×

Comparisons of several graphical methods for representing multivariate data. (English) Zbl 0625.62003

Graphical displays provide a powerful tool for presenting and studying many types of data. This article presents an evaluation of several special graphical methods for representing multivariate data, including three face-type methods and a function-plot method. The evaluation utilizes a split-plot-factorial experimental design. Under the conditions of this experiment, the modified Chernoff-face data-representation method is clearly superior.

MSC:

62-07 Data analysis (statistics) (MSC2010)
65C99 Probabilistic methods, stochastic differential equations

Software:

BMDP
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Lambertina, W. J.F.-T.; Louv, W. C., Comparisons of some graphical methods for exploring multivariate data analysis, Am. Statist., 38, 184-188 (1984)
[2] Flury, B.; Riedwyl, H., Graphical representation of multivariate data by means of asymmetrical faces, J. Am. statist. Ass., 76, 757-765 (1981)
[3] Moriarity, S., Communicating financial information through multidimensional graphics, J. Account. Res., 1, 17, 205-224 (1979)
[4] Hauck, W. W.; Anderson, S., A survey regarding the reporting of simulation studies, A. Statist., 38, 214-215 (1984)
[5] Turner, D. W.; Hall, K. A., GRAPHPAK: interactive graphics for analysis of multivariate data, (Proc. 15th Symp. on the Interface of Computer Science and Statistics (1983), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam), 328-332
[6] Cleveland, W. S.; Diaconis, P.; McGill, R., Variables on scatter plots look more highly correlated when the scales are increased, Science, 1138-1141 (1982)
[7] Cleveland, W. S.; Harris, C. S.; McGill, R., Judgment of circle sizes on statistical maps, J. Am. statist. Ass., 77, 379, 541-547 (1982)
[8] Chernoff, H., The use of faces to represent points in \(k\)-dimensional space graphically, J. Am. statist. Ass., 68, 362-368 (1973)
[9] Hammer, C. G., A statistical evaluation of several graphical methods for representing multivariate data, ((1983), Baylor Univ: Baylor Univ Waco, TX, U.S.A), Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation
[10] Turner, D. W.; Tidmore, F. E., Clustering with Chernoff-type faces, (Proc. Statistical Computing Section, American Statistical Association (1977)), 372-377
[11] Andrews, D. F., Plots of high dimensional data, Biometrics, 28, 125-136 (1972)
[12] Mezzich, J. E.; Worthington, D. R.L., A comparison of graphical representations of multidimensional psychiatric diagnostic data, (Wang, P. C.C., Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data (1978), Academic Press: Academic Press New York)
[13] Rand, W. M., Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods, J. Am. statist. Ass., 66, 846-850 (1971)
[14] Morey, L. C.; Agresti, A., The measurement of classification agreement: An adjustment to the Rand statistic for chance agreement, Classif. Soc. Bull., 5, 9-10 (1981)
[15] Fowlkes, E. B.; Mallows, C. L., A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings, J. Am. statist. Ass., 78, 553-569 (1983) · Zbl 0545.62042
[16] (Dixon, W. J., BMDP: Statistical Software (1981), Univ. of California Press: Univ. of California Press Berkeley, Calif)
[17] Romesburg, C. H.; Marshall, K., CLUSTAR and CLUSTID: Computer programs for hierarchical cluster analysis, Am. Statist., 34, 186 (1980)
[18] Tidmore, F. E.; Turner, D. W., On clustering with Chernoff-type faces, Commun. Statist., A12, 381-396 (1983) · Zbl 0511.62075
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.