Talk:Following

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: British This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the British cinema task force. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Is Johannes Duncker okay as a reliable source? christophernolan.net is obviously a fan site, but it looks classy. I checked other Nolan film articles and none use Duncker as a source, so I question whether we should here. Thoughts?
  Jim Dunning | talk 15:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Eh, you're probably right. I think I was being a bit hasty with my sources there. But it's information that shouldn't be too hard to source from somewhere else. On a related note, what's the consensus regarding the use of DVD commentaries as a source? Because Nolan's commentary on Following is a goldmine.JMalky (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• They are fair game. Use {{Cite video}} for the ref formatting.
  Jim Dunning | talk 16:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Good because it looks like we'll have to draw on it heavily! There seems to be very little on the web about Following, and even less that definitely satisfies WP:RS. JMalky (talk) 19:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This is a British film, so why is the budget in US dollars? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timtak (talk • contribs) 04:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably because it is a unit of currency used for international trade, or something. 67.149.192.84 (talk) 15:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speculative item about the origin of the name "Danny Lloyd" as coming from an actor in "The Shining". This does not seem to be true. According to the commentary on the DVD, the name was from David Lloyd a crewmember. David's credit card was used as a prop, but he did not want David to be used but he said that Danny was OK to go with the "D Lloyd" on the card.AbramTerger (talk) 16:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many times Cobb refers to the young man as Bill, so why doesn't this article name him as such? Are you not putting this in the article because he is credited as the Young Man? Unless somebody clarifies this I will make the appropriate revisions in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.205.9 (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The young man tells Cobb that his name is Bill and tells the blonde that his name is Daniel Lloyd. Cobb's reaction to the name "Bill" seems to suggest that Cobb knows he is being lied to and that that it is not Bill. We learn at the end that D Lloyd is the name the young man took from the credit card and that he was also lying to the blonde. The credits confirm that we don't have a name for the young man and the article went with what he was credited as.AbramTerger (talk) 15:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree and +1 for what @AbramTerger: brilliantly expressed above; when The Young Man tests Cobb's powers of deduction by burglarizing his (TYM's) own dismal studio or flat, Cobb notices the UB40 slip (Unemployment Benefit Form 40), but probably would've noticed had the form said Bill on it. Btw Rotten Tomatoes stupidly credits him as Bill; shouldn't they use the precise end-credits' text?? -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 07:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

By the way, when Cobb exits above mid-burglary and says, No offense, isn't it droll and could be construed as Cobb indicating that he's aware it's The Young Man's place? Awesome. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 07:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Following. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513200348/http://www.christophernolan.net/following_making.php to http://www.christophernolan.net/following_making.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205114801/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/266 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/266

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This WP article is merely titled, "Following," not "Following (film)?" I guess with Wikipedia there is some convention that the first article in does not require disambiguation text to the right... My Google search result showed a preview snippet of text that just says, "Following - Wikipedia," and below that, numbered links showing that there are other pages or articles called Following, with which the reader should not be confused. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 04:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]