Talk:Aligarh

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Cities / Uttar Pradesh / Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance). Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

The lead mentions that it used to be referred to as Kol or Koil. Are these exclusive? Does anyone know the difference? If it was a different time when it had different spelling I think it would be good to note that because they are currently used interchangeably in the history section. Picking one would be great for consistency. Cleanelephant (talk) 08:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150521192726/http://epaper.jagran.com/epaper/29-jan-2015-36-aligarh-archive-edition-aligarh-city-Page-4.html to http://www.epaper.jagran.com/epaper/29-jan-2015-36-aligarh-archive-edition-aligarh-city-Page-4.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could somebody with a nice Indian accent please re-record the audio pronunciation aid? The sound quality in the recording we have is poor. I can't make out exactly how the speaker realizes the <h>. --Doric Loon (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rao Lakshya Pratap Singh:. Instead of changing sourced content, discuss your concerns here and gain WP:CONSENSUS. Bring sources as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]