Template talk:S-inc

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Biography This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

{{editprotected}}

This template is protected, and should be tagged with {{protected template}}, or another suitable protection template. Thanks – Qxz 19:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done; thanks. Flcelloguy (A note?) 20:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could someone replace the current version by that one please?

|width="30%" align="center" rowspan="{{{rows|1}}}"|'''Incumbent'''{{#if:{{{heir|}}}|<br/><div style="font-size:90%">{{#if:{{{heir-type|}}}|{{{heir-type}}}|Designated heir}}:<br/>{{{heir}}}</div>}}
|-<noinclude>
[[Category:Succession templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Templates using ParserFunctions|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{Protected template}}
[[ro:Format:S-inc]]
</noinclude>

I just enlarged the font size a bit (I think it needn't be thus small) and I removed the italic style. Louis88 13:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? - Louis88 10:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotect}} Please update the code of this template with the following. All current functions of the template will be retained but a new /doc pages has been added and two parameters have been added for better compatibility with certain templates. Feel free to add the protected status back onto the template; the code below omits it. Also, copy from the source code, not the view display.

<includeonly>|width="30%" align="center" rowspan="{{{rows|1}}}"|{{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{#switch:{{{1}}} |current='''Current holder''' |recent='''Most recent''' |#default={{#if:{{{1}}}|'''Incumbent'''}} }}|'''Incumbent'''}}{{#if:{{{heir|}}}|<br/><small>''{{#if:{{{heir-type|}}}|{{{heir-type}}}|Designated heir}}:<br/>{{{heir}}}''</small>}} |-</includeonly><noinclude> {{/doc}} <!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here. --> </noinclude>
–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 16:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Please change {{/doc}} to {{Documentation}} for appearance sake. I am doing it across the system since it seems to be the preferred format.
–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 00:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{documentation}} or {{template doc}}? I fear that there are two conflicting rival common ways of doing this, and it may be better to wait for something to happen with respect to the merge request between them. --ais523 12:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} I'm not happy with the phrase "Designated heir:". In the case of the British throne and peerages (where I noticed it), the succession is automatic, not depending on anyone to designate the heir. It would also be good if heir apparent and heir presumptive could be distinguished. —Tamfang (talk) 22:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we only use the parameter for automatic successions, so this makes for a pretty bad choice of words. However, a better one must be found if we are to change it, so I am listening to suggestions.

By the way, there is a parameter, "heir-type", where one can write "Heir apparent" or "Heir presumptive" and that will be displayed instead of the standard heir message ("designated heir"). It is mentioned in Template:S-start#S-inc, but I suppose I ought to add it here as well. See Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom for an example of its use. Waltham, The Duke of 16:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Heir would be better, as the default. Please change. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me. "Heir" is the simplest and likeliest to fit all cases.  Done, — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm ... Some would insist that an heir-apparent or heir-presumptive is only a potential heir, because no one is a just-plain-heir until he has inherited. —Tamfang (talk) 08:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} May request to add TBA for the upcoming TV/Movie will be air by the future. Thanks. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 02:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand. You'll have to be much more specific than that. Also, I suggest leaving a proposal here for a few days to allow people to comment before using {{editprotected}}. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For organizations, please add:
|extant='''Extant'''
Thanks Greenshed (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]