Talk:Wake Up (Hilary Duff song)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article was full of errors about the song getting to #4 in the U.S.—as one can see here [1], that's way off the mark. It did get to #4 on the Hot Digital Songs chart, so that may be where the confusion is from. Everyking 16:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed these from the article; hopefully somebody can cite them:

#6 Israel, #9 Spain, #29 Canada (from the infobox)

Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 19:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This could of at least been mentioned here, but instead I get personal attacks about small mistakes like 'capital letters' which even wikipedia says in the policies that it doesn't matter if you make spelling mistakes, they can easily be fixed by another user.

Thanks, Jessica_simpson121

EM just removed some chart info [2] saying that it was being excluded to reduce the amount of detail in the article. This is very counter-productive. Chart info is notable and should be covered to the extent that it can be referenced. In the past, he has removed chart info on the grounds that it can't be verified, which is acceptable, but removing content from an article based simply on one's own idiosyncratic ideas about how much a reader wants to know (or needs to know?) is not acceptable. Everyking 01:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A consensus has been established that not all verifiable chart information is notable and should be included; see Wikipedia:Record charts and its discussion page. I've added a bit more detail on the single's chart performance in the UK and Australia, because they seem to be major music markets. Extraordinary Machine 17:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll agree that all chart info need not be considered notable. The week-to-week movements of a song below a certain level on the chart (top 20, top 40, etc.) don't necessarily need to be included. This is, however, not something that backs up your argument; the particular information you removed was sufficiently notable for inclusion, regardless of whether or not things less notable than that should be included. Everyking 11:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the comparison:

"In Sweden, the song debuted at 45 and remained on the chart for one week. In Austria, the song debuted at 60 and climbed up to 45 the next week. It remained at 45 for 2 weeks, before falling off the countdown. The song debuted at 31 on the Swiss Singles chart but did not rise and continued to drop for 13 weeks before falling off. It peaked at 5 in Norway, 3 weeks after its debut at 9. The song spent 2 weeks on its peak in the Netherlands, at 38. In other parts of Europe such as Germany the song did not do very well and peaked at 81. However, the song lasted for a long time on many charts such as the French charts, where it charted for 19 weeks." (old version)

"In Norway it reached the top five, but it peaked outside the top twenty in the France (where it remained on the chart for nineteen weeks), Switzerland and the Netherlands, and it did not reach the top forty in Sweden, Austria or Germany." (EM version)

What existed previously was one single paragraph explaining the song's performance in continental Europe. Most of the countries only get one sentence; one of them gets two sentences. You feel this is too much? This is all we have for the song's performance in all of continental Europe! We already have the peak positions in a chart; the text is useful for conveying information about where the song debuted, how long it lasted on the chart, and what sort of pattern it showed across the weeks. Everyking 11:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wake Up (Hilary Duff song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.hilaryduff.com.au/news/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wake Up (Hilary Duff song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090127032613/http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=624 to http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=624
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902190839/http://www.riaa.com/gp/database/default.asp to https://www.riaa.com/gp/database/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly she sings better than hilary. 88.226.246.83 (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]