×

Source identification for mobile devices, based on wavelet transforms combined with sensor imperfections. (English) Zbl 1305.65099

Summary: One of the most relevant applications of digital image forensics is to accurately identify the device used for taking a given set of images, a problem called source identification. This paper studies recent developments in the field and proposes the mixture of two techniques (Sensor Imperfections and Wavelet Transforms) to get better source identification of images generated with mobile devices. Our results show that Sensor Imperfections and Wavelet Transforms can jointly serve as good forensic features to help trace the source camera of images produced by mobile phones. Furthermore, the model proposed here can also determine with high precision both the brand and model of the device.

MSC:

65D18 Numerical aspects of computer graphics, image analysis, and computational geometry
65T60 Numerical methods for wavelets
94A08 Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory

Software:

LIBSVM

References:

[1] Bayram S, Sencar HT, Memon N (2008) Classification of digital camera-models based on demosaicing artifacts. Digit Investig 5(1-2):49-59 · doi:10.1016/j.diin.2008.06.004
[2] Boutell M, Luo, J (2004) Photo classification by integrating image content and camera metadata. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on pattern recognition, vol 4. IEEE Computer Society, pp 901-904. doi: 10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333918
[3] Boutell M, Luo J (2005) Beyond pixels: exploiting camera metadata for photo classification. Pattern Recogn 38(6):935-946. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.013 · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.013
[4] Celiktutan O, Avcibas I, Sankur B, Ayerden NP, Capar C (2006) Source cell-phone identification. In: 2006 IEEE 14th signal processing and communications applications, pp 1-3. doi: 10.1109/SIU.2006.1659882
[5] Chang C, Lin C (2001) LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. Tech. rep. Software available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm
[6] Do MN, Vetterli M (2005) The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(12):2091-2106 · doi:10.1109/TIP.2005.859376
[7] Geradts ZJ, Bijhold J, Kieft M, Kurosawa K, Kuroki K, Saitoh N (2001) Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol 4232. Spie, pp 505-512. doi: 10.1117/12.417569
[8] Khannaa N, Mikkilinenib AK, Chiub GT, Allebacha JP, Delpa EJ (2006) Forensic classification of imaging sensor types. In: Rfc. Purdue University, USA
[9] Luka J, Fridrich J, Goljan M (2006) Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Security 1(2):205-214. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2006.873602 · doi:10.1109/TIFS.2006.873602
[10] Mckay C, Swaminathan A, Gou H, Wu M (2008) Image acquisition forensics: forensic analysis to identify imaging source. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics speech and, signal processing, pp 1657-1660. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4517945
[11] Meng FJ, Kong XW, You XG (2008) Source camera identification based on image bi-coherence and wavelet features. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual IFIP WG 11.9 international conference on digital forensics. Kyoto, Japan
[12] Ozparlak L, Avcibas I (2011) Differentiating between images using wavelet-based transforms: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Security 6(4):1418-1431 · doi:10.1109/TIFS.2011.2162830
[13] Pudil P, Novovičová J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recogn Lett 15(11):1119-1125 · doi:10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9
[14] Randen T, Husøy JH (1999) Filtering for texture classification: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(4):291-310 · doi:10.1109/34.761261
[15] Baer R (2010) Resolution limits in digital photography: the looming end of the pixel wars - OSA technical digest (CD). In: Proceedings of the imaging systems. Optical Society of America, p ITuB3
[16] Romero NL, Chornet VG, Cobos JS, Carot AS, Centellas FC, Mendez MC (2008) Recovery of descriptive information in images from digital libraries by means of EXIF metadata. Library Hi Tech 26(2):302-315. doi:10.1108/07378830810880388 · doi:10.1108/07378830810880388
[17] Tesic J (2005) Metadata practices for consumer photos. IEEE Multimed 12(3):86-92. doi:10.1109/MMUL.2005.50 · doi:10.1109/MMUL.2005.50
[18] Tsai MJ, Lai CL, Liu J (2007) Camera/mobile phone source identification for digital forensics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics speech and signal processing ICASSP 07, pp II-221-II-224
[19] Van Lanh T, Chong KS, Emmanuel S, Kankanhalli MS (2007) A survey on digital camera image forensic methods. IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo 2007:16-19. doi:10.1109/ICME.2007.4284575 · doi:10.1109/ICME.2007.4284575
[20] Wang B, Guo Y, Kong X, Meng F (2009) Source camera identification forensics based on wavelet features. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing, vol 0. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 702-705
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.