Talk:Brooker Highway

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Tasmania / Transport Low‑importance Brooker Highway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Australian Roads: Tasmania Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics: /  Tasmania This article needs a map. This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

"and is Tasmania's busiest and shortest highway." - can it indeed be considered a highway, seeing it's essentialy part of the midlands highway, which would make both the Arthur and Esk highways the shortest (~90km each)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.168.112.116 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

It uses the "1" designation, but that doesn't make it part of the Midlands highway - the Bass Highway also uses the "1" symbol. -- Chuq 03:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• If you read the Federal Goverment's National Highway Funding websites, you would see that the brooker highway is a Highway in its own right. Wiki ian 02:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some one should add a section (or sub-seciton) about the plane landing on the highway a week ago (April 2010).--TinTin (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

$ince thi$ i$ one of the top ten earner$ for the $tate government'$ $peed camera$, $houldn't the page include $peed limit data? mo$t of it i$ 80KM and 100KM, ALTHOUGH THE $TART AND END ARE 60KM. One $mall $ection between the junction of main road at ro$etta and the Berridale road $ection was rezoned recently from 100km down to 80km, again you have to a$k why... jolt76 (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, these may be of interest:

-- Chuq (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brooker Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080213030408/http://www.news.com.au:80/mercury/story/0,22884,23192532-3462,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/mercury/story/0,22884,23192532-3462,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]