User talk:Coolrascal

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Coolrascal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Una Smith (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rood & Riddle

A tag has been placed on Rood & Riddle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 04:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This post is in respose to your posting on my talk page. You ask why this article was deleted, an action which I note I undertook some eighteen months ago. (I would concede that there is no time limit on deletion queries.) In my opinion the article reads as unequivocally promotional, and hence not appropriate for the encyclopedia. It is also true that the notability you mention in your message to me is not mentioned in the article. I do not feel that it would be appropriate for me to restore the article, but you have the option to take your request to WP:DRV if you so wish. In passing, I feel that your comparison of Rood and Riddle with Coca-Cola does not stand up to detailed examination. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your further comment. My authority is granted by the wikipdia community, but as I have already said it is not the final authority; you can lodge an appeal against deletion at WP:DRV. Speculation about my potential, hypothetical activity in response to another article with which I had no involvement is irrelevant. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gentry Brothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gentry Brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentry Brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]