User talk:AldenEPark

Welcome!

Hello, AldenEPark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! William M. Connolley (talk) 09:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your recent addition, which appears to be a copy of your www1.iwvisp.com/LA4Park/CosmicRays.txt. If you would like to discuss this, please answer here William M. Connolley (talk) 09:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand from your talk page that this is where I should respond, as you are watching here. Is this correct? I only quoted essentially the first paragraph of my own writing (CosmicRays.txt). If it were someone else's writing, I can understand why you would see that there is a problem with that. I put a comment in the discussion; unfortunately I selected the wrong section named Query (which had a query by someone else sitting at the top of that section) when I thought I was selecting the subject heading above it. I was confused when I wrote the discussion comment, as I couldn't figure out why my words simply vanished. Now I understand that you had them removed. Are you able to restore them? Maybe I should have not used quote marks, as I was writing my own words so that it would be clear that others would be welcome to change them, if they did not like them. Maybe the solution would be for me to try again, with more varied words (somewhat like my comments in the discussion but not so varied that someone thinks it is original research) to explain where the most energetic cosmic rays come from and reference CosmicRays.txt so that it would be fairly clear that the article contains no original research. I still need to figure out how to use the more usual referencing notation. Thank you for your feedback rather than just letting me wonder what happened. Alden E. Park (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged that paragraph that you added. The cold fusion article only lists the most notable explanations, and only from reliable sources. Please source it from reliable sources, showing that it is a notable explanation, or it will be deleted in a few days. Thank you. --Enric Naval (talk) 08:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alden, I have deleted you contribution. I have looked at you pages at [1] and although I see that you have created a lot of content I am very confident that wikipedia editors will not agree with you when you add that content to wikipedia articles. It is regarded as original research (see WP:NOR for explanation) and that is not allowed in wikipedia. Please do not try to publish your research on wikipedia, your work is best published on your website as it is already right now. Regards --POVbrigand (talk) 12:18, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alden,

as I mentioned before please do not publish your original research on Wikipedia. Maybe you should consider self-publishing your research in book form.

Please do not do it on wikipedia.

Thanks --POVbrigand (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]