Talk:Edward Pearce (journalist)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Whilst I have every sympathy for the victims of the Hillsborough disaster - and absolutely none for Pearce's views as expressed in his Sunday Times article following it - the 'Hillsborough controversy' section seems disproportionately large, especially since it doesn't include any response from him to the total debunking of the ill-informed insults he had written. JezGrove (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The absence of any discoverable attempt at responding to the debunking matches the absence of any discoverable evidence of any attempt on his part to retract and apologise for his comments. Does absence of positive evidence equate to negative evidence? In this case I believe so. Limhey (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]