Talk:24 cm Haubitze 39

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force European military history task force German military history task force World War II task force

What needs to be footnoted here? Everything not in Hogg or Chamberlain & Ellis has a cite already. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, mate. The ammunition section does not have any in line citations, so if these could be added it would improve the article. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added a B class checklist to the article. There is some good content, however, I believe that the article could be improved by addressing the following:

• referencing and citation - as per above, not all paragraphs have an in line citation. For a B class there needs to be at least one in line citation per paragraph;
• coverage - accuracy seems fine (although I'm no expert so probably can't assess that part properly), however, I think the article needs more content in relation to service history. Whilst there is some, I think it could be fleshed out a little more. e.g. campaigns it was used in, length of service, performance, etc.;
• grammar - the article needs a copy edit for grammar and style. A number of sentences begin with the pronoun 'it', which I do not believe is appropriate because it does not specify what is being talked about; and
• images - an image would greatly improve the value of this article.

Just some suggestions. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 24 cm Haubitze 39. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302080523/http://sturmvogel.orbat.com/GermWeapProd.html to http://sturmvogel.orbat.com/GermWeapProd.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090321120330/http://sturmvogel.orbat.com/artillery.html to http://sturmvogel.orbat.com/artillery.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]