User talk:Hmallett

If you post a message here, you may wish to add this page to your watchlist, as as replies will be placed here.

Welcome to the UK Waterways WikiProject!

There's plenty to be done, and precious few of us doing it, so good luck.

Mayalld 15:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your maps. You don't say what icons you still need. You never know, someone may create them. :) Oosoom ^Talk to me 19:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The icons I could do with are: ugLIFT; ugKRZuy; ugddSTRl; ugSRTbr; ugENDEe. That's for starters. Hmallett 22:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that ugLIFT and ugSWING have now been added, so I've updated my templates to reflect these changes so far. Hmallett 08:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the wharfs. I see you are having a go at images on Commons yourself. Remember to put a copyright tag in or the image will be deleted! I use public domain for canal icons as it makes them freely available for modification without having to worry about preserving the correct attribution or licence tags. And I should point out that the category for canal icons on Commons spells canal with a lower case c (the category is named incorrectly on Wikipedia). Good luck. Oosoom ^Talk to me 09:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointers. Changes made as needed (I think). Hmallett 09:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the building/pumphouse icons. Yiour requested ugENDEe already exists. Is that what you wanted? Oosoom ^Talk to me 09:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ugENDEe does exist, as you say, but that's a transition from in use canal to not-in use canal. What I thought I needed (for the end of the Montgomery canal) was the same icon as uENDEe, but in green. In fact, there was a wharf at the end, so I can create a wghfKBFg and use that instead. Hmallett 10:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The how to that's on yout user page is a good move. Might vbe worth expanding it to include the BS2 - BS5 templates that are needed for more complex cases. Mayalld 06:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll expand it once I've figured it out for myself! I've not used those templates yet.

BS2 allows 2 icons side by side, BS3 allows 3 icons side by side (I think you get the picture!) Useful for displaying short branches and the lik. Mayalld 11:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think you may need to pay some attention to the correct use of licencing, eg gwhfKBFg.

When creating a new icon from an existing one it is important to preserve any copyright conditions of the original. If the original has a GFDL licence then you need to preserve that GFDL on every derivative icon, mentioning the original author (or all previous authors) - giving attribution. This is a fundamental principle behind GFDL and no work based on a GFDL original can become public domain (unless you are the absolute creator in which case you could republish as PD).

When I create an original I use PD to make this process easier for others, but if I modify a previous work then I have to copy the original licence if it was not PD and credit the author. This is some extra effort but needs to be done. :) Good luck. Oosoom ^Talk to me 08:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. Could you please have a look at and tell me if the modified copyright is in the right format? Thanks. Hmallett 09:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with putting yourself in as a joint author. I am not sure whether there is a prescribed form, but this is how I did a similar thing: . Oosoom ^Talk to me 11:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind. I changed part of the instructions on your user page to show the correct way to put the maps in the category without putting the articles in as well. :) Oosoom ^Talk to me 10:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I saw your edit to my templates, worked out why, and was going to change my instructions, but you beat me to it!

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Montgomery Waterway Restoration Trust, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmenvfru/345/345we37.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 15:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.h-g-canal.org.uk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on John Williams (engineer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. carelesshx _talk 13:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new co-ordinates point to the corner of Cross Street and Leg Street in the town centre... well, according to Google Maps they do. David (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked - the other map services point to the same location. David (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am currently trying to reduce the number of UK Waterways stub-class articles, by adding content. I have just found the John Williams article, which has had one sentence since 2007, when speedy deletion was suggested, which you contested. I cannot find any more information about him, as he is not even listed in the ICE Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers. Do you still think it is worth keeping this article? Bob1960evens (talk) 13:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw that you listed your interests as including the Ellesmere Canal on the UKW project page, and wondered if you can throw any light on why the maximum boat widths for the Ellesmere / Chester section to Nantwich have steadily reduced. I think the locks are still their original width (at over 14 ft), but the current maximum width is quoted as 9 ft (Cumberlidge 2009, Nicholson 2006, etc). Regards. Bob1960evens (talk) 13:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hmallett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (F–K), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grasmere, Fulford and Greenhithe. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]