×

Takeovers and cooperatives: governance and stability in non-corporate firms. (English) Zbl 1229.91183

Summary: If consumers wholly or partially control a firm with market power they will charge less than the profit maximizing price. Starting at the usual monopoly price, a small price reduction will have a second order effect on profits but a first order effect on consumer surplus. Despite this desirable static result, it has been argued that cooperatives are vulnerable to take-over by outsiders who will run them as for-profit businesses. This paper studies takeovers of cooperatives. We argue that there will not be excessive takeovers of cooperatives due to the Grossman-Hart problem of free riding during takeovers.

MSC:

91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bowen HR (1943) The interpretation of voting in the allocation of economic resources. Quart J Econ 58: 27–48 · doi:10.2307/1885754
[2] Corneo G (1997) Taxpayer-Consumers and public pricing. Econ Lett 57: 235–240 · Zbl 0896.90025 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00225-5
[3] Demichelis S, Ritzberger K (2006) Corporate control and the stock market. Working paper, Institute of Advanced Studies, Vienna
[4] Dow GK, Skillman G (2007) Collective choice and control rights in firms. J Public Econ Theory 9: 107–125 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00300.x
[5] Farrell J (1985) Owner-Consumers and efficiency. Econ Lett 19: 303–306 · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(85)90223-X
[6] Fershtman C, Judd KL (1987) Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly. Am Econ Rev 77: 927–940
[7] Franks J, Mayer C, Rossi S (2010) Ownership: evolution and regulation. Rev Financial Stud (in press)
[8] Gabszewicz JJ, Vial JP (1972) Oligopoly a la Cournot in a general equilibrium analysis. J Econ Theory 4: 381–400 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(72)90129-9
[9] Grossman S, Hart O (1980) Takeover bids, the free rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell J Econ 11: 42–64 · doi:10.2307/3003400
[10] Hansmann H (1996) The ownership of enterprise. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
[11] Hart O, Moore J (1996) The governance of exchanges: members’ cooperatives versus outside ownership. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 12: 53–69 · doi:10.1093/oxrep/12.4.53
[12] Kelsey D, Milne F (2006) Externalities, monopoly and the objective function of the firm. Econ Theory 29: 143–151 · Zbl 1120.91021 · doi:10.1007/s00199-005-0036-8
[13] Kelsey D, Milne F (2008) Imperfect competition and corporate governance. J Public Econ Theory 10: 1115–1141 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00399.x
[14] Refsell O (1914) The farmers’ elevator movement. J Political Econ 22:872–895, 969–991
[15] Renstrom T, Yalcin E (2003) Endogenous firm objectives. J Public Econ Theory 5: 67–94 · doi:10.1111/1467-9779.00122
[16] Roemer JE (1993) Would economic democracy decrease the amount of public bads?. Scand J Econ 95: 227–238 · Zbl 0779.90018 · doi:10.2307/3440408
[17] Savage LJ (1954) Foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York · Zbl 0055.12604
[18] Vickers J (1985) Delegation and the theory of the firm. Econ J 95(conference supplement): 138–147 · doi:10.2307/2232877
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.