Talk:Single-room occupancy

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Home Living Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Hotels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure that this reflects correct useage of the term SRO. In Chicago and other parts of the country, SRO is a newish term used only for SRO hotels--as the writer below notes a "flophouse." 2 core concepts are "hotel" it is possible to rent nightly and cheap enough that poor people can rent on a monthly basis.

A rooming house is probably a better term for the typical single family conversion--where tenants share a bathroom, but rent on a monthly basis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.0.101 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In NYC, the "cage hotel" would be called a "flophouse."

At the classier end of the SRO is the "residential hotel" with larger rooms, some with private bath.

Residential hotels were generally built as tourist or residential hotels, whereas most SROs were carved out of something else such as a private dwelling, apartment house . . . or hotel.

The show Hot L Baltimore takes place in a residential hotel.

Many newer SRO buildings in New York City in particular are actually quite comfortable more like small studio apartments/bachelor apartments than the traditional slum/flophouse/cage hotel the newer buildings typically inlude a bathroom and kitchenette for each resident in the room

Surely I'm not the only person who thinks the statement, "Typically, the residents in SROs are men who are impoverished, debilitated, mentally ill, addicted to drugs, and/or dying," is a little less than NPOV? ChrisStansfield ^Contribs 15:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well most of the article is unreferenced, so feel free to change it. I'm sure there are plenty of urban studies sources out there about SROs and low income housing. Wl219 07:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This statement is like saying that the typical residents of Beverly Hills are blonde bimbos with small dogs, big hair, and cocaine and plastic surgery habits.

I work as a land use planner in a small community with an affordable housing problem that we are hoping SROs can help alleviate--many workers in construction and seasonal positions come to our town alone, and need a place to stay that is suited to their needs as a single worker without family or friends in town. These individuals often end up either sharing a larger rental unit with a co-worker in order to meet their housing needs, but would prefer their own space, such as in an SRO. In my experience, impoverished men (and women) stay at emergency/homeless shelters or live on the street; the debilitated and mentally ill have special programs and housing to meet their needs (or are unable to make enough money to pay rent at all, and end up impoverished and homeless); drug addicts rarely have the presence of mind to secure housing that is appropriate for their addictions--usually they lose housing they can't stay in, as opposed to choosing housing that is appropriate (and as the moniker "crack house" suggests, drug addicts often flock together instead of finding their own private place to indulge their habits). And one could argue that residents of senior housing and hospitals are dying too, but in the context of this statement, it sounds like dying people are bad neighbors and to be avoided.

All of that said, probably the only safe way to describe residents of SROs is to say that they are "people who desire or need to live alone."Telejuneau (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ive lived in this kind of place for a while and have heard both terms used. i think single resident occupancy at least deserves a mention, perhaps redirecting here. im not sure though and will leave it to more experienced eds to figure this one out if any of them want to. Badmachine (talk) 20:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyone that needs a place where we can help us as much we can help them at the same time. We have plenty of room for anyone that needs any thing we can help with it. If you like to contact us deliciamontag@yahoo.com or call 813 857 6179. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.148.124.210 (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some are saying san francisco have the worst sro's in the country looking for a ranking of this somehow — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.168.9.182 (talk) 07:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Single room occupancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgov.org/site/sffd_page.asp?id=67297

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Single room occupancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021231164524/http://www.citypages.com/databank/23/1144/article10855.asp to http://www.citypages.com/databank/23/1144/article10855.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Apartment hotel into Single room occupancy. I see no reason for a separate article about one specific kind of SRO hotel. Guy Macon (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose on the grounds that there is no indications that Apartment hotels are a subtype of Single room occupancy. Apartment hotels may or may not provide single room occupancy, which is why there is already a separate section to discuss this subset within the apartment page. Klbrain (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose: The appartment hotel article clearly indicates they offer furnished apartments with amenities similar to a home. There is no indication that have substantially shared amenities like a single occupancy rental. They are also marketed to substantially different populations, indicating they are a notable topic in their own right. –Zfish118^⋉talk 17:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, given objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow Wikipedians, With my background of travel line of over 25 years, I am hearing this definition of Single Room Occupancy for the first time..,. What is mentioned and detailed here is Single Residency Occupancy (SRO)... Single Room Occupancy (SGL) on the other hand is a term to denote a person occupying a room (mainly in hotel/motel/Guest House) meant for 2 persons... So would request my fellow Wikipedians to make the correction before merging the two... Cheers ANUPAM DUTTA 12:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamdutta73 (talk)

Nope.

• City of San Diego’s (City) Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) Hotel Ordinance
• Sonoma County Single Room Occupancy (SRO) facilities
• HUD Single Room Occupancy Program (SRO)
• The Mt. Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 18.97: SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
• US Senate report on single-room occupancy (SRO) hotels
• More than a dozen coronavirus cases hit San Fransisco’s single-room-occupancy hotels

--Guy Macon (talk) 05:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A request has been submitted to WikiProject United States for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in the United States. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit skeptical of this last paragraph of the Possible Development section that reads with a negatively biased point of view rather than a statement of general fact or history. Moreover, all citations for this section are from the same 2015 book that conveys a rather fanciful negative tone about hotels (and SROs in particular). Notably:

> for example, the lobby becomes a place for tenants to "wait for the ambulance, or to meet your addiction counselor, or to laugh and sing." In some old hotels that are now SROs, the nearby storefronts have transitioned from high-end restaurants and clothing shops (in the past) to "HIV-AIDS outreach groups, nongovernmental organizations, and social services offices".

This also has nothing to do with possible development of SROs in the future like the paragraph above it does. I think this probably leans far enough away from NPOV to be removed, but I don't frequently edit articles, so I don't want to delete something that someone may be able to revise and improve with specific examples (I do not have a copy of the cited book, which may have examples). 173.68.98.181 (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]