Talk:Disney's Typhoon Lagoon

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Disney's Typhoon Lagoon. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Disney's Typhoon Lagoon at the Reference desk.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disney High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as High-importance).

In one place we have the Crush 'n' Gusher as using two or three person rafts, while in another we say one person rafts. Which is it? 204.69.40.7 13:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the "one person raft" to the correct "two to three person raft". Although single riders can ride in a two person raft.

That's a new one on me. I haven't been there in about 10 years, but when I was there, it was nurse sharks and sting rays. NOT Manta Rays... Have they changed? Heck, the Shark Reef was too small for manta rays, they'd suck the oxygen out of the pool and suffocate to death. As for the life jackets, they aren't "if needed", at least when I went there, they were MANDANTORY. The vests are mandantory because they don't want you diving to pet the de-barbed stingrays which stay below where the vest allows you to go. However, I managed to dive down some 20 feet to reach the stingrays and pet a couple for a few seconds. It wasn't easy, the vest made it incredibly difficult.

You are correct they are stingrays not manta rays, I will fix that. The lifejackets are not mandatory now. If you go to the Official Disney website they have a promo video on the shark reef and it doesn't show any of the guests wearing vests. They have 4 lifeguards, including one in the reef, to prevent guests from diving down into the water.Dwtootles 14:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates are wrong. In Google earth the link to the article is placed on the parkinglot of Blizzard Beach.

Coordinates should be roughly: 28°21'57.00" N 81°31'47.00" W —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.166.37.118 (talk) 20:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

It is established and cited that the park operates roughly nine months out of the year. The problem is those nine months are not set in stone. Depending on the amount of work needing to be done, the maintenance closures for the two water parks can change from year to year. I've revised the lede and the infobox to reflect that the parks operate year-round, save for a yearly maintenance closure that will take place in either the fall or winter, and that the sister park will be open during that time. This should eliminate the need to change it whenever the schedule changes, and since we are not a travel guide, it's not up to us to provide the up-to-the-moment schedule for the parks anyway. Thoughts? --McDoobAU93 14:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disney's Typhoon Lagoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050331090518/http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/wdw/parks/parkLanding?id=TLLandingPage to http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/wdw/parks/parkLanding?id=TLLandingPage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the information that the link in reference 5 is no longer present on the page, and I'm unable to find the information on the page using the Wayback Machine. Might be best to remove the reference or replace it with something else, unless someone else can find the information on the Wayback Machine. Semisoftware (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]