×

Equal, proportional, and mixed sharing of cooperative production under the threat of sabotage. (English) Zbl 1402.91230

Summary: This paper analyzes the consequences of a parametrized class of sharing rules on the propensity of individuals to sabotage each other in a cooperative production framework. The considered sharing rules include equal and proportional sharing as special cases and are parametrized with respect to their sensitivity to relative input contributions. This parameter affects the equilibrium provision of productive individual labor (that increases the respective individual input contribution) but also the propensity to sabotage others (which decreases the input contributions of sabotaged individuals). The theoretical analysis shows that sharing rules in which more weight is put on equal sharing induce zero sabotage in equilibrium; however, they might also lead to inefficient underproduction. In contrast, sharing rules that are highly sensitive with respect to relative input contributions lead to destructive sabotage activities and moreover to inefficient overproduction.

MSC:

91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm
90B30 Production models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acemoglu, D; Robinson, JA, Why did the west extend the franchise? democracy, inequality and growth in historical perspective, Q J Econ, 115, 1167-1199, (2000) · Zbl 0973.91077 · doi:10.1162/003355300555042
[2] Amegashie, A; Runkel, M, Sabotaging potential rivals, Soc Choice Welf, 28, 1343-1362, (2007) · Zbl 1134.91328
[3] Beviá C, Corchón LC (2006) Rational sabotage in cooperative production with heterogenous agents. B.E. J Theor Econ (Topics) 6, Article 16
[4] Beviá, C; Corchón, LC, Cooperative production and efficiency, Math Soc Sci, 67, 143-154, (2009) · Zbl 1158.91422 · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.09.006
[5] Box S (2010) Performance-based funding for public research in tertiary education institutions: Country experiences. In: OECD, Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264094611-6-en
[6] Chen, K-P, Sabotage in promotion tournaments, J Law Econ Organ, 19, 119-140, (2003) · doi:10.1093/jleo/19.1.119
[7] Clark, DJ; Riis, C, Contest success functions: an extension, Econ Theory, 11, 201-204, (1998) · Zbl 0901.90186 · doi:10.1007/s001990050184
[8] Corchon, L, The theory of contests: a survey, Rev Econ Des, 11, 69-100, (2007) · Zbl 1274.91345
[9] Fabella, RV, Natural team sharing and productivity, Econ Lett, 27, 105-110, (1988) · Zbl 1328.90039 · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(88)90080-8
[10] Gürtler, O, On sabotage in collective tournaments, J Math Econ, 44, 383-393, (2008) · Zbl 1133.91304 · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.07.004
[11] Gunnthorsdottir, A; Rapoport, A, Embedding social dilemmas in intergroup competition reduces free-riding, Org Behav Hum Decis Process, 101, 184-199, (2006) · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.005
[12] Harbring, C; Irlenbusch, B; Kräkel, M; Selten, R, Sabotage in corporate contests - an experimental analysis, Int J Econ Bus, 14, 367-392, (2007) · doi:10.1080/13571510701597445
[13] Holmstrom, B, Moral hazard in teams, Bell J Econ, 10, 74-91, (1982) · doi:10.2307/3003320
[14] Israelsen, LD, Collectives, communes, and incentives, J Comp Econ, 4, 99-124, (1980) · doi:10.1016/0147-5967(80)90024-4
[15] Konrad, KA, Sabotage in rent-seeking contests, J Law Econ Org, 16, 155-165, (2000) · doi:10.1093/jleo/16.1.155
[16] Konrad KA (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests. Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1182.91004
[17] Kräkel, M, Helping and sabotaging in tournaments, Int Game Theory Rev, 7, 211-228, (2005) · Zbl 1102.91015 · doi:10.1142/S0219198905000491
[18] Lazear, E, Pay equality and industrial politics, J Polit Econ, 97, 561-580, (1989) · doi:10.1086/261616
[19] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1256.91002
[20] Münster, J, Selection tournaments, sabotage, and participation, J Econ Manag Strateg, 16, 943-970, (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00163.x
[21] Nitzan, S, Collective rent dissipation, Economic Journal, 101, 1522-1534, (1991) · doi:10.2307/2234901
[22] Prendergast, C, The provision of incentives in firms, J Econ Lit, 37, 7-63, (1999) · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7
[23] Sen, A, Labour allocation in a cooperative enterprise, Rev Econ Stud, 33, 361-371, (1966) · doi:10.2307/2974432
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.