Talk:Artemis I
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artemis I article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Artemis I was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 16, 2022. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
On 4 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Artemis 1 to Artemis I. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 4 September 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Artemis 1 → Artemis I
- Artemis 2 → Artemis II
- Artemis 3 → Artemis III
- Artemis 4 → Artemis IV
- Artemis 5 → Artemis V
– NASA has consistently used roman numerals for Artemis mission names. We currently, and somewhat awkwardly, reference this in the first line of each page.
- For example: "Artemis 3, officially Artemis III, is...".
For the sake of accuracy and simplicity, I would like to propose we move the pages to use the same roman numeral convention. RickyCourtney (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, consistency with Wikipedia titles referring to the Apollo program, Project Gemini, and Project Mercury, etc. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- According to a reference cited on the pages, NASA has addressed this discrepancy: "While Apollo mission patches used numbers and roman numerals throughout the program, Artemis mission names will use a roman numeral convention."[1] -- RickyCourtney (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Most of Gemini's patches contained only Roman numerals but its 12 missions are still remembered and commonly known, as well as titled on Wikipedia, with simple numbers. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Using Roman numerals meets the Naturalness guideline because it's the convention NASA actually uses. I got here today because I was searching for "Artemis III". You can't be consistent with both the actual name and the standards used for previous programs, and the actual name makes more sense. Jwolfe (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes the Naturalness guideline applies; does NASA (a primary source) determine what's 'natural?' See: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=%22Artemis%203%22,%22Artemis%20III%22&hl=en for a sense of what's natural. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 10:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd search Artemis 3 too. That's just because it's easier to type, just like you would search SLS instead of Space Launch System. Narnianknight (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes the Naturalness guideline applies; does NASA (a primary source) determine what's 'natural?' See: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=%22Artemis%203%22,%22Artemis%20III%22&hl=en for a sense of what's natural. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 10:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Whotookthatguy (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Official NASA convention is more important than any other factor. Narnianknight (talk) 12:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per NASA convention. 21 Andromedae (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as it is an established use; decimal numerals would still be used as redirects. This may not be consistent with other NASA programs, but that's not our problem: if the primary source is not consistent, we have no reason to enforce such consistency for them Cambalachero (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Astronomy/Moon task force, WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force, WikiProject Spaceflight, and WikiProject Astronomy have been notified of this discussion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Artemis : brand book (Report). Washington, D.C.: NASA. 2019. NP-2019-07-2735-HQ.
MISSION NAMING CONVENTION. While Apollo mission patches used numbers and roman numerals throughout the program, Artemis mission names will use a roman numeral convention.
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
[edit]Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Artemis I Launch (NHQ202211160017).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 16, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-11-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 23:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Artemis I was an uncrewed Moon-orbiting mission that was launched on November 16, 2022. It was the first major spaceflight of NASA's Artemis program and marked the agency's return to lunar exploration since the Apollo program after 5 decades. It was the first flight test of the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the missions main objective was to test the Orion spacecraft in preparation for future Artemis missions. Artemis I was launched from Launch Complex 39B at the Kennedy Space Center. After reaching orbit, the upper stage separated and performed a trans-lunar injection before releasing Orion and ten CubeSat satellites. Orion completed one flyby of the Moon on November 21 and completed a second flyby on December 5. This picture shows Artemis I launching from Launch Complex 39B Photograph credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky
Recently featured:
|
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class spaceflight articles
- High-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Moon articles
- High-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- B-Class Solar System articles
- High-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report