×

On the complexity of optimal lottery pricing and randomized mechanisms for a unit-demand buyer. (English) Zbl 07534659

Summary: We study the optimal lottery problem and the optimal mechanism design problem in the setting of a single unit-demand buyer with item values drawn from independent distributions. Optimal solutions to both problems are characterized by a linear program with exponentially many variables. For the menu size complexity of the optimal lottery problem, we present an explicit, simple instance with distributions of support size 2, and show that exponentially many lotteries are required to achieve the optimal revenue. We also show that, when distributions have support size 2 and share the same high value, the simpler scheme of item pricing can achieve the same revenue as the optimal menu of lotteries. The same holds for the case of two items with support size 2 (but not necessarily the same high value). For the computational complexity of the optimal mechanism design problem, we show that unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses (more exactly, \(\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{NP}}=\mathrm{P}^{\#\mathrm{P}})\), there is no efficient randomized algorithm to implement an optimal mechanism even when distributions have support size 3.

MSC:

91B03 Mechanism design theory
91B24 Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)
68Q17 Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.)
68W20 Randomized algorithms
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] M.-F. Balcan and A. Blum, Approximation algorithms and online mechanisms for item pricing, Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2006, pp. 29-35.
[2] M.-F. Balcan, A. Blum, and Y. Mansour, Item pricing for revenue maximization, Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2008, pp. 50-59.
[3] P. Briest, S. Chawla, R. Kleinberg, and S. M. Weinberg, Pricing lotteries, J. Econom. Theory, 156 (2015), 144-174. · Zbl 1314.91108
[4] M. Babaioff, Y. A. Gonczarowski, and N. Nisan, The menu-size complexity of revenue approximation, Proceedings of the 49th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, New York, 2017. · Zbl 1369.68227
[5] M. Babaioff, N. Immorlica, B. Lucier, and S. M. Weinberg, A simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer, J. ACM, 67 (2020), pp. 1-40. · Zbl 1493.91027
[6] P. Briest and P. Krysta, Single-minded unlimited supply pricing on sparse instances, Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, SIAM, Philadelphia, 869-877. 2006, pp. 1093-1102. · Zbl 1192.91088
[7] P. Briest, Uniform budgets and the envy-free pricing problem, Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 808-819. · Zbl 1153.91417
[8] Y. Cai and C. Daskalakis, Extreme-value theorems for optimal multidimensional pricing, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Piscataway, NJ, 2011, pp. 522-531. · Zbl 1292.91079
[9] X. Chen, I. Diakonikolas, D. Paparas, X. Sun, and M. Yannakakis, The complexity of optimal multidimensional pricing for a unit-demand buyer, Games Econom. Behav., 110 (2018), pp. 139-164. · Zbl 1400.91214
[10] S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, and R. D. Kleinberg, Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations, Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2007, pp. 243-251.
[11] S. Chawla, D. L. Malec, and B. Sivan, The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design, Games Econom. Behav., 91 (2015), pp. 297-317. · Zbl 1318.91087
[12] C. Daskalakis, A. Deckelbaum, and C. Tzamos, Mechanism design via optimal transport, Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, ACM, New York, 2013, pp. 269-286. · Zbl 1421.68060
[13] C. Daskalakis, A. Deckelbaum, and C. Tzamos, The complexity of optimal mechanism design, Proceedings of the 25th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2014, pp. 1302-1318. · Zbl 1421.68060
[14] C. Daskalakis, A. Deckelbaum, and C. Tzamos, Strong duality for a multiple-good monopolist, Econometrica, 85 (2017), pp. 735-767. · Zbl 1420.91090
[15] E. D. Demaine, M. T. Hajiaghayi, U. Feige, and M. R. Salavatipour, Combination can be hard: Approximability of the unique coverage problem, Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2006, pp. 162-171. · Zbl 1192.68316
[16] S. Dughmi, L. Han, and N. Nisan, Sampling and representation complexity of revenue maximization, Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Web and Internet Economics, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 277-291. · Zbl 1406.91171
[17] C. Daskalakis and S. M. Weinberg, Symmetries and optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2012, pp. 370-387.
[18] V. Guruswami, J. D. Hartline, A. R. Karlin, D. Kempe, C. Kenyon, and F. McSherry, On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing, Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2005, pp. 1164-1173. · Zbl 1297.91072
[19] J. D. Hartline and V. Koltun, Near-optimal pricing in near-linear time, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp. 422-431. · Zbl 1161.68877
[20] S. Hart and N. Nisan, Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2012, pp. 656-656. · Zbl 1414.91151
[21] S. Hart and N. Nisan, The menu-size complexity of auctions, Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, New York, 2013, pp. 565-566.
[22] P. Kothari, S. Singla, D. Mohan, A. Schvartzman, and S. M. Weinberg, Approximation schemes for a unit-demand buyer with independent items via symmetries, Proceedings of the IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Piscataway, NJ, 2019, pp. 220-232.
[23] X. Li and A. C.-C. Yao, On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110 (2013), pp. 11232-11237. · Zbl 1292.91086
[24] A. M. Manelli and D. R. Vincent, Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist, J. Econom. Theory, 127 (2006), pp. 1-35. · Zbl 1122.91032
[25] R. B. Myerson, Optimal auction design, Math. Oper. Res., 6 (1981), pp. 58-73. · Zbl 0496.90099
[26] G. Pavlov, Optimal Mechanism for Selling Two Goods, Technical report, UWO Department of Economics Working Papers 20103, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, 2010. · Zbl 1277.91068
[27] J. Thanassoulis, Haggling over substitutes, J. Econom. Theory, 117 (2004), pp. 217-245. · Zbl 1181.91117
[28] S. Toda, PP is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy, SIAM J. Comput., 20 (1991), pp. 865-877. · Zbl 0733.68034
[29] Z. Wang and P. Tang, Optimal mechanisms with simple menus, Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 227-240.
[30] A. C.-C. Yao, An n-to-1 bidder reduction for multi-item auctions and its applications, Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 92-109. · Zbl 1372.91051
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.