Talk:Bangarang

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Release Date

What is it now, a 2011 single or a 2012 single? Release date and category are not consistent. -- Firefox13 (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Producer

Can idiots stop putting up that Dr Dre & Tylias produced this song. Yes, they produce alot of songs that are popular but they don't produce every song in the world, and they certainly did NOT produce Bangarang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.212.143.202 (talk) 09:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sales

What is the current sales of this song?--94.0.97.43 (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This may be unimportant, but...

Guys What Is The Message Of The Song????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lost boys are rowdy, toy cars are quite capable of producing large amounts of bass, and Fun Dip is awesome! 203.129.23.146 (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Boom Ad Doesn't Exist

There is a mentioning of this song being played in a Sonic Boom ad. I have searched and I haven't seen any evidence of this. Should this be removed? Grigrass (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. The dab page will be deleted and replaced with a hat note. Cúchullain ^t/c 19:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bangarang (song) → Bangarang – Only two topics - both by Skrillex, so the disambiguation page is not needed - and the song is more notable. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Unreal7 (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment according to wiktionary, there's also a common noun meaning for this term, for which, we have articles argument and several different disturbance ones. It also appears to be associated with the movie "Hook" [1] -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - at first sight oppose, there doesn't seem to be any evidence in Google Books that the song is the absolute majority of meaning for this term. And really a move of this type shouldn't even be proposed without a Google Book search in the proposal. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question to Unreal7 - What makes the song more notable then the album, and why wouldn't this be a case of just 2 disambiguations?--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Only two topics - a song and an EP that are by the same artist. So having a disambiguation page is pointless here. The song is the first bit of information you get when you Google "bangarang". Unreal7 (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that is fair, in which case I would support.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support, the song is more notable than the associated EP. O N R (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per PRIMARY. CookieMonster755 ^(talk) 18:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bangarang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard

The Billboard article goes to writer "Nadastrom", a DJ/producers (Contributor, not part of Billboard staff in this case), and I have no idea why. 183.171.123.78 (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- hi, not sure but it looks like the article was selfwritten by Nada, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]