×

A variant of \(L^{\natural}\)-convexity and its application to inventory models with batch ordering. (English) Zbl 1308.90005

Summary: Previous studies show that the concept of \(L^\natural\)-convexity. is helpful in characterizing the optimal policy for some inventory models with positive leadtimes. Such examples include the lost-sales inventory model by P. Zipkin [Oper. Res. 56, No. 4, 937–944 (2008; Zbl 1167.90369)]. On the structure of lost-sales inventory models and the inventory-pricing model by Z. Pang et al. [Oper. Res. 60, No. 3, 581–587 (2012; Zbl 1260.90023)]. However, when taking batch ordering into account, \(L^\natural\)-convexity does not work anymore.
In this paper, we extend \(L^\natural\)-convexity to a more general concept termed as \(Q\)-jump-\(L^\natural\)-convexity and apply it to batch ordering inventory models including a lost-sales inventory model and an inventory-pricing model with batch ordering and positive leadtimes. By utilizing this new concept, we can partially characterize the structure of the optimal policies for both the models. Moreover, we are able to evaluate the sensitivity of the optimal decisions with respect to system states.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91B25 Asset pricing models (MSC2010)
52A40 Inequalities and extremum problems involving convexity in convex geometry
52C07 Lattices and convex bodies in \(n\) dimensions (aspects of discrete geometry)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0636 · Zbl 1181.90006 · doi:10.1287/opre.1080.0636
[2] DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.3.376.12427 · Zbl 1106.90302 · doi:10.1287/opre.48.3.376.12427
[3] DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2005.863484 · Zbl 1366.90003 · doi:10.1109/TAC.2005.863484
[4] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0127 · Zbl 1165.90308 · doi:10.1287/opre.1040.0127
[5] X. Chen and D. Simchi-Levi, The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, eds. R. Philips and O. Ozalp (Oxford University Press, UK, 2012) pp. 784–822.
[6] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1287.17315 · Zbl 1232.90042 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1287.17315
[7] DOI: 10.1287/opre.47.3.454 · Zbl 0979.90004 · doi:10.1287/opre.47.3.454
[8] DOI: 10.1287/msom.4.4.275.5730 · doi:10.1287/msom.4.4.275.5730
[9] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1238 · Zbl 1232.90045 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1238
[10] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0153 · Zbl 1165.90314 · doi:10.1287/opre.1040.0153
[11] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0462 · Zbl 1167.90332 · doi:10.1287/opre.1070.0462
[12] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1090.0716 · Zbl 1226.90012 · doi:10.1287/opre.1090.0716
[13] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1120.1060 · Zbl 1260.90015 · doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1060
[14] DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00033-9 · doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00033-9
[15] DOI: 10.1137/1.9780898718508 · Zbl 1029.90055 · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718508
[16] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1120.1052 · Zbl 1260.90023 · doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1052
[17] DOI: 10.1287/opre.37.4.565 · Zbl 0677.90025 · doi:10.1287/opre.37.4.565
[18] Topkis D. M., Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998)
[19] DOI: 10.1287/opre.13.3.424 · Zbl 0138.15901 · doi:10.1287/opre.13.3.424
[20] DOI: 10.1287/opre.2013.1238 · Zbl 1291.90027 · doi:10.1287/opre.2013.1238
[21] C. Yano and S. Gilbert, Managing Business Interfaces: Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing Perspectives, eds. A. Chakravarty and J. Eliashberg (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003) pp. 65–103.
[22] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0482 · Zbl 1167.90369 · doi:10.1287/opre.1070.0482
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.