User talk:AntiCompositeBot/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The photographer clearly stated as per the quote given that the pictures he posted in the thread are free to use for any purpose, with URL given for verification. What else is needed? BP OMowe (talk) 11:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

I addetz a map with unknown author. But the date 1857 should be enough to explain why I use pd-old. Whoever made this maß is at least dead for 70 jears. Kersti (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kersti Nebelsiek Which file are you referring to? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

It looks like there is an accidental bot war going on here. You recently tagged a bunch of DPLA bot uploads as lacking license because it is now bringing in the license via a template. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Denver_City_Park._-_DPLA_-_a73b7525b815d742320382a1cb0591f8.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=803225662 for an example of an edit after which this bot got confused and thought there was no license tag. I would say that until you two work out how best to address this, your bot should not be tagging Dominic's bot's uploads as lacking licenses. - Jmabel ! talk 15:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

It wasn't either of the bots' at fault, actually. Someone made a breaking change on the template that was filling in the licensing tag, which I fixed after AntiCompositeBot tagged a bunch. They were missing licensing at the time, because of the edit, but should be all showing up correctly now. People really shouldn't make such edits without any testing. I am hoping the no-license tags get cleaned up eventually once the license tags are detected again? Dominic (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I'll do a VFC run. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Oof: "sandbox" in something that is really being used? That does not seem to me like a good idea. - Jmabel ! talk 16:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Hallo, die Freigabe steht unter Beschreibung -> Genehmigung und beim Hochladen wurde die Lizenzabfrage nicht eingeblendet Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 08:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

I uploaded the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fort_Wooton,CO.png for the Wiki Loves Monuments contest but failed to add a license. I've now corrected that, but don't know how to remove the deletion template. Would somebody tell me how to do it myself, so that I don't have to ask again if I make another mistake like this. JDavidZeff (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

@JDavidZeff I've cleaned up the file description page, added the Wiki Loves Monuments tag, and removed the deletion template. If you have more Wiki Loves Monuments files to upload, please use https://wikilovesmonuments.us/upload. Otherwise, I recommend using Special:UploadWizard to upload files. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: Is this normal bot behaviour? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes. The bot will tag files without a license until a valid license is applied. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: File:Wikipe-tan mouttest11.png has CC 4.0 BY-SA in the permission field. Is there a bug where the bot is unable to process this? JPxG (talk) 21:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@JPxG Not a bug. Permission templates are required to comply with the license. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: Is it possible to fix the bot so that, rather than editing the image information page and also editing my talk page to tell me to edit the information page, it just edits the image information page to replace, say, CC 4.0 BY-SA with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}? JPxG (talk) 22:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

https://github.com/AntiCompositeNumber/AntiCompositeBot/blob/master/src/nolicense.py Patches welcome. Please include tests showing it will detect every possible variation of every common license reliably and without false positives that would cause the bot to apply the wrong license tag. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

[1] was tagged for deletion for incorrect copyright info, but author and license are present. Please undo the tagging. --Jacek79_✇✇ 22:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

I see you added a license after the file was tagged. I have removed the deletion tag. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi:

A batch uploaded to Commons uses Template:license from structured data but the bot doesn't recognize it. Is this the expected behaviour? Thanks. Olea (LaOfi) (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

@Olea (LaOfi) There's a MediaWiki bug where {{License from structured data}} won't update unless the page is purged or edit after the structured data edit. I updated the bot configuration to ignore files with {{License from structured data}}, at least until that bug is fixed. I have also removed the deletion tags from those files. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Olea (LaOfi) (talk) 10:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Seems some images still has the nolicense template. At list this, this and this. Do you need my help? Olea (LaOfi) (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Done. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

This is a new file! Molarinoye09 (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

그만해~! 저렴한서비스비용 (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Please see: File:Paterson Inlet Whaka A Te Wera (cropped).jpg. It was released into public by the owner Jake Osborne per his flickr profile. Alexeyevitch (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Alexeyevitch (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Quisiera solicitar ayuda respecto al archivo "Escudo de Urumita-La Guajira.SVG" que fue marcado para eliminación automática por *AntiCompositeBot* debido a problemas con la licencia. Quiero aclarar que el escudo que intenté subir es la versión oficial del escudo municipal de Urumita, La Guajira, Colombia. Este escudo ha sido aprobado formalmente a través de un manual de identidad presentado ante el Concejo Municipal de Urumita, ([2]https://urumitaguajira.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/urumitaguajira/content/files/001121/56029_manual-de-identidad-visual--alcaldia-de-urumita-2024_collet.pdf) por lo que considero que es importante que esté disponible en la página de Wikipedia para representar adecuadamente al municipio. No tengo intención de infringir ninguna norma, y agradezco la notificación sobre la licencia.

A continuacion adjunto los links de los escudos que existen hoy dia en la wiki y que de alguna manera no han sido aprobados o han sido obsoletos Este es el primer Escudo que subieron: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Coat_of_arms_of_Urumita.png Este no fue aprobado por tener un indígena que no corresponde a nuestra región: https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Escudo_de_Urumita.svg Este no fue aprobado al no ser fiel al primero: https://assenath-urumitadesdeaqui.blogspot.com/2015/

Estoy dispuesto a proporcionar cualquier documentación adicional que sea necesaria para confirmar que el escudo es oficial y que puede ser usado en Wikipedia. Si me pueden orientar sobre cómo proceder para corregir el problema con la licencia y restaurar el archivo, se los agradecería mucho. Jesus Ariza Lopez (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)