×

Assessing uncertainty in a multispecies age-structured assessment framework: the effects of data limitations and model assumptions. (English) Zbl 1542.92135

Summary: Performance of a multispecies age-structured assessment (MSASA) model in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) relative to changes in data and model assumptions was examined through simulation exercises. Species included arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis), and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Age-specific predation mortality was estimated as a flexible function of predator and prey abundances and fitted to diet data. Simulated data sets were constructed by applying random error to estimates of catch, survey, and diet data from an operating model, whose structure was identical to that of the estimating model. Simulations explored the effects of data variability, mismatched assumptions regarding model structure, and lack of diet data on model performance. Model misspecification and uninformative diet data had the greatest influence on model performance. Given the current emphasis on the development of ecosystem-based models and management, prioritizing the rigorous sampling of diet data would best facilitate the development of predation models useful to management agencies.
{Copyright © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.}

MSC:

92D25 Population dynamics (general)

Software:

R; ADMB; AD Model Builder
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] K.H.Andersen and J.E.Beyer [2006], Asymptotic Size Determines Species Abundance in the Marine Size Spectrum, Am. Nat.168, 54-61.
[2] K.Y.Aydin, S.K.Gaichas, I.Ortiz, D.Kinzey, and N.Friday [2007], A Comparison of the Bering Sea, Gulf of Alaska, and Aleutian Islands Large Marine Ecosystems through Food Web Modeling, NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS‐AFSC‐130.
[3] N.J.Bax [1998], The Significance and Prediction of Predation in Marine Fisheries, ICES J. Mar. Sci.62, 997-1030.
[4] S.X.Cadrin and M.Dickey‐Collas [2015], Stock Assessment Methods for Sustainable Fisheries, ICES J. Mar. Sci.72, 1-6.
[5] Center for Independent Experts (CIE) [2012], Center for Independent Experts Independent Peer Review of the Gulf of Alaska Walleye Pollock Assessment. Reviews available at http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/REFM/stocks/Plan_Team/draft_assessments.htm.
[6] W.G.Clark [1999], Effects of an Erroneous Natural Mortality Rate on a Simple Age‐Structured Stock Assessment, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.56, 1721-1731.
[7] J.S.Collie and H.Gislason [2001], Biological Reference Points for Fish Stocks in a Multispecies Context, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.58, 2233-2246.
[8] P.Crone, M.Maunder, J.Valero, J.McDaniel, and B.Semmes [2013], Selectivity: Theory, Estimation, and Application in Fishery Stock Assessment Models. Center for the Advancement of Population Assessment Methodology (CAPAM) Workshop Series Report (1).
[9] K.L.Curti, J.S.Collie, C.M.Legault, and J.S.Link [2013], Evaluating the Performance of a Multispecies Statistical Proportions‐at‐Age Model, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.70, 470-484.
[10] J.J.Deroba and A.M.Schueller [2013], Performance of Stock Assessment with Misspecified Age‐ and Time‐Varying Natural Mortality, Fish. Res.146, 27-40.
[11] J.J.Deroba, D.S.Butterworth, R.D.MethotJr., J.A.A.DeOliveira, C.Fernandez, A.Nielsen, S.X.Cadrin, et al. [2015], Simulation Testing the Robustness of Stock Assessment Models to Error: Some Results from the ICES Strategic Initiative on Stock Assessment Methods, ICES J. Mar. Sci.72, 19-30.
[12] D.A.Fournier, H.J.Skaug, J.Ancheta, J.Ianelli, A.Magnusson, M.N.Maunder, A.Nielsen, and J.Sibert [2011], AD Model Builder: Using Automatic Differentiation for Statistical Inference of Highly Parameterized Complex Nonlinear Models, Taylor and Francis Online.
[13] R.I.C.C.Francis [2011], Data Weighting in Statistical Fisheries Stock Assessment Models, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.68(6), 1124-1138.
[14] S.K.Gaichas, K.Y.Aydin, and R.C.Francis [2010], Using Food Web Model Results to Inform Stock Assessment Estimates of Mortality and Production for Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.67, 1490-1506.
[15] L.P.Garrison, J.S.Link, M.Cieri, P.Kilduff, A.Sharov, D.Vaughan, B.Muffley, B.Mahmoudi, and R.Latour [2010], An Expansion of the MSVPA Approach for Quantifying Predator‐Prey Interactions In Exploited Fish Communities, ICES J. Mar. Sci.67, 856-870.
[16] J.Jurado‐Molina, P.A.Livingston, and J.N.Ianelli [2005], Incorporating Predation Interactions in a Statistical Catch‐at‐Age Model for a Predator-Prey System in the Eastern Bering Sea, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.62, 1865-1873.
[17] M.N.Maunder and A.E.Punt [2013], A Review of an Integrated Analysis in Fisheries Stock Assessment, Fish. Res.142, 61-74.
[18] H.Moustahfid, W.J.Overholtz, J.S.Link, and M.C.Tyrrell [2009], The Advantage of Explicitly Incorporating Predation Mortality into Age‐Structured Stock Assessment Models: An Application for Northwest Atlantic Mackerel, ICES J. Mar. Sci.66 (3), 445-454.
[19] National Research Council [1998], Improving Fish Stock Assessments, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 177 pp.
[20] K.R.Piner, H‐HLee, M.N.Maunder, and R.D.Methot. [2011], A Simulation‐Based Method to Determine Model Misspecification: Examples Using Natural Mortality and Population Dynamics Models, Mar. Coastal Fish3(1), 336-343.
[21] A.E.Punt [2006], The FAO Precautionary Approach after Almost 10 Years: Have We Progressed towards Implementing Simulation‐Tested Feedback‐Control Management Systems for Fisheries Management?Nat. Resour. Model.19(4), 441-464. · Zbl 1157.91419
[22] T.J.QuinnII and R.B.Deriso [1999], Quantitative Fish Dynamics, Oxford, New York.
[23] R Development Core Team [2014], R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna , Austria. ISBN 3‐900051‐07‐0, URL http://www.R‐project.org/.
[24] G.G.Thompson [1994], Confounding of Gear Selectivity and the Natural Mortality Rate in Cases Where the Former is a Nonmonotone Function of Age, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci.51, 2654-2664.
[25] A.W.Trites and D.G.Calkins [2008], Diets of Mature Male and Female Steller Sea Lions (Eumatopias jubatus) Differ and Cannot be Used as Proxies for Each Other, Aquatic Mamm.34(1), 25-34.
[26] T.S.Tsou and J.S.Collie [2001], Estimating predation mortality in the Georges Bank fish community, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci.58, 908-922.
[27] M.C.Tyrell, J.S.Link, and H.Moustahfid [2011], The Importance of Including Predation in Fish Population Models: Implications for Biological Reference Points, Fish. Res.108, 1-8.
[28] K.F.VanKirk, T.J.QuinnII, and J.S.Collie [2010], A Multispecies Age‐Structured Assessment Model for the Gulf of Alaska, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci.67, 1135-1148.
[29] K.F.VanKirk, T.J.QuinnII, J.S.Collie, and Z.T.A’mar [2012], Multispecies Age‐Structured Assessment for Groundfish and Sea Lions in Alaska, in (G.H.Kruse (ed.), H.I.Browman (ed.), K.L.Cochrane (ed.), D.Evans (ed.), G.S.Jamieson (ed.), P.A.Livingston (ed.), D.Woodby (ed.), and C.I.Zhang (ed.), eds.), Global Progress in Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management, Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, pp. 147-168.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.