Talk:Dwarka, Delhi

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Delhi / Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Under population and area, the pop is referred to as being 10 Lakhs. What does this mean? Shouldn't population be measured in 100's, 1000's or millions? Alexthekiwi (talk) 04:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have re written the article; but it is heavily borrowed from DDA website. --Aileronajay 05:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 04:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Dwarkasc4.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone? Sub city redirects to Sub City Records, and I'm fairly sure Dwarka isn't a record label. — JonC^ॐ 22:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dwarka, Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070321180359/http://www.dda.org.in/planning/dwarka.htm to http://dda.org.in/planning/dwarka.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]