User talk:Chris-martin

Hi, I noticed you uploaded a fixed version of Image:Water molecule dimensions.svg which I had started on. Just wonder what tool you did use as I had some trouble getting the arrowheads to show up ? /Daniel78 17:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just used Inkscape. I'm not aware of any arrowheads built into SVG, so I just drew them in myself. ~ Booyabazooka 23:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow light 142.127.6.36 15:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on Image:Praising-hands.svg! AnonMoos 05:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With pleasure I've just noticed that you've "converted" Image:A Yin-Yang-Yuan Symbol - Triality-One.png to Image:A Yin-Yang-Yuan Symbol - Triality-One.svg, which I intended to do myself occasionally. Considering how difficult my first experience doing that with Image:A TransGender-Symbol Plain3.png to Image:A TransGender-Symbol Plain3.svg (because of “center-circle” transparency) was, I'm very curious about how you do such “conversions”. Did you do it manually (with Inkscape) or use some kind of software-tool? -- ParaDox 01:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do everything in Inkscape, usually manually. With that one, it was tough to get the three pieces to fit together well. I started with a circle, converted it to a path, and added the tail; then I cloned it to make three of them, rotated them into place, fidgeted with the path until it looked right, and finally delinked the clones to change their colors. You really just need to spend enough time with Inkscape to get used to manipulating paths; it's a pretty awesome tool. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 16:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx very much for your detailed answer :-)  I also want to let you know that I've made my own SVG-version in the mean time. If you should respond, then please do so on the image-talk-page. -- ParaDox 18:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you converted the "wrong" version of the PNG to SVG -- the original (and probably more broadly applicable) version of the PNG is at Image:P religion.png ... AnonMoos 02:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I really don't know what the symbol on the right is, for either version (dumb American, I am...). Can you perhaps enlighten me? ~ Booya ^Bazooka 06:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original Image:P religion.png has the Islamic star and crescent at right, while Image:P religion world.svg is based on a revised version of the PNG (uploaded to English Wikipedia) with the Ayyavazhi lotus and flame at right. Ayyavazhi seems to have a surprisingly strong Wikipedia presence, but its overall historical or social influence can't really be compared to that of Islam, so that it's not as suitable to be included in a very simple and selective graphic representing world religions. See Religious symbol for some graphics representing common religious symbols (including those in the images). AnonMoos 18:56, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'll be changing it, then. Thanks. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 21:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. AnonMoos 14:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hai Friend, I found that you created this --> image. I don't know how to make SVG Images. So can you please create an image for me with the same back ground as the above with this --> image. (i.e) The second plain image with the back-ground (and shadow) of the first image.

Also if you can please tell me How to make SVG Images. Thank you. - Vaikunda Raja 19:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you've marked this picture (and few others) as a duplicate/s. Could you please replace it\them on all (or few) projects it\they is\are used in? Thanks in advance, -- odder 14:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:P_videogame_controller.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. odder 11:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your revert of Image:Factory.svg? No hard feelings, although I thought my gradient addition was an improvement. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 21:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The gradient doesn't work well when the image is used as a small icon in a stub template in en.wiki. But you could re-upload the gradient-version under a different filename. --Abu badali 16:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Booyabazooka, what a great image! Wow... ← Körnerbrötchen » ✉ 12:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Multichill (talk) 09:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not sure about deletion. Doesn't the copyright cover just Rubik's named or logoed photos?

"The RUBIK'S CUBE® in its three dimensional form and any graphic or photographic representation of it, in any configuration, coloured or uncoloured, whether it carries the RUBIK'S CUBE® name or logo, is protected by intellectual property laws throughout the world." Source: http://www.rubiks.com/Image%20Rights.aspx . Michal

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Chris-martin!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Tech4.svg is uncategorized since 7 May 2009.

Hi, it would be really helpful if you released File:P blank.svg under PD-self. I'm having trouble because I can't combine the template with LGPL images for example. This template is so widely derivatived, so it would really help. --Beao 18:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sabcat2.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sabcat2.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Rubik's cube v3.svg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!

Good evening,

My name is Lotte Baltussen, and I work at the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. We are the archive of Dutch public broadcasters and hold many other types of audiovisual heritage as well. We have recently opened our new exhibition "3FM Presents: Your Serious Radio", which looks back at the last 50 years of pop music on the radio.

One of the interactives of our exhibition is a videomapping installation that depicts a teen room. When visitors enter the exhibition, they provide information that builds up their profile: their year of birth, gender and the favourite radio show, song, musical genre from their teens. This information is used to recreate their teen room; a sparse white space with 25 different elements such as a white bed, desk, and couch that are projected upon when a visitor activates his or her profile. We've divided the teen room into 10 time periods: 1965-1969, 1970-1974 and so forth.

In creating the videomapping, we have used countless free to use images, textures and patterns, among which is your image of a Rubik's Cube. We'd like to thank you very much for making your content available and thus making it possible us to use it. You can find a complete overview of the content used here, a blog post about the whole process here and pictures of the videomapping here, so you can see your content in action.

Thanks again!

All best,

Lottebelice (talk) 20:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geoz wb en.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

106.68.125.203 09:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geoz wb en.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

106.68.125.203 09:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:P biology.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

83.101.15.145 13:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chris-martin,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Parallax_Example.svg/300px-Parallax_Example.svg.png) in this book (Chapter 6 , Figure 6.6). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.8.91.93 (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may use it. — chris-martin 16:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Broom icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tarle012 (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JonMars666 (talk) 02:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is useful to learn and practice at computer in home in free time we can sit and do like flowchart and Microsoft etc etc 2401:4900:376D:89CF:B54A:E52E:EFDB:21B6 00:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super to chat 2401:4900:376D:89CF:B54A:E52E:EFDB:21B6 01:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... und Dank wie du deine Hüftsache in so jungen Jahren bildlich dokumentiert und geteilt hast. Auch dein Verfahren das Röntgenbild abzubilden!

Im Nu hab ich so viel lernen dürfen, etwa über die Dynamische Hüftschraube.

Etwa damals, Mitte Aug. 2007 hab ich am Rennrad kraftig gehudelt, bin gefallen und mit der (halben) Energie einer halben Kurbelumdrehung gefühlt mit 3 km mit der Schulter gegen die Gehsteigkante geprellt. Von der Kugel des Oberarmknochens war eine Kalotte (Höhe etwa 1/4 des Kugeldurchmessers) abgesprengt sah ich später am Rö. Einen Hemdknopf auf, Hand rein, um den Arm zu entlasten. Zum Gesprächstermin, ein Glas Wasser und 3 km in die Klinik geradelt.

Fast ungeduldig hab ich auf das Handeln der Ärzte gewartet. "Wir möchten versuchen das Teilstück mit den Händen wieder in die Ausgangslage zu schieben." Alternative wäre ein Kunstgelenk gewesen, meinte Unfallchirurg Gumpert, damals LKH Graz.

Zu zweit mit Bleigummihandschuhen unter Live-Röntgen-Video haben sie mir das Stück wieder reingepuzzelt. Hab dabei fast auf den Schirm gesehen. Anhand von 2 Bildern sah ich: Vorher mindestens 5 mm Verschiebung und Spaltmaximum. Danach eher kleiner als 0,5 mm. Ich heilfroh. ...

4einhalb Monate (auch Physio) danach zu Sylvester bin ich von Kopf bis Zehen in Neoprenschaum (und mit einem Heliumballon in der Hand) als weitaus langsamster bei Aschach quer über die Donau geschwommen. Meine Schulter wurde wieder perfekt. Verneige mich vor dem Können der Ärzte und der Heilfähigkeit des Körpers mit 51.

Ähnlichen Erfolg wünsch ich dir für deine Hüfte. Helium4 (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, according to the file page, it looks that you had a role in creating the logo of "Commonist". On the talk page, there is a discussion about this symbol as an icon for Commonist. Could you comment here or on the talk page, giving your opinion about the suitability of this symbol? Ziko van Dijk (talk) 08:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I converted this image to vector format, but otherwise I don't know anything at all about it or Commonist, sorry. 35.133.11.34 22:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Without your vectorization work at File:Cat silhouette.svg, all the cute kittens at the top of my user page wouldn't exist!

~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]