User talk:Fuzheado
Hello Andrew, a late welcome at the Commons ;-) and thanks for your photos from the Wikimania. I've some little hints for you.
Could you please put further images directly into one of the galleries here? And it would be more convenient if you write photo by [[User: Fuzheado|Andrew Lih]]
instead of only raw text (this is useful for other projects which use the commons images, see the information on meta:Image:Wikimania05-banner.jpg for example. And you could use the Babel tags on your user page for interested people with questions - I always suggest that because Commons is a really international project, not because the boxes are so nice ... I don't even like them ;-)
Regards --:Bdk: 08:55, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Hey Andrew, regarding your Wikimania photos - could you put license into these photos, which don't have it yet? The photos are simply great, and I'd love to use them in some Wikinews articles, but I can't do it before you'll choose a license for them. Much appreciated! Datrio 19:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Image:Aeron-seat.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]Image deletion warning | Image:Aeron-seat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Roxana Saberi speaking.jpg was uncategorized on 4 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Jerry Coyne, American professor of biology at the University of Chicago.jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
File:John Brockman portrait.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Blurred Lines (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]Category:American Art Edit-a-Thon 2015
Regards,
Sixty Four
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fuzheado. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fuzheado~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
20:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Changing type sizes on Commons:Simple media reuse guide
[edit]Hi
Thanks very much for trying to fix the section heading font on Commons:Simple media reuse guide, unfortunately what you changed broke the headings for desktop view (made the text really really big) so I've reverted it. I'm not sure what was wrong but please do have another go if you like, happy to check it on different resolution screens if its helpful.
Cheers
John Cummings (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
New version of File:Coleco-adam.jpg at File:Coleco Adam (adjusted version).jpg
[edit]Hi there,
Thanks for uploading your image File:Coleco-adam.jpg; it seems to have become the standard one for most articles covering that computer!
I thought you ought to know that I've uploaded a slightly tweaked version under the new filename File:Coleco Adam (adjusted version).jpg. If there's anything you don't like about this or the way it was done, feel free to alter the upload page- it's still your image.
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hay Festival 2016
[edit]i went and added "source = own" to your Hay festival photos. cheers. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 18:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Slowking4: - Hey thanks, good idea! -- Fuzheado (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
We'd love your feedback on Pattypan uploader!
[edit]Hi! We are about to sum up our "Pattypan uploader" project (or, at least, its first stage). Yarl released the new version 0.3 a few weeks ago, and we are looking for user feedback. Thank you very much for being one of the main users and uploaders! Please let us know what works, what can be improved; any other suggestions or comment is very welcome. We are gathering comments in the form of online survey here - we'd be grateful for your feedback. Thank you! --Marta Malina Moraczewska
Copyright status: File:Hongkong-panorama-icc-2013-0808.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hongkong-panorama-icc-2013-0808.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Billclinton-portrait-nelsonshanks.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— fourthords | =Λ= | 22:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikimania selfie
[edit]Hey Andrew. It was lovely to catch up with you at Wikimania as always! Deryck Chan (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Wikidatacon 2017: Workshop documentation
[edit]Thanks for your participation in the "Share and document workflows to improve Wikidata's use experience"-Workshop. The workflows were very helpful already to understand common patterns of editors’ edit workflow. At the on commons you find all workflows as well as some analysis and a summary of them --Jan Dittrich (WMDE) (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:GTP-trophy-2018.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GTP-trophy-2018.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Didym (talk) 13:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Margaret Mead at Smithsonian.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Margaret Mead at Smithsonian.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Margaret Mead at Smithsonian.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
New translation of Wikidata in brief
[edit]Hello! I would like to inform you that I translated your "Wikidata-in-brief" brochure to Ukrainian language, so here it is File:Коротко про Вікідані.pdf --JTs (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- @JTs: - Wonderful! Thanks for letting me know, and please do let me know how you wind up using it. Regards. -- Fuzheado (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Arsenal Firearms Strike One (18258300744).jpg
- File:Benelli MP3S 9mm (32795518205).jpg
- File:Beretta Billennium 9mm (31952453764).jpg
- File:Beretta Billennium 9mm (32795535565).jpg
- File:Bernardelli VB Practical 9mm (32795519385).jpg
- File:Colt National Match Gold Cup (19450305379).jpg
- File:Colt Python and pre-70 National Match (19414822832).jpg
- File:Delta AR Top Gun (18636815068).jpg
- File:Delta AR Top Gun (18638416719).jpg
- File:Delta AR Top Gun (18798293856).jpg
- File:Delta AR Top Gun (18798295566).jpg
- File:Delta AR Top Gun (18798296656).jpg
- File:First-year H&K USP 9mm (32415150000).jpg
- File:H&K USP CT, .45 ACP (25625290736).jpg
- File:H&K USP Elite 45 (31981312683).jpg
- File:H&K USP Elite, Expert, 9mm (21090595098).jpg
- File:H&K USP Tactical (29091436595).jpg
- File:H&K USP Tactical, 9mm (25532751202).jpg
- File:H&K USP, .40 S&W (25651476705).jpg
- File:HK P7 M13 (20965360961).jpg
- File:HK USP Compact 357 SIG (19447160405).jpg
- File:HK USP Elite and Expert 9mm with Merkle Tuning weights (20965366061).jpg
- File:HK USP Elite, 9mm (21267935622).jpg
- File:Korriphila HSP 701 (20335338274).jpg
- File:Korriphila HSP 701 (20771165649).jpg
- File:Korth Combat - 75mp (18638360629).jpg
- File:Korth Combat 4" (18636752278).jpg
- File:Manurhin MR93 357 Magnum (32415101410).jpg
- File:Mateba 2006M 357 Magnum (32755252546).jpg
- File:Mateba MTR-8 - 75mp (18637717658).jpg
- File:Mateba MTR-8 - 80mp (18689590808).jpg
- File:Mateba MTR-8 clips (18256962413).jpg
- File:Pardini GT9 (18636868838).jpg
- File:Pardini GT9 (18636916850).jpg
- File:Pardini GT9 (18798356036).jpg
- File:Pardini GT9 field stripped (18824611245).jpg
- File:Phillips and Rodgers Medusa (18773326253).jpg
- File:Phillips and Rodgers Medusa (19206350050).jpg
- File:Phillips and Rodgers Medusa (19206362128).jpg
- File:Phillips and Rodgers Medusa (19206364858).jpg
- File:Rockstead Shin DLC (18879796699).jpg
- File:S&W PPC9 Target Champion (20769881080).jpg
- File:Sig X6 Supermatch with X-mount weight (20769973698).jpg
- File:Sig X6 Supermatch with X-mount weight (20771177309).jpg
- File:Smith and Wesson, Target Champion 9mm, detail (21090403400).jpg
- File:Smith and Wesson, Target Champion 9mm, detail (21091603679).jpg
- File:Smith and Wesson, Target Champion 9mm, detail (21267946562).jpg
- File:Smith and Wesson, Target Champion 9mm, left (20655796914).jpg
- File:Smith and Wesson, Target Champion 9mm, right (21090403820).jpg
- File:Steyr SA1,S-A1, HK USP Compact, HK P2000SK (25625296866).jpg
- File:Two Mateba MTR-8s (19094915145).jpg
- File:Vektor CP1 (25355876700).jpg
- File:Vektor SP1 (25283916329).jpg
- File:Walther P5 Compact (20931674426).jpg
- File:Walther P5 Lang (18636894980).jpg
- File:Walther P5 Lang (18636895860).jpg
- File:Walther P88 with Nill wood grips (32415095370).jpg
Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
File:The Bride Stripped Bare By Her Bachelors, Even.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Alinea (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Portrait (Dulcinea).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coldcreation (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
[edit]
Hi Fuzheado, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dyolf77 - Thanks much! -- Fuzheado (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Frank Campbell of Georgetown 272 - ca 1900 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi, Stop adding this on [1]. You were already reverted twice. Next time you will be blocked. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- You need to qualify your claim of "dishonesty" on the mailing list. That's a serious assumption of bad faith on your part - David Gerard (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Interior at Nice.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Alinea (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:The+Buddhist+Guardian+Mahabala+MET+1995.570.4.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:The+Buddhist+Guardian+Mahabala+MET+1995.570.4.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:The+Buddhist+Guardian+Mahabala+MET+1995.570.4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:The+Doll+Festival,+Third+Day+of+the+Third+Month+MET+JP1980.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:The+Doll+Festival,+Third+Day+of+the+Third+Month+MET+JP1980.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:The+Doll+Festival,+Third+Day+of+the+Third+Month+MET+JP1980.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 02:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, we have received a complaint that this photo of yours is not Horatio Claire. Please advise, could this photo be mis-identified? JGHowes talk 19:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Hayfestival-2016-Horatio-Clare.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JGHowes talk 12:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC Rudy Speaking closeup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SCP-2000 04:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
- File:1-6-21 Pres Trump Stop Election Fraud Rally (50807638817).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710498).jpg
- File:1-6-21 Pres Trump Stop Election Fraud Rally (50807525196).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807568872).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454721).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454796).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710523).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454811).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454826).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710653).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710618).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454916).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807454976).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807569187).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710783).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710728).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710768).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807455046).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50807455126).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710823).jpg
- File:Jan 6 2021 Pres Trump Rally Live DC (50806710893).jpg
Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 04:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vehicles on the Streets of Tokyo - MET JP3378.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Vehicles on the Streets of Tokyo - MET JP3378.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vehicles on the Streets of Tokyo - MET JP3378.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Wasim-akram-gesf-2018-7878.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Wasim-akram-gesf-2018-7878.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Bathers by a River.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thuresson (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Lemons on a Pewter Plate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thuresson (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Apples (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thuresson (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just for to avoid trouble I suggest requesting permission at Commons:Bots/Requests before running the bot. All the best, Achim (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, the bot is currently only operating on Wikidata and not Commons, but when the time comes I'll be sure to do so. Cheers. -- Fuzheado (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
METbot edits not marked as bot edits
[edit]Hi. METbot's edits are not marked as bot edits. Also not as wikidata edits. This is making it difficult to impossible to see other edits in the commons watchlist at present. --Mirokado (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I'll look into this, as I thought since METbot was put in the bot group, this was happening automatically. - Fuzheado (talk) 00:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience - I've tested this out and will manually set the bot flag from the next batch job onwards. -- Fuzheado (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- And thank you. The latest changes are marked as bot edits. --Mirokado (talk) 22:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stevenson Memorial-saam 1929.6.127.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Stevenson Memorial-saam 1929.6.127.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stevenson Memorial-saam 1929.6.127.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 03:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Thoughts about posting 1926 to 1977 artwork with no known copyright notice?
[edit]Hi Fuzheado, I've been working recently on uploading images of Public Domain images from the Vanderbilt Fine Arts Gallery. Most are old (pre-1926 inception or artist died 100y+), but there are a small number with inception dates between 1926 and 1977 that were flagged as Public Domain by our former collections manager with the reason "no known copyright". I asked her what criterion she used to make the determination of Public Domain, and she said she searched and there were no copyright notices taken out by the artist's estate. One possible course of action in this situation would be to upload such works with the assumption that if we made a mistake, they would be taken down. However, we are aware of the difficulties of reliably searching copyright registries and don't want to ruin our reputation by unintentionally posting works that are actually still in copyright. Based on your knowledge about uploading artwork images to Commons, do you know what is the typical practice followed by art museums for works in this category? Post in good faith and ask forgiveness when mistaken, or be more cautious and don't post at all? Baskaufs (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jerry Coyne, American professor of biology at the University of Chicago.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jerry Coyne, American professor of biology at the University of Chicago.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, Joofjoof (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Chocolate Grinder (No. 1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Racconish 💬 05:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
PanoViewer error
[edit]Hello Fuzheado,
I have a problem with PanoViewer and unfortunately I don't know who to ask. It's about this picture:
Leipzig Specks Hof 2022 - 360°×180° spherical panorama of atrium B
The error message is: "Database error (found 0 results; should be 1) No pannellum config return"
Is the error known? What can I do or what am I doing wrong? Who can I contact?
Many thanks in advance for your answer --Joachim Köhler (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hey there hopefully you found it works now? Yes, I also had that weird error message for a while but it went away. - Fuzheado (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, the cause I found after trying is a plus sign "+" in the file name. If you avoid this, then it works. Best regards --Joachim Köhler (talk) 18:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Please test new feature on the ISA Tool (computer-aided tagging)
[edit]Hello
We have just released a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.
We are currently looking for feedback with regards to the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place. In a second stage, we will be testing the quality of the recommandations provided.
We deeply appreciate your feedback, since it will help us determine the next steps of the project.
Please sign-up to indicate interest, test the tool, and simply provide feedback in the talk page.
More information on the new feature and test campaign: Commons:ISA Tool/Image to Concept
Thank you in advanceǃ
File:Landscape at L'Estaque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
El Grafo (talk) 10:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Stuffed Shirts (Les Plastrons).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Anvilaquarius (talk) 19:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
ISA Tool Workshop - Dec 12th 2022
[edit]Greetings.
We released a few weeks ago a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.
Now we are looking for feedback with regards to
- the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place.
- and most importantly, the quality of the recommandations provided.
This is why we are organizing an online workshop on Monday 12th of December, 16h-17h30 UTC+1 (on zoom). We will be very happy if you find the time to join us.
More information and sign-up : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:ISA_Tool/Image_to_Concept#ISA_Workshop_-_Dec_12th
Thank you in advanceǃ
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2020-02 Smithsonian sample image - Knowledge Graph - 2021 Q1.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2020-02 Smithsonian sample image - Knowledge Graph - 2021 Q1.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Merrell-twins-gesf-2018-7824-large.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi can you tell me more about this? It was my photo and I put the CC-BY-SA license on there correctly. - Fuzheado (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Houses at Chatou.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Not in public domain as author died less than 70 years ago)
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Zen 38.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Met object 465124
[edit]The image in Commons doesn't match the Met object - can you check please? The correct Met object is at File:Bird-Shaped Brooch MET DP30141.jpg. PKM (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Problem with PanoViewer display
[edit]
Hello Fuzheado,
since about 29 May 2023 (exact date unknown) spherical panoramas are displayed incorrectly in the PanoViewer. As I have tested the panoramas on my PC before and as sphere panoramas uploaded before this date still work, I have absolutely no idea why it does not work anymore at the moment. (Note: PanoViewer calls did not work at all for a few days from 29 May).
- Example correct rendering (uploaded 17 April):
- example incorrect rendering (uploaded 29 May):
I have enough more examples, if needed see: here
Do you have any idea what the problem could be? What can I try to find the error? Thanks in advance for your answer. Best regards --Joachim Köhler (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Fuzheado, the problem has been fixed in the meantime and the panoramas are displayed correctly again. Many greetings --Joachim Köhler (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Please respond
[edit]To my question at MediaWiki talk:Copyupload-allowed-domains#Allowlist request for Smithsonian. Thanks, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
VRT email
[edit]Please send an email to COM:VRT for the NMACC India photos as requested at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nmacc-2023-0331-Salman Khan.jpg, and ping me if you have done so. Otherwise I will delete the photos soon. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Is Category:Wrong SDC still in use? - Jmabel ! talk 01:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not that I can tell, so it can be removed. Thanks for asking. - Fuzheado (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest
[edit]English
[edit]Dear Fuzheado,
We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!
We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.
You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports
Spanish
[edit]Hola Fuzheado,
Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.
Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.
Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.
Portuguese
[edit]Olá Fuzheado,
Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!
Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.
Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.
Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2023-1112-wcna-feedback.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:2023-1112-wcna-feedback.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2023-1112-wcna-feedback.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you
[edit]Dear fellow Commons photographer,
I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.
At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} (if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available) or {{SD|C1}} (if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused). In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Wonderful image
[edit]I have to say, given you probably had a time constraint in taking this photo, it is really well shot! I wish I had your skill in photography! - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!
[edit]Hello Fuzheado !,
Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.
Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.
So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!
Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.
Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!
Best regards,
Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Photomicrograph of a flea 5229656650 fea4ceb3a9 b d.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Photomicrograph of a flea 5229656650 fea4ceb3a9 b d.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Photomicrograph of a flea 5229656650 fea4ceb3a9 b d.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Nutshinou Talk! 02:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024
[edit]Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.
I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.
All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you answer some questions related to the MET?
[edit]I've been working on diffusing Category:Department of European Paintings, Metropolitan Museum of Art, and there are some things I'm not sure of. Might you be able to help? I'll just go ahead and ask about one, but feel free to say if you don't feel comfortable answering.
Does the Department of European Paintings include all European countries? Some of the European countries in Category:Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art by country aren't listed under the department category. Ones not listed include (but are not limited to) Belgian, Swedish, Swiss, and Portuguese. Russia is a bicontinental country, but although the Russian category is under Asian paintings, there are paintings by Russian artists under the European category.
I've come across some other things that may be general art questions as opposed to MET-specific, but I'll leave those for now. Just getting some input on the one I asked would be a big help.
Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Where is Beretta?
[edit]Hello, there is not a Beretta gun on the picture, there is just the holster. Pạtạfisik 12:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Minor barnstar | |
…. Kierandude (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Pulitzer2018-mia-farrow-20180530-wp.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pulitzer2018-mia-farrow-20180530-wp.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024 - Group photo, 360 cam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
196.190.61.113 19:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Letter from Selena at the Village Pump
[edit]Hi Fuzheado, I hope you're fine. Since you participated at the Commons meeting at Wikimania, I wanted to flag a potentially interesting discussion at the Village Pump, started by Selena Deckelmann about finding a better way of supporting Commons. Maybe you can consider, if you have time, to share your thoughts? Thanks in advance! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice, I'll take a look! - Fuzheado (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Your series of author images from the 2024 National Book Festival is excellent! Nv8200p (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks for that, much appreciated! - Fuzheado (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2024
[edit]Hello! In 2023, you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Thanks to people like you, we had over 250 participants contributing over 2,400 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen yet, you can view the top-ten winners of the US competition here.
I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in the United States through the month of October, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our event page for more information.
Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2023, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you have any questions, please leave them on the event talk page.
Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)