Talk:Aimery of Cyprus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aimery of Cyprus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	Aimery of Cyprus has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 10, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2019, April 1, 2021, and April 1, 2024.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Cyprus Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cyprus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cyprus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyprusWikipedia:WikiProject CyprusTemplate:WikiProject CyprusCypriot articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages: Crusades Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Crusades task force. Military history: Biography / Middle East / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Middle Eastern military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Gerald Waldo Luis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 5 January 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Our own List of coats of arms of the House of Lusignan does not give the arms shown as pertaining to Aimery's reign. Hill, p. 69, says the Lusignans in Cyprus used a lion gules on a barruly field argent and azure, as in the image at right. Srnec (talk) 22:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished with my copedits. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good work!--Dthomsen8 (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "Painter 1950" reference does not link to a full citation. Does anyone here care to sort that out? It may be a typo (multiple times), or it may refer to a source that is not listed and might be findable in the article's history. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the content referenced, title, and page numbers, it's pretty clear that this should be pointed at Painter, 1957; I've fixed accordingly. Choess (talk) 15:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is "erroneous" about the name stuff? Isn't this just different ways of rendering the same name? Why is "Aimery" correct and "Amalric" incorrect?

No, etymologically different names, although they are sufficiently close that they have long been confused or treated as variants of one another. The viscounts of Narbonne used both and it leads to a lot of confusion, but the primary documents distinguish Aimericus and Amalricus consistently, I believe. It's actually explained in the "Early life" section of this article. It used to be in the lead. The "popularity" of the mistake in this case seems to come from Runciman. Srnec (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. john k (talk) 21:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I add an Ahnentafel (ancestors tree), but user Surtsicna remove it. Additionaly, she makes ungry comments. Her arguments are wrong (e.g. she said the ahnentafel has only males); what I do is similar to what exists in other pages here in WP. I cannot understand why she deletes all this stuff. Do we interested to improve the texts or not? Aris de Methymna (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOR. We are not here to add unverified information to the text. Borsoka (talk) 02:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]