×

Preconditioning and convergence in the right norm. (English) Zbl 1123.65033

Summary: The convergence of numerical approximations to the solutions of differential equations is a key aspect of numerical analysis and scientific computing. Iterative solution methods for the systems of linear(ized) equations, which often result, are also underpinned by analyses of convergence. In the function space setting, it is widely appreciated that there are appropriate ways in which to assess convergence and it is well-known that different norms are not equivalent. In the finite dimensional linear algebra setting, however, all norms are equivalent and little attention is often paid to the norms used.
In this paper, we highlight this consideration in the context of preconditioning for minimum residual methods (MINRES and GMRES/GCR/ORTHOMIN) and argue that even in the linear algebra setting there is a ’right’ norm in which to consider convergence: stopping an iteration which is rapidly converging in an irrelevant or highly scaled norm at some tolerance level may still give a poor answer.

MSC:

65F35 Numerical computation of matrix norms, conditioning, scaling
65F10 Iterative numerical methods for linear systems
65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs

Software:

IFISS

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1007/s00211-003-0500-y · Zbl 1048.65029 · doi:10.1007/s00211-003-0500-y
[2] Elman H. C., Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: With Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics (2005) · Zbl 1083.76001
[3] DOI: 10.1137/0712047 · Zbl 0319.65025 · doi:10.1137/0712047
[4] DOI: 10.1137/0907058 · Zbl 0599.65018 · doi:10.1137/0907058
[5] Axelsson O., Iterative Solution Methods (1994) · Zbl 0795.65014
[6] Vinsome, P. K.W. ORTHOMIN: An iterative method for solving sparse sets of linear equations. In: Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIM. pp.149–159.
[7] DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0917816-8 · doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0917816-8
[8] DOI: 10.1137/S1064827596303624 · Zbl 0917.73069 · doi:10.1137/S1064827596303624
[9] DOI: 10.1093/imanum/7.4.449 · Zbl 0648.65076 · doi:10.1093/imanum/7.4.449
[10] DOI: 10.1017/S0962492904000212 · Zbl 1115.65034 · doi:10.1017/S0962492904000212
[11] Arioli M., Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis
[12] Greif C., Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis 22 pp 114– (2006)
[13] DOI: 10.1137/S1064827500375096 · Zbl 1036.65033 · doi:10.1137/S1064827500375096
[14] DOI: 10.1137/050646421 · Zbl 1126.76028 · doi:10.1137/050646421
[15] DOI: 10.1002/fld.1401 · Zbl 1111.76033 · doi:10.1002/fld.1401
[16] DOI: 10.1145/1236463.1236469 · Zbl 1365.65326 · doi:10.1145/1236463.1236469
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.