User talk:Enoska13

Thank you for this message. The content was originally authored by me years ago in inventor Alan Amron Wikipedia page. I did copy it and paste as relative published information inserted in to the Beatles Wilipedia page.

Enoska13 (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arthur Fry has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arthur Fry was changed by Ivetsaksone (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86935 on 2018-03-14T08:48:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Beatles into several other pages. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am the original contributor author of this original content and all of its source references cited. I will however add that "Attribution: content in this section was copied from The Beatles on April 22, 2018. Please see the history of that page for full attribution. Enoska13 (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Beatles into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. – Isochrone (T) 12:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Soaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lonnie Johnson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, it would help if you also wikilinked within your edit summary to the original page by using [[Passport]], for example. Please have a look at how I've done a similar edit summary at Workshops Rail Museum in this edit diff at Special:Diff/1169755814. If copying is extensive or otherwise you want to, you should also add this Template:Copied, then fill in the necessary parameters and then adding it to the respective source and destination talk pages of any copying. An example you can have a look at is User talk:Blammy1/sandbox.

Also by the way, you don't need to add four tildes to your edit summaries, that's only for talk post signatures like this one: Fork99 (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also ping me by adding {{ping|Fork99}} to your reply if you reply to me here as it will then notify me that you've replied. You don't need to do this if common sense tells you that you're not replying to anyone in particular, or if you're replying for example, to me on my own user talk page, I also don't need to on your talk page for you as Wikipedia automatically already notifies you of new talk page posts/comments on your own user talk page. Please let me know if you have any further questions, or ask at the WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk. Fork99 (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. After reading all your texts, I’m confused. Could you please correct what it is you’re asking me to do on my edit so in the future I can follow it. Enoska13 (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{ping|Fork99}} Enoska13 (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know what you’re saying. In my edit summary I should type this: Copied content from page I copied content from see that page’s history for attribution. Enoska13 (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fork99: I replied to your texts. Enoska13 (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you got it! That's just following the advice given by the wiki guideline at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Ah I should have made it clearer that you don't need to copy the code and nowiki bits when pinging, it's interesting how most new editors respond to wiki markup, don't worry I was in the same boat only a few years ago! Maybe it might be easier if I explain how to reply for newcomers by typing the @ symbol if you're using the reply tool, then it should drop down a list of usernames, which you did. Fork99 (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Enoska13. You recently added a block of text to Social Security (United States) which did not directly relate to the article content and appeared to be an attempt to promote an invention rather than inform users in an encyclopedic way. Another editor @Avatar317 removed that text.

On further investigation I found you added the same block of text to two other articles. I've removed both of those edits for the same reason.

This pattern of editing, along with the substantial edits you have made to Alan Amron and other pages, suggests you may have a connection to Mr. Amron and/or his inventions. Wikipedia expects editors who have a conflict of interest to disclose that conflict and to refrain from directly editing in a way that reflects that conflict of interest. May I ask:

• if you have a relationship to Mr. Amron or his inventions; and
• if you have previously edited Wikipedia under another account name?

Of course, it's entirely possible I've misunderstood the situation, and I apologize if this suspicion is unwarranted. If so, please feel free to explain below. Oblivy (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your edits and thank you for them. I was adding new uses for drivers license and Social Security cards as reported in the many citations I found on the subject. I thought we as Wikipedia contributors should give as much pertinent and relative information as possible on any given subject that would be of interest to that page as possible. I am interested in inventions and inventors that contribute great new technologies. I follow Alan Amron and many other known inventors, but not connected to them at all. I will try harder to follow Wikipedia rules on being more involved with the page subject going forward. Thank you for these edits. Enoska13 (talk) 02:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response.

My concern, aside from the conflict of interest (which you indicate is a non-issue) was that the information was not pertinent to the articles to which it was added. I still think that's true. The fact that a technology is potentially relevant to people interested in a topic does not make it part of that topic.

As far as I can tell none of the citations you added referred to the application of the invention to the article topic, for example, a state or country that actually used the invention at issue for drivers licenses or passports. If you disagree, I suggest you raise the issue on the talk page of the relevant article so that editors interested in the topic can consider whether it's worth including. Oblivy (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Vandalism. The thread is User writing about himself in random pages for atleast five years. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:UPE. Thank you. JonasTisell (talk) 17:52, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been learning what the Wikipedia rules and guidelines are and made some mistakes, but I in no way am vandalizing at all. If my edits are taken down I understand the reasoning and learn from it. I don’t do that much editing, but on inventions and inventors that I follow I try to be correct. Enoska13 (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Why do you write about Amron and Amron only, for five whole years if not more? This is certainly a conflict of interest. Also, how do you have access to all of Amron's photographs spanning back to the nineties? JonasTisell (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you’ll notice I have not edited on Wikipedia for five years just started again a month ago. I write about several inventors and inventions. I happen to have been in contact five years ago with Alan Amron to get his right to publish his photos on wiki commons. Since then I have followed his inventions. Enoska13 (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia administrator and Editors,

I am writing to apologize for my inappropriate edits. I was inexperienced in Wikipedia editing rules and guidelines and I acted too aggressively and impulsively. I did not represent those I respect properly and I caused unnecessary conflicts and confusion.

I am deeply sorry for my actions. I take full responsibility for my mistakes and I sincerely regret any harm or inconvenience I caused. I have learned from this experience and I will make sure to be more careful and respectful in the future. I have also read the Wikipedia policies and guidelines to improve my understanding and skills as an editor.

Thank you for your understanding. I appreciate all your work and dedication to Wikipedia and I hope we can move past this incident and work together constructively.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I welcome any suggestions or advice on how to improve my editing skills. Enoska13 (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I never edited in any other name or account.Enoska13 (talk) 06:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrator and Concerned Editors,

I am writing to apologize once again for my improper aggressive postings. I understand that my actions were not in accordance with the guidelines and rules that you have established. I continue to take full responsibility for my mistakes.

I have a question for the editors who removed not only my contributions but also content added by other Wikipedia editors over the years. I am curious about the fairness and accuracy of this approach. Recently, I came across Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, which emphasize that editors should prioritize fairness and accuracy over retaliatory editing. In this case, I feel that the editors did not respond in this manner, despite it being my fault.

I began editing Wikipedia on a whim in February 2018 and subsequently stopped approximately a year later. However, I resumed editing five years later in July 2023. Unfortunately, I exercised poor judgment over the past two months, leading me to make the decision to withdraw from any further Wikipedia editing. As I depart, I kindly request that the editors involved here approach the edits they swiftly removed with fairness, restoring those that are genuinely valuable and those posted by other Wikipedia editors.

Thank you for your understanding.

Enoska13 (talk) 04:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Your sole purpose in editing here has been to promote Alan Amron. You could be blocked alone for this, and further private evidence shows you have a conflict of interest. If you want to be unblocked, you should accept a topic ban with regards to Amron. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]