×

Marginal values and returns to scale for nonparametric production frontiers. (English) Zbl 1336.90052

Summary: We present a unifying linear programming approach to the calculation of various directional derivatives for a very large class of production frontiers of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Special cases of this include different marginal rates, the scale elasticity, and a spectrum of partial and mixed elasticity measures. Our development applies to any polyhedral production technology including, to name a few, the conventional variable and constant returns-to-scale DEA technologies, their extensions with weight restrictions, technologies with weakly disposable undesirable outputs, and network DEA models. Furthermore, our development provides a general method for characterization of returns to scale (RTS) in any polyhedral technology. The new approach effectively removes the need to develop bespoke models for the RTS characterization and calculation of marginal rates and elasticity measures for each particular technology.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90C05 Linear programming

References:

[1] Atici KB, Podinovski VV (2012) Mixed partial elasticities in constant returns-to-scale production technologies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220(1):262-269. CrossRef · Zbl 1253.90120
[2] Atici KB, Podinovski VV (2015) Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical efficiency of units with different specialisations: An application to agriculture. Omega 54:72-83. CrossRef
[3] Balk BM, Färe R, Karagiannis G (2015) On directional scale elasticities. J. Productivity Anal. 43(1):99-104. CrossRef
[4] Banker RD (1984) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 17(1):35-44. CrossRef · Zbl 0538.90030
[5] Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1986) Piecewise loglinear estimation of efficient production surfaces. Management Sci. 32(1):126-135. Link · Zbl 0596.90011
[6] Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62(1):74-84. CrossRef · Zbl 0760.90001
[7] Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. 30(9):1078-1092. Link · Zbl 0552.90055
[8] Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Returns to scale in DEA. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J, eds. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis.2nd ed. (Springer Science + Business Media, New York), 41-70. CrossRef
[9] Chambers RG, Färe R (2008) A ”calculus” for data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 30(3):169-175. CrossRef
[10] Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 98(2):351-364. CrossRef · Zbl 0909.90040
[11] Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6):429-444. CrossRef · Zbl 0416.90080
[12] Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econometrics 30(1-2):91-107. CrossRef · Zbl 0582.90007
[13] Chen C-M, Delmas MA (2012) Measuring eco-efficiency: A new frontier approach. Oper. Res. 60(5):1064-1079. Link · Zbl 1257.91038
[14] Cook WD, Zhu J (2011) Multiple variable proportionality in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 59(4):1024-1032. Link · Zbl 1233.90186
[15] Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, 2nd ed. (Springer Science + Busines Media, New York). · Zbl 1111.90001
[16] Emrouznejad A, Anouze AL, Thanassoulis E (2010) A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200(1):297-304. CrossRef · Zbl 1183.90230
[17] Färe R, Grosskopf S (1985) A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scand. J. Econom. 87(4):594-604. CrossRef · Zbl 0581.90006
[18] Färe R, Grosskopf S (2004) New Directions: Efficiency and Productivity (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).
[19] Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (2004) Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(10):1023-1038. CrossRef · Zbl 1095.90052
[20] Fukuyama H (2000) Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125(1):93-112. CrossRef · Zbl 0971.90050
[21] Hadjicostas P, Soteriou AC (2006) One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168(2):425-449. CrossRef · Zbl 1101.90344
[22] Jones CN, Kerrigan EC, Maciejowski JM (2008) On polyhedral projection and parametric programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 138(2):207-220. CrossRef · Zbl 1211.90119
[23] Korhonen PJ, Soleimani-damaneh M, Wallenius J (2011) Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215(2):431-438. CrossRef · Zbl 1237.90114
[24] Krivonozhko VE, Førsund FR, Lychev AV (2014) Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232(3):664-670. CrossRef · Zbl 1305.90228
[25] Krivonozhko VE, Utkin OB, Volodin AV, Sablin IA, Patrin M (2004) Constructions of economic functions and calculations of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimization methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(10):1049-1058. CrossRef · Zbl 1095.90107
[26] Kuosmanen T (2005) Weak disposability in nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 87(4):1077-1082. CrossRef
[27] Kuosmanen T, Podinovski VV (2009) Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 91(2):539-545. CrossRef
[28] Mills HD (1952) Marginal values of matrix games and linear programs. Kuhn HW, Tucker AW, eds. Linear Equalities and Related Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 183-193.
[29] Olesen OB, Petersen NC (1996) Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: An extended facet approach. Management Sci. 42(2):205-219. Link · Zbl 0881.90003
[30] Podinovski VV (2004a) Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: Selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(3):265-276. CrossRef · Zbl 1097.91026
[31] Podinovski VV (2004b) Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(12):1311-1322. CrossRef · Zbl 1088.90033
[32] Podinovski VV (2009) Production technologies based on combined proportionality assumptions. J. Productivity Anal. 32(1):21-26. CrossRef
[33] Podinovski VV, Bouzdine-Chameeva T (2013) Weight restrictions and free production in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 61(2):426-437. Link · Zbl 1267.91048
[34] Podinovski VV, Førsund FR (2010) Differential characteristics of efficient frontiers in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 58(6):1743-1754. Link · Zbl 1231.90241
[35] Podinovski VV, Førsund FR, Krivonozhko VE (2009) A simple derivation of scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(1):149-153. CrossRef · Zbl 1157.90458
[36] Podinovski VV, Ismail I, Bouzdine-Chameeva T, Zhang W (2014) Combining the assumptions of variable and constant returns to scale in the efficiency evaluation of secondary schools. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(2):505-513. · Zbl 1339.91045
[37] Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ). CrossRef
[38] Roos C, Terlaky T, Vial JP (2005) Interior Point Methods for Linear Optimization (Springer Science + Business Media, New York).
[39] Rosen D, Schaffnit C, Paradi JC (1998) Marginal rates and two-dimensional level curves in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. 9(3):205-232. CrossRef
[40] Ruggiero J (2000) Nonparametric estimation of returns to scale in the public sector with an application to the provision of educational services. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(8):906-912. CrossRef · Zbl 1107.90380
[41] Sahoo BK, Zhu J, Tone K, Klemen BM (2014) Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233(3):584-594. CrossRef · Zbl 1339.90117
[42] Seiford LM, Thrall RM (1990) Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Econometrics 46(1-2):7-38. CrossRef · Zbl 0716.90015
[43] Shephard RW (1974) Indirect Production Functions (Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan), Mathematical Systems in Economics No. 10.
[44] Thanassoulis E, Portela MCS, Despić O (2008) Data envelopment analysis: The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS, eds. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth (Oxford University Press, New York), 251-420. CrossRef
[45] Tone K (2001) On returns to scale under weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 16(1):31-47. CrossRef
[46] Zelenyuk V (2013) A scale elasticity measure for directional distance function and its dual: Theory and DEA estimation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(3):592-600. CrossRef · Zbl 1317.90110
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.