User talk:194.146.156.12

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kyrgyzstan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

look on kazakhstan article it does not have it in the lead.194.146.156.12 (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kyrgyzstan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Kiradjieff brothers. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 194.146.156.12, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 14:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i told the anonymous IP to go to the talk page and he did not and he should be blocked because he did not listen to my advise and i left a message there.194.146.156.12 (talk) 13:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gyros (food), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You may be right about gyros deriving from doner - but that isn't what the source says, nor is it very important. Everything derives from something else, but WHAT the thing is is more important than where it came from. WP:BRD means that you MUST gett agreement for your edits if they are challenged Pincrete (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Curry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Pakora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brotherly Leader and Guide of the Revolution, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Head of government. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 00:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 149.108.106.47. I noticed that in this edit to Dimitar Kovačevski, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----149.108.106.47 (see my talk page and contributions) 15:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]