User talk:Luckyluke/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Luckyluke. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

I see you have reverted my section on breaks in this article. A similar section exists on Chartwell Elementary School. I think I'll rv that. Canadianshoper 06:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Good call on the Chartwell article. Luke! 06:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I see that you nominated yourself on RFA. Would you mind if I give you a co-nomination? And, one trivial question to ask, though we have so much cooperation in articles and discussions, I still don't know whether you're a boy or a girl. Please reply ASAP and thank you very much. Wish you success first in RFA. --Deryck C. 16:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Deryck C, Thank you for your support with my RfA. I am most humbled by your offer to co-nominate my RfA and welcome it. I will try my best to be worthy of the confidence that you have placed in me. Of interest, I am male. Thanks again and I look forward to our future collaborations. Luke! 20:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Just a reminder: don't argue with Hipocrite. It is fruitless arguing with a more reputable person upon unwritten conventions. The voters will decide whether they listen to his viewpoint. --Deryck C. 07:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Stop messing round with the caerleon page!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Caerleonschool (talk • contribs) 19:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC). Luke, why don't delete this crap from your talk? The Evil Clown 21:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I've considered getting rid of it. But I'm alittle unsure as to if its better as a badge of honor or if its just a distraction. We'll see. Maybe soon though. Luke! 01:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm writing this to Alanbly, Luckyluke, and Aporkyltaros: this (12.207.115.187) is a shared computer. I have no idea who made those edits or any of the previous ones. But for crying out loud, is it really necessary to keep sending me messages about it? (And how exactly do I remove the "you have new messages thing" coming in to the IP?) -messersmith2

To remove the "you have new messages thing", you may simply select the (last changes) link when it comes up. When you check it, the message box will disappear. If you are editting from a shared computer (such as a library or a school computer), it would be best if you registered a username to differentiate between your edits and IP edits. Your subsequent edits will then be attributed to your username and not an IP. Luke! 20:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Luckyluke/Archive 2 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 17:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

hi I have created the Hong Kong cinema tmeplate as with all the other major countries. Please inform as many contributors to the Hong Kong cinema as possible to add the template at the foot of all HK cinema articles Thanks-I hope you like it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Luke! 23:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

So sorry, I apparently accidentally added you to the AIV page when trying to report the IP Vandal dorking up the Jenny McCarthy page. Fortunately the admin knew what I meant, and not what I said. Again, my apologies. -Quintote 00:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I just visited the AIV page for the same reason. Must of been just moments before the admin noticed. Luke! 00:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I am a merchandiser for a national company who specializes in concert promotion and music merchandise. I have information from sources that Alba and Porpora are currently "seeing each other socially" acording to Porpora. What s actually needed in order to confirm personal updates on this site? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rocco2323 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC).

To start off, take a look at the Wikipedia guidelines for attributing and citing source which in general covers all content on Wikipedia. Since the Jessica Alba article is currently a biography about a living person, her article will be the subject of increased guidelines. From what you have told me so far, it sounds like the content you are trying to add falls under original research and does not use an independant, verfiable, published source to support it. Unless you can find such published sources, it looks like the content you are trying to add does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for inclusion. I hope this helps and should you need any help in the future, please do let me know. Luke! 01:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm looking to find the coordinates for the tower and thought you might be able to help. As far as I can see based on the small maps in the Canada Flight Supplement, Google Earth's image and your picture it should be at 49 17 11N 123 06 44W. The reason for getting them in is that it's the only control tower in Canda that is specifically for a water aerodrome. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

On top of that do you have a reference for it being the highest in the world. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Bobanny has just added the coordinates. I'll be looking for a source for the aerodrome content. Luke! 22:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

THanks. I know it's the highest but I couldn't find a solid source. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I've added two sources - albeit fair weak sources except for the Nav Canada one. I thought it would be easier to find sources on such a claim. I will keep looking for more. Luke! 05:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I saw your name on the coaching requests list. If you still need a coach and would like me to fill that role, I'd be happy to. I have just a few conditions, and they are that you:

1. don't go for your RfA or accept an RfA nomination until I think you are ready.
2. take the advice provided by me and your fellow students to heart (this will be a group effort)
3. display the template {{VC assignments}} somewhere on one of your user pages where you can access it easily (at or near the top of your talk page is a pretty good place).

And that's it.

If you agree, I'll set up a section for you on the Virtual classroom, and we can get started.

I look forward to your reply. The Transhumanist   04:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Transhumanist, thanks for your reply and taking note of my request for an admin coach. I am still in search of a coach and my search may have just come to an end. I agree to your terms and look forward to starting at your earliest convenience. Luke! 05:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Your first assignment is posted at User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom#Luckyluke. Good luck! The Transhumanist   20:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Right you are. I googled it just because it rang familiar to me, but I didn't have time to look any deeper. I guess just because "Harbour" is in the name of the Harbour Control Tower that makes it confusing. This photo confirms where it is (taken from Harbour Centre) Bobanny 02:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Bold text

I have taken off the quotes and rephrase all the summer courses .Turns out I got around to doing it after all and I also have a log in thank you for making me aware of such things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angelpink 54 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

I've rewritten question #7 in your Editor Review. The Transhumanist   03:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

 GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Nehrams2020 19:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

A draft of the next VC lesson is available at User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom/Yuser, on external links and link spam.

Please take a look at it and copyedit as needed. It goes live in a couple days.

Thank you! The Transhumanist    09:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Luke, give me a second I'm trying to make this a proper article. I'm going to delete the original!

Use the {{hangon|}} tag along with a reasonably valid reason to give notice that you contest the speedy deletion. I'll put this page on my watchlist to monitor its progress. If it progresses, it won't get deleted by an admin per CSD criteria. Luke! 00:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for re-nominating the article for deletion. Someone was suggesting that we do a mergeto instead? What did you change in the syntax anyways? I didn't seen any new history changes. Benjwong 05:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

My changes can be seen directly after your initial page creation (they are two consecutive edits). Luke! 00:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. Both are now marked "Speedy close". Benjwong 01:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Just for your information, I have since closed your second nomination per speedy close to allow the first nomination to run its course. This has been purely a maintenance edit to prevent other editors from being confused. Should you believe, that the outcome of the first AfD requires a deletion review, you may request one. Luke! 22:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

is a Central and Eastern Europe club in Asia based in Hong Kong. It is one of the very rare few organizations of its kind in the world -

1. it attempts to bring Central and Eastern Europe, two politically opposite regions together

2. it brings Central and Eastern European culture abroad - to Asia.

Non-profit, it is not a private club but an open to all transnational organization.

The first deletion by Redvers, known vandal, was made together with deletions of all my other contributions. Not much logic in that.

Perhaps you could advise how the article could be improved? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LaBohemienne (talk • contribs) 13:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC).

Hi

I was cleaning up WP:PM when I found your entry for merging MSN Messenger and Windows Live Messenger. From the discussion on both talk pages, there did not seem to be consensus. Is that right, or was it clearly decided not to merge? I couldn't exactly figure out, but I'd like to help in any way if I could. If there was no consensus, then I would like to re-open the discussion. Any ideas about this?

Thanks xC | ☎ 09:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for taking note of the proposed merger. The notice found on WP:PM refers to the last proposed merge/move discussion from 2005. That discussion was closed with a no consensus. A similar request was made shortly after the previous closure in January 2007. The subsequent discussion was closed with an oppose move, keep at MSN Messenger, consensus. While there was no consensus reached in the merger relating to WP:PM, the subsequent keep at MSN Messenger consensus from January indicates a consensus. Since that decision was made in January 2007, I believe, it is still relatively early to initiate another discussion. However, the closing admin closed it only a week after the move was proposed - there may be grounds there to re-open it. However, you should contact the closing admin IanManka first to seek his rationale for closure, then decide on whether a re-open is necessary. Luke! 17:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll do that then, I found it a little strange that the windows live messenger article has a notice at the top saying for the old versions called msn msngr click here. well, let me go check with ianmanka then, thanks! xC | ☎ 17:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, it would be useful if, when your close AfDs where the article has already been speedily deleted, you could include the name of the deleting admin and their reason for doing so in your summary of the outcome of the discussion. Thanks, WjBscribe 22:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointer. Luke! 22:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank You！—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mawai (talk • contribs) 07:45, April 1, 2007

Greetings from Canada,
I have across the article Wah Yan College Cats to which you deleted per CSD criteria and, subsequently approximately four hours later, restored it. I'm seeking your rationale for second-guessing yourself as I am considering nominating it for an AfD. I have since reviewed the article in its entirety. I can find little established notability to justify the existence of this article. It appears to be dominated heavily by content which has not been attributed properly - most likely original research, as the article history shows that it has only been edited by one registered editor. Additionally per notability guidelines for organizations, there appears to be insufficient secondary reliable sources out there to support this article. At most, I can see this article having a section in the Wah Yan College article, but not its own. Would love to hear your thoughts. Luke! 04:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey Luke. I deleted the article under A7, but the article creator showed me some external sources which made me reconsider the speedy deletion (the conversation is in my archives somewhere, I'll dig it out). I did tell the creator, however, that the article could still be deleted under AfD, and may have considered doing so myself, except I wasn't sure it would be proper for me to do so. Anyway, I don't believe the subject is important enough to warrant inclusion, but still believed that speedy deletion was a little excessive, and wouldn't object to an AfD debate. – Riana ^ऋ 05:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Here's the conversation, from the creator to me [1] and from me to the creator [2]. Hope that helps you set up your case somewhat. Cheers! – Riana ^ऋ 05:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and taking the time to paste the discussion back onto my talk page as well. Much appreciated. :) Luke! 05:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi! EDC did appear on Infernal Affairs I. He played the young Andy Lau. You can check Infernal Affairs I here on Wikipedia or even go to their wesite. I'm also wondering why the part about his girls was deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.126.106.96 (talk) 12:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC).

Regarding the "ratings suspension" as noted at Template:WikiProject Hong Kong/to do (and therefore displayed on the WPHK template), I would like to know if the suspension is on importance only, or does it include both importance and quality. Thanks! --:Raphaelmak: [talk] [contribs] 08:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

At this time, it is just on class/importance. Feel free to rate quality of articles. Luke! 19:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that...I wasn't worried about the links. Whichever version of the page you reverted to had the text "IM AWESOME" randomly inserted at the end of a section. I reverted to get rid of that text, and aparently choose a version with the links intact. (That wasn't my intention.) Best-Fixer1234 03:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC) comment was added by Fixer1234 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC).

Oh ok. I saw that. Good catch. Cheers. Luke! 03:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow that was fast. I get a coffee, and they're already added to Granville Island and Chinatown (Vancouver)...Have a good one.--Keefer | Talk 22:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

We weren't talking about the general geology of Hong Kong. GB and I were actually discussing whether Lam Tin#geography granite is Jurassic or Cretaceous. For the article creation requests backlog, make sure that you don't start an article until you gather enough info to make it a start-class one. Otherwise it'd be a pity that we miss a DYK hope. --Deryck C. 05:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and the pointer. Luke! 05:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm back from wikibreak!

I noticed your question to Dweller about Featured articles. Dweller has just completed an entire lesson on that subject which is currently being proofread/copy-edited in preparation of its being posted soon on the VC. I'm pretty sure it answers your question, and it would sure help if you jumped in and helped polish the lesson. Also, if you think of any more questions about FA's while reading it, please let us know (on the lesson's talk page).

I've posted some new assignments for you at the VC. We all look forward to seeing you there.  The Transhumanist    23:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 19:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your questions at the VC. I've finally finished em. (User:The_Transhumanist/Virtual_classroom/Coaching#Questions_for_Dweller.2C_round_3) --Dweller 13:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Dear Luckyluke,

why did you consider the link to our book on tourism discourse as spam? It is an academic publication.

Thanks for any information you can provide,

Gloria

mail@gloriacappelli.it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.104.217.238 (talk) 09:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

Thanks for uploading Image:Akrit2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Will you please leave a message that explains clearly what you've changed on the CUHK page. It causes frustration when the history log says you've edited something, but the locations of the changes are unclear. Please be more active on the CUHK discussion page before you do a major edit, thank you. Justicelilo 07:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Since I have not editted that page in a while, I am assuming you are referring to my latest edit in May [3]. I did use an edit summary for this edit. I provided an "rvv" explanation which is widely known to be shorthand for reverting vandalism. As you will notice in this edit, I was restoring a large chunk of the content that was removed by user:Lubar, with no explanation yet classified as a minor edit. You will also notice from my contributions that I have always consistently used edit summaries. Since I do not see the same message on user:Lubar's talk page, I believe this message may have been mistakenly intended for that user and not myself. But please do feel free to correct me. In the meantime, I'll continue to try to use effective edit summaries. Thanks for your feedback. Luke! 03:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Understood. Thanks. Justicelilo 17:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for joining WikiProject Tourism. We just started off less than 24 hours ago, so we can use any help we can get. I hope you like the project, and I hope you decide to stay. Thanks again! Cool Blue^{talk to me} 16:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello: Was very involved in the Telus cellphone pornography debate. I live in BC. I'm actually quoted in a number of the Globe and Mail stories and in the BC Catholic and have followed the story closely. I was trying to add a few more references that I thought might give the citation some extra credibility and shelf life: i.e. New York Times, Bloomberg. Noticed that you have nixed these. I also wondered whether Ms. Yale really warranted a place in the reference. I thought we'd give her just a spokesperson or ?

Ignore my last stuff. I forgot to save. Arrgh.

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Capbridgelogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fairfieldmarriott.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Twinseffect.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jwmarriottjr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jwmarriott.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HK Olympic Committee.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Grousemountain.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Telus.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marriottvacationclub.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marriotthotelsresorts.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marriott.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rmvlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parkerplacelogo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ParkRoyalShoppingCentre.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Residenceinn.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Renaissance.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins6thyearlabum.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins_ho_hoo_tan.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 19:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins_80_dollars_album_cover.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 19:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twinsmagicalbumcover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twinsevolutionalbumcover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Touchoflovealbumcover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins_happy_together_album_cover.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Amazing_show_dvd_cover.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Amazing_album_cover.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins_our_souvenir_album_cover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins-avep.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins_love_cover.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. BigrTex 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Twins-avep.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jwmarriottjr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Plaxo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TheVillage@Park Royal.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining a C-pop task force to improve Chinese pop articles on wikipedia. Granted, we'll probably be working on the articles one at time (working on multiple articles with one user per article is pretty much asking for death. Many hands make light work). As much as I'm not a huge fan of Cantopop, there will be an equal emphasis on both, i.e. we'll be working to improve both Canto and Mando to GA (or higher) levels. This is where, ideally, you'd come in. You probably have a better idea than I do about what Cantopop artists have done, or even which Cantopop artists are out there (a lot of them I hadn't even heard of before, like Justin Lo. I know, it's sad.) So yeah, if you'd like to help out, that's great. I'm just gauging interest for now; there's no "task force" set up yet. But if there are enough people (5-6?) willing, then we can get the party started. Pandacomics 07:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Held on 14th, July,2007 （星期六）3:00 p.m. At CityTopRest, 9/F Recreational building, Hong Kong City University WIKIMEDIA HONG KONG Establishment Ceremony Refreshment is prepared. You are welcomed. Sith lord darth vader敬約 If you are not free, please click here to reply.

I have tagged Image:Centamap.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 20:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged Image:Round_square.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 20:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Burnett.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 21:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:GillianHead.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 11:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

Since there are problems with the prose with Jackie Chan, I would like to invite you to make a copy edit of the article's contents. It's currently a FAC, and an oppose has called for a copy edit by another experienced editor. So if you please?--Kylohk 02:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me about them. I just get way too caught up with all the banner putting up that my fingers get a bit too tired to write them, even though I should. Pandacomics 02:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

As an aside, I think the original editor intended for Hacken's "symphonic c-pop" to refer to his work with the Hong Kong Philharmonic, à la Justin Lo. (shrugs) Pandacomics 05:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello, you said that you can't find the route map of CX. Here is it)

To get the ball moving, I've started Wikipedia:WikiProject Tourism/CotW, the Collaboration of the Week. Check there for this week's goal. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 19:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sort of joking here, but I do want to be sure I didn't change British/Canadian spelling. In the USA we spell it story. Same in Canada, right? Ward3001 19:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

In Canada, floors of a building are spelt storey. Luke! 19:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

No kidding! I just learned something new. Sorry about that! Anyway, the article is about an American hotel, so how about we leave it as story? Ward3001 19:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I learned something new too! I didn't know that storey had multiple spellings. But yes, I have no concerns with keeping it American as per WP:SPELLING. See you around! Luke! 19:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)