The optimal pace of product updates. (English) Zbl 1157.90386
Summary: Some firms (e.g. Intel and Medtronics) use a time-pacing strategy for product development (PD), introducing new generations at regular intervals. If the firm adopts a fast pace (introducing frequently), it prematurely cannibalizes its old generation, incurring high development costs, while if it has a slow pace, it fails to capitalize on customer willingness-to-pay for improved technology. We develop a model to gain insight into which factors drive the pace. We consider PD cost, the diffusion rate (coefficients of innovation and imitation), the rate of margin decline, and the degree to which a new generation stimulates market growth. We find that a faster pace is generally associated with faster diffusion, a higher market growth rate and faster margin decay. Not so intuitively, we find that relatively minor differences in the development cost function can significantly impact the pace.
MSC:
| 90B30 | Production models |
Keywords:
OR in research and development; new product introduction; diffusion; time-pacing; clockspeedSoftware:
MatlabReferences:
| [1] | Abernathy, W.; Utterback, J., Patterns of industrial innovation, Technology Review, 80, 7, 40-47 (1978) |
| [2] | Bass, F., A new product growth model for consumer durables, Management Science, 15, 5, 215-227 (1969) · Zbl 1231.91323 |
| [3] | Bayus, B. L., Speed-to-market and new product performance trade-offs, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 6, 485-497 (1997) |
| [4] | Bayus, B. L.; Jain, S.; Rao, A. G., Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 1, 50-63 (1997) |
| [5] | Bhaskaran, S., Ramachandran, K., 2006. Technological evolution and launch timing: An analysis of the time-quality trade-off under competition. Working Paper. McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin.; Bhaskaran, S., Ramachandran, K., 2006. Technological evolution and launch timing: An analysis of the time-quality trade-off under competition. Working Paper. McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin. |
| [6] | Bhattacharya, S.; Krishnan, V.; Mahajan, V., Operationalizing technology improvements in product development decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 149, 1, 102-130 (2003) · Zbl 1037.91536 |
| [7] | Blackburn, J.; Guide, V. D.; Souza, G. C.; Van Wassenhove, L., Reverse supply chains for commercial returns, California Management Review, 46, 2, 6-22 (2004) |
| [8] | Boehm, B. W., Software Engineering Economics (1981), Prentice Hall: Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ · Zbl 0525.90034 |
| [9] | Carrillo, J., Industry clockspeed and the pace of new product development, Production and Operations Management, 14, 2, 125-141 (2005) |
| [10] | Chen, M.; Yu, C., The optimal launch schedule for two new cannibalistic durables: A diffusion theory approach, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 19, 1, 1-15 (2002) · Zbl 1165.91378 |
| [11] | Christensen, C.M., 1997. We’ve got rhythm! Medtronic corporation’s cardiac pacemaker business. Harvard Business School Case 9-697-004. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.; Christensen, C.M., 1997. We’ve got rhythm! Medtronic corporation’s cardiac pacemaker business. Harvard Business School Case 9-697-004. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA. |
| [12] | Cohen, M.; Eliashberg, J.; Ho, T., New product development: The performance and time-to-market trade-off, Management Science, 42, 2, 173-186 (1996) · Zbl 0881.90081 |
| [13] | Dataquest, Inc., 2003. A unit of Gartner, Inc.; Dataquest, Inc., 2003. A unit of Gartner, Inc. |
| [14] | Dhebar, A., Durable-goods monopolists, rational consumers, and improving products, Marketing Science, 13, 1, 100-120 (1994) |
| [15] | Dhebar, A., Speeding high-tech producer, meet the balking consumer, Sloan Management Review, 37, 2, 37-49 (1996) |
| [16] | Downs, B.; Metters, R.; Semple, J., Managing inventory with multiple products, lags in delivers, resource constraints, and lost sales, Management Science, 47, 3, 464-479 (2001) · Zbl 1232.90041 |
| [17] | Eisenhardt, K. M.; Brown, S. L., Time pacing: Competing in markets that won’t stand still, Harvard Business Review, 76, 2, 59-69 (1998) |
| [18] | Fine, C., Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (1998), Perseus Books: Perseus Books Reading, MA |
| [19] | Graves, S. B., The time-cost trade-off in research and development: A review, Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 16, 1, 1-9 (1989) |
| [20] | Hendricks, F. B.; Singhal, V. R., Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market, Management Science, 43, 4, 422-436 (1997) · Zbl 0900.90372 |
| [21] | Intel, Inc., 2007. Web site: <http://www.intel.com/>; Intel, Inc., 2007. Web site: <http://www.intel.com/> |
| [22] | Kamien, M.; Schwartz, N., Timing of innovation under rivalry, Econometrica, 40, 1, 43-60 (1972) · Zbl 0258.90005 |
| [23] | Klastorin, T.; Tsai, W., New product introduction: Timing, design and pricing, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 6, 4, 302-320 (2004) |
| [24] | Krankel, R. M.; Duenyas, I.; Kupuscinski, R., Timing successive product introductions with demand diffusion and stochastic technology improvement, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 8, 2, 119-135 (2006) |
| [25] | Krishnan, T.; Bass, F.; Jain, D., Optimal pricing strategy for new products, Management Science, 45, 12, 1650-1663 (1999) · Zbl 1231.90251 |
| [26] | Mahajan, V.; Muller, E.; Bass, F., New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research, Journal of Marketing, 54, 1, 1-26 (1990) |
| [27] | Mallik, S.; Chhajed, D., Optimal temporal product introduction strategies under valuation changes and learning, European Journal of Operational Research, 172, 2, 430-452 (2006) · Zbl 1120.90319 |
| [28] | MATLAB, 1996. MATLAB Reference Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.; MATLAB, 1996. MATLAB Reference Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA. |
| [29] | Mendelson, H.; Pillai, R. R., Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1, 1, 1-20 (1999) |
| [30] | Moorthy, K.; Png, I., Market segmentation, cannibalization and the timing of product introductions, Management Science, 38, 3, 345-359 (1992) · Zbl 0825.90636 |
| [31] | Morgan, L.; Morgan, R.; Moore, W., Quality and time-to-market trade-offs when there are multiple product generations, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 3, 2, 89-104 (2001) |
| [32] | Norton, J.; Bass, F., A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products, Management Science, 33, 9, 1069-1086 (1987) |
| [33] | Norton, J.; Bass, F., Evolution of technological generations: The law of capture, Sloan Management Review, 33, 2, 66-77 (1992) |
| [34] | Patterson, A., Shining a bright light on returns inventory: Increasing recovery through proactive disposition of returns inventory, Reverse Logistics Magazine, 1, 3, 40-43 (2006) |
| [35] | Savin, S.; Terweisch, C., Optimal product launch times in a duopoly: Balancing life-cycle revenues with product cost, Operations Research, 53, 1, 26-47 (2005) · Zbl 1165.90521 |
| [36] | Schmidt, G. M.; Druehl, C. T., Changes in product attributes and costs as drivers of new product diffusion and substitution, Production and Operations Management, 14, 3, 272-285 (2005) |
| [37] | Smith, P.; Reinertsen, D., Developing Products in Half the Time (1991), Van Nostrand Reinhold: Van Nostrand Reinhold New York |
| [38] | Souza, G. C., Product introduction decisions in a duopoly, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 3, 745-757 (2004) · Zbl 1043.91038 |
| [39] | Souza, G. C.; Bayus, B.; Wagner, H., New-product strategy and industry clockspeed, Management Science, 50, 4, 537-549 (2004) |
| [40] | Sultan, F.; Farley, J. U.; Lehmann, D. R., A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 1, 70-77 (1990) |
| [41] | Ulrich, K. T.; Eppinger, S. D., Product Design and Development (2004), Irwin McGraw-Hill |
| [42] | Wagner, H., Global sensitivity analysis, Operations Research, 43, 6, 948-969 (1995) · Zbl 0852.90122 |
| [43] | Wheelwright, S. C.; Clark, K. B., Creating project plans to focus product development, Harvard Business Review, 70, 2, 70-82 (2003) |
| [44] | Williams, J. R., How sustainable is your competitive advantage?, California Management Review, 34, 3, 29-51 (1992) |
| [45] | Wilson, L.; Norton, J., Optimal entry timing for a product line extension, Marketing Science, 8, 1, 1-17 (1989) |
| [46] | Yelle, L., The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey, Decision Sciences, 10, 2, 302-328 (1979) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
