbudsman. Concerns have been raised about your username. You can contribute to the discussion about it at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm I dream of horses. NotAnOmbudsman, thanks for creating Baadarâne!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If I hadn't needed to tag each and every one of the pages you've created that I've encountered, I might've considered nominating you for the autoreviewed right.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 04:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I love, loooove, loooooove what you did to architecture in lebanon. It was one my to do list but ive been away! amazing job! -Elias Z 13:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Lebanese articles is most impressive. Thank you for the very kind words. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re:

---

• in the Aftimus article I originally wrote "neo-mauresque" i don't remember ever writing "Arabo-mauresque" it must be some later edit. I will change it back tomorrow.

Would it be okay to use Moorish Revival? I think it is more commonly understood and more widely used although neo-mauresque might be more uniquely Lebanese as Francophone terminology. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked your reply :) that's exactly what I did! You are totally right, the term is not very common outside the Francosphere. It also appears that "Arabo-Mauresque" is my doing after all :S -Elias Z 10:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I tend not to use diacritics unless the word in question is in a foreign language and cannot be written otherwise. This is not the case for Lebanese Arabic. The general rule is to follow the way the word is written in the cited sources. To ensure that an article title is read correctly it is best to use IPA templates. Rf: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Pronunciation and Help:IPA for Arabic. If you are referring to the Baadarane article, I'd lose the circumflex but it's not a big deal as I have noticed that you have redirected pages with alternate spelling and without the diacritic to the article.

There certainly seem to be a lot of variants on spellings which I guess makes sense given the various languages in use and issues of transliteration.. I try to redirect so subjects can be found and duplicates are not created. :) I favor diacritics if they provide info on the proper pronunciation even if the average reader may not find them useful. But in the Lebanese context it's hard for me to tell which language is the one of origin or primary usage. Is it usually Arabic? SO diacritics would be appropriate for readers of Arabic in English translation?

Diacritics DO make pronounciation easier for both English and Arabic speakers. For the Lebanese and Arab readers, the inclusion of the foreign language equivalent in the artcile (in our case arabic) is always favorable and is recommended as per the Lead section manual of style. -Elias Z 10:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I will try to look into the Sehnaoui article tomorrow. The only way to establish a person's notability is through citing a good number of fairly reliable sources but I'm sure you know that already. There was a challenge during one Wikipedia MENA conference to start articles for obscure people or subjects and I managed to bring back Myriam Klink after many deletions when started by other users. Another factor is the user's credibility, keep a good record with consistent editing and I believe any article you start will have better chances to remain.

No rush. Seems an interesting guy anyway. I read the deletion discussion. I think he's notable.

I am so so so glad to have someone to talk to here. It's been sooooo long! Enjoy editing and please come back to me for any inquiry. When did you start editing? Did you used to edit anonymously ? GN_Elias Z 21:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help where I can. Sometimes I get confused. But I try. :) NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are invaluable! Keep on! And above all just have fun. Find your niche and enjoy it. There's a lot of satisfaction raising articles from nothingness to be Featured. Find one with potential and i can help you with it. -Elias Z 10:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is your area of expertise? _Elias Z 10:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Archaeology of Lebanon

added links pointing to Ottoman and Phoenician

Rashidya

added a link pointing to Palestinian

Tyre Coast Nature Reserve

added a link pointing to Phoenician

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Tarhal inquiry Elias Z 16:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NotAnOmbudsman,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Dakhira should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakhira .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think populated places are eligible for deletion. source. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to help with Ras Abrouq and Umm Tais if you can show me where they are on the map. When I google Ras Abrouq it takes me to Doha. ubiquity (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ras Abrouq seems also to go by the name Bir Zekreet or Zikreet.. Let me see if I can find a map or some GPS coordinates.. I also see note of a fort in the area. Ras Abrouq seems to be what the beach in the area goes by I think.. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies necessary at all, you clearly created the article(s) in good faith. It would be a good idea, however, to keep in mind the distinctions between a national park and a settlement. I am unsure on the notability criteria for national parks, but I think that they probably would require more references than a settlement in order to establish their notability. I could be wrong about this. At any rate, I'm not sure how many national park articles you created, but please do aptly rename them all to "X National Park" instead of just "X". I'm going to rename Umm Tais since the name refers exclusively to a national park. I will also add some content to Ras Abrouq since it is an important geographical and historical site. Thanks for your contributions, nonetheless. I'd be glad to oblige any content-related questions or further assistance should you require it. Elspamo4 (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National parks here in the U.S. are quite different from those called national parks in the Middle East, where the natural reserves are also used for natural areas that are often inhabited. So I am hesitant to put "..National Park" in the title unless it is a clear and official designation. As best I can tell these area are "natural reserves", but it's not clear to me exactly what being called a natural reserve designates or what geographic boundaries are included. Are the settlements part of the reserves? NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most national parks in the Middle East (or Qatar, at least) are named after the settlements in which they are located. So yes, quite different from the US. The national parks aren't actually part of the settlements or vice versa. That wouldn't be possible. Put simply, national parks are protected areas with no human population. Settlements are the exact opposite. Elspamo4 (talk) 18:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finishing the list of protected areas in Qatar. I've renamed Umm Tais to Umm Tais National Park, fyi. Elspamo4 (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed links to US natural reserves that have "lebanon" in their names. as for the other list, I am not interested in editing private company articles nor listing them. Elias Z 13:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to break this to you but there is no locale called Ariz or Arz. Its a colloquially used term for the area around Becharre and the cedar groves.

When i doubt consult Localiban for official spelling of lebanese townships.

Here's a table showing all of the towns in Becharre district.

'	Municipalités	Caza	Mohafazah
1	Aabdine	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
2	Bazaaoun	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
3	Bcharreh	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
4	Berhalioun	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
5	Bqaa Kafra	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
6	Bqerqacha	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
7	Hadath Ej Joubbeh	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
8	Hadchit	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
9	Hasroun	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
10	Qnat	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord
11	Tourza	Bcharreh	Liban-Nord

-Elias Z 14:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Are you sure? It shows up on maps. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 14:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also please have a look at Dhal Al Misfir, Rachidiye refugee camp, Fneidik and Hotel St. George, Beirut. Thanks! NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 14:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create articles based on maps. If you find official and reliable sources do it. Otherwise just don't. I have nominated Ariz for speedy deletion. Tarhal is next. Elias Z 14:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a quite notable and well established ski resort. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tarhal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Elias Z 14:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Liuba Maria Hevia. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Kevin12xd (contribs) 16:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, but I didn't create that article. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NotAnOmbudsman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Al Rashidiya (Lebanon) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. RobertsBiology (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected to the existing article and merged some content. Take care. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robert Eyles Egerton, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wdl.org/en/item/11437/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello COrenSearchBot. I believe the description is from the Library of Congress who uploaded the photo to Wikipedia Commons with that text? And I think that's where the World Digital Library got its info? I have removed the bulk of the text from the article out of caution. If the description is not public domain it should be removed from Wikipedia Commons as well.. but this is a series of public domain photos from the Library of Congress and I think the descriptions are public as well. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shagai Plateau, also referred to as Shagai Heights is an area of flat lands along the Khyber Pass. Fort Al Creator was nearby. The ascent to the Shagai Plateau begins near the entrance to the Khyber Pass from the southeast at Peshawar in what is now Pakistan. It was the site of a British encampment during the Second Anglo-Afghan War

Hi there - just a heads up that I have moved your recent question at the Teahouse from the bottom of the page to the top. Most talk pages require that new discussions be placed at the bottom of the page. At the Teahouse, however, new questions are placed at the top to maximize visibility. On another sidenote, your question regarding photo cropping was answered as you typed your new question :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 20:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SuperHamster. For some reason I wasn't able to use the automated tools to submit a question. Thanks very much for your assistance. I'm enjoying my wanders through Anglo-Afghan War late 19th century photos.. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NotAnOmbudsman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Afghan clothing for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Human3015 knock knock • 21:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ali Masjid page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geology of Armenia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://countrystudies.us/armenia/20.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Indian Medical Service

added links pointing to Armenian and Venetian

Ras Abrouq

added links pointing to Ubaid and Barbar

Aitanite

added a link pointing to Beqaa

Cucurbăta Mare

added a link pointing to Bihor

Cymbopogon commutatus

added a link pointing to Riyal

Darbar (title)

added a link pointing to Baluch

Goris

added a link pointing to Zangezur

Izeh

added a link pointing to Shahsavar

Kabul River

added a link pointing to Bala Hissar

Kurram Valley Field Force

added a link pointing to Ayub Khan

List of birds of East Timor

added a link pointing to Flycatcher

List of companies of Lebanon

added a link pointing to Arak

Mughal clothing

added a link pointing to Qamar ud-Din

Natural areas of Qatar

added a link pointing to Salwa

Nowruz Khani

added a link pointing to Gilani

Riad Salameh

added a link pointing to FSB

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I see we both were working on these articles at the same time, resulting in a duplicate. You appear to be more familiar with the subject matter; which title would be recommended? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jo-Jo Eumerus. I think there is a way to determine which name is more widely held and established (for example via Google search results) but I am not in the know for how to get those results. As best I can tell Arailer seems to be at least as widely used and established so I will merge and redirect as best I can. Thanks for the note. Enjoy your weekend. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You recently converted the redirect Theraphosidae, that has for long been a redirect to the substantially developed article Tarantula, into a minute stub. I have reverted this edit, and ask that you reconsider making similar changes: over 100 articles link to Theraphosidae, and breaking the redirect means viewers are presented with a meager stub rather than a quality article. The alternate meanings of "Tarantula" are addressed in Tarantula. Please feel free to propose redirects beforehand on the relevant article talk page(s), and/or WikiProject Spiders. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 03:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Protected areas of Laos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MopSeeker (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Fortuna Forest Reserve, NotAnOmbudsman!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added a relevant category and stub to facilitate expansion.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Punta Patiño, NotAnOmbudsman!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Don't forget to add categories and stubs tags when appropriate.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello! Thanks for your contributions. You seem to have a variety of interests. I'd just like to again remind you to always include a {{taxobox}} in every article you create on a species, genus, family, etc. A couple of categories, and the most relevant {{stub}} tag (see e.g. Category:Plant stubs) would be helpful as well. Keeping articles sorted and organized by categories helps them be more easily read by viewers and improved by other editors. A small but important step: each time you create an article without these, it just adds more busy work for reviewers. Please let me know on my Talk page if you have any questions about taxoboxes, categories, stubs, or anything! Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 01:57, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips. What's the difference between a tribe and a genus? Should Posoquerieae link to Posoqueria? NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tribe is a rank above genus but below family or subfamily. A tribe may contain one or many genera, but a genus will not contain any tribes. A taxobox is the best way to link the article to higher ranks (tribe, family, order, class, etc.), but not all ranks need inclusion, usually only main ranks; i.e. a taxobox for an animal species generally has genus, family, order, class, phylum, & kingdom, but for the sake of brevity usually omits intermediate ranks such as subclass, infraorder, subtribe, etc. unless they are particularly well-known groups. A genus taxobox however might include lesser ranks to provide context (e.g. subtribe or tribe: compare the taxoboxes of Pentas and Pentas lanceolata). Posoquerieae is apparently a tribe two genera: Posoqueria and Molopanthera, and so should probably get its own article (similar to the related tribe Alberteae). However, if Posoquerieae was a monotypic tribe (only contained Posoqueria), then Posoquerieae would be a redirect to the genus rather than a separate article (see WP:MONOTYPICFLORA and WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA). Note, some editors like to use the {{automatic taxobox}} template rather than the default, but I prefer not to. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if something exists on Wikispecies can it be copied over (with attribution in edit summary)? I realize some of the formatting and such is different but it is a mirror project is it not? NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give more clarification? What would you be copying? Simple lists usually don't require attribution, as data is not subject to copyright. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the information! I saw that some species are already on Wikispecies. The information for the one I saw was pretty bare and mostly taxonomic, but it seems like it's better than nothing.. NotAnOmbudsman (talk) 05:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Air Panama destinations

added links pointing to El Porvenir and Pedasi

Chiriquí National Park

added links pointing to Cedar and Hawthorn

Salvadoran cuisine

added links pointing to Maya and Morro

Calobre

added a link pointing to Río San Juan

Constitutional Court of Armenia

added a link pointing to Armenian constitution

Nagorno-Karabakh War

added a link pointing to Nakhichevan

Narganá Wilderness Area

added a link pointing to San Blas

Protected areas of Panama

added a link pointing to Parque Central

Rashaya Citadel

added a link pointing to Canaanite

Small Plate Movement

added a link pointing to Albert Lea

Supreme Council of Armenia

added a link pointing to Armenian National Council

University of Central Asia

added a link pointing to Tekeli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tarhal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarhal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elias Z 06:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netcha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netcha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ej Jouâr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a populated place, legally-recognized or otherwise. GEOnet has it as "scrubland" or alternately "area". Should never have been created in the first place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article YugaTech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple issues: The notability of the site or its founder has not been demonstrated (Abe Olandres redirects here); tone may be a bit promotional; almost all sources are primary sources citing itself, if there are any sources to begin with.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

(You created the Abe Olandres redirect.) 84.250.14.116 (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]