Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Submarine Voyage

This page is not a forum for general discussion about 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Submarine Voyage. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Submarine Voyage at the Reference desk.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disney Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Fantasyland#Expansion|Fantasyland Expansion]] The anchor (#Expansion) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Gave the 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea article the overhaul and updating it deserves. Hope this one's better. --UD75 01:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Co-ordination
	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that: the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. the article has multiple overlapping problems. the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.
Discussion [edit]

Other than, I suppose, the description of the attraction itself, what needs cleaning up? --UD75 18:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20kposter.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"However, several conspiracy theories of deliberate sabotage by Walt Disney World Resort Operations persist to this day."

If it is going to be mentioned at all then please state what the conspiracy theories are. Otherwise this is simply cryptic.

This seems a basically good article, but it needs a careful copy-edit - "At 11.5 million US gallons (44,000 m3) of water throughout, it was one of the biggest and most expensive Disney attractions ever conceived." for example makes no sense, even if it hung together grammatically. Size and expense aren't measured in gallons of water. Rich Farmbrough, 18:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Article has been tagged for needing sources since 2009. Please feel free to re-add the below material with appropriate citations. DonIago (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems very odd to me that these two attractions share a page. Despite sharing source material, they're very different ride experiences and stories, and the TDS version is certainly not a clone of the MK version. They also do not share a name; the TDS does not append 'Submarine Voyage' to the end. I suspect that maybe someone unfamiliar with the Tokyo attraction has grouped them together based solely on the name and IP.

At the very least, this page needs two sections, one for each version of the attraction. I would personally argue they need separate pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.249.151 (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean? Just wondering.

204.48.46.11 (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the wording given that Grey doesn't mention the Cold War and no sourcing was provided. DonIago (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]