×

A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. (English) Zbl 1082.91518

Summary: This paper develops a fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral multi-issue negotiation in trading environments. In particular, we are concerned with the principled negotiation approach in which agents seek to strike a fair deal for both parties, but which, nevertheless, maximises their own payoff. Thus, there are elements of both competition and cooperation in the negotiation (hence semi-competitive environments). One of the key intuitions of the approach is that there is often more than one option that can satisfy the interests of both parties. So, if the opponent cannot accept an offer then the proponent should endeavour to find an alternative that is equally acceptable to it, but more acceptable to the opponent. That is, the agent should make a trade-off. Only if such a trade-off is not possible should the agent make a concession. Against this background, our model ensures the agents reach a deal that is fair (Pareto-optimal) for both parties if such a solution exists. Moreover, this is achieved by minimising the amount of private information that is revealed. The model uses prioritised fuzzy constraints to represent trade-offs between the different possible values of the negotiation issues and to indicate how concessions should be made when they are necessary. Also by using constraints to express negotiation proposals, the model can cover the negotiation space more efficiently since each exchange covers a region rather than a single point (which is what most existing models deal with). In addition, by incorporating the notion of a reward into our negotiation model, the agents can sometimes reach agreements that would not otherwise be possible.

MSC:

91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
91A12 Cooperative games
68T20 Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.)

Software:

KQML
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bapna, R.; Goes, P.; Gupta, A., Insights and analyses of online auctions, Comm. ACM, 44, 11, 42-50 (2001)
[2] Barbuceanu, M.; Lo, W.-K., A multi-attribute utility theoretic negotiation architecture for electronic commerce, (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2000)), 239-246
[3] Cohen, S. P., Negotiating Skills for Managers (2002), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill New York
[4] Collin, P. H., Dictionary of Business (2001), Peter Collin Publishing
[5] Das, R.; Hanson, J.; Kephart, J.; Tesauro, G., Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction, (Nebel, B., Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-01), Vol. 2, Seattle, WA (2001)), 1169-1176
[6] Dubois, D.; Fargier, H.; Prade, H., Propagation and satisfaction of flexible constraints, (Yager, R.; Zadeh, L., Fuzzy Sets, Neural Networks and Soft Computing (1994), Van Nostrand Reinhold: Van Nostrand Reinhold New York), 166-187
[7] Dubois, D.; Fargier, H.; Prade, H., Possibility theory in constraint satisfaction problems: Handling priority, preference and uncertainty, Appl. Intelligence, 6, 4, 287-309 (1996) · Zbl 1028.91526
[8] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Qualitative possibility theory and its applications to constraint satisfaction and decision under uncertainty, Internat. J. Intelligent Syst., 14, 45-61 (1999) · Zbl 0942.68717
[9] Faratin, P.; Sierra, C.; Jennings, N. R., Using similarity criteria to make issue tradeoffs in automated negotiations, Artificial Intelligence, 142, 2, 205-237 (2002)
[10] Finin, T.; Fritzson, R.; McKay, D.; McEntire, R., KQML as an agent communication language, (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (1994)), 456-463
[11] Fisher, R.; Ury, W., Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement without Giving in (1981), Random House Business Books
[12] Freuder, E. C.; Wallace, R. J., Constraint-based strategies for matchmakers, (Proc. AAAI-98 Workshop on Recommender Systems, Madison, WI (1998)), 47-50
[13] Fuller, R.; Carlsson, C., Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 2, 139-153 (1996) · Zbl 0869.90078
[14] Grabisch, M., Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 3, 279-298 (1995) · Zbl 0845.90001
[15] Guttman, R. H.; Maes, P., Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce, (Noriega, P.; Sierra, C., Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce. Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1571 (1998), Springer: Springer Berlin), 70-90
[16] Guttman, R. H.; Maes, P., Cooperative vs. competitive multi-agent negotiation in retail electronic commerce, (Klusch, M.; Weiß, G., Cooperative Information Agents II. Cooperative Information Agents II, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1435 (1998), Springer: Springer Berlin), 135-147
[17] He, M.; Leung, H. F.; Jennings, N. R., A fuzzy logic based bidding strategy in continuous double auctions, IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2003), to appear
[18] Heiskanen, P.; Ehtamo, H.; Hämäläinen, R. P., Constraint proposal method for computing Pareto solutions in multi-party negotiations, European J. Oper. Res., 133, 1, 44-61 (2001) · Zbl 0989.90082
[19] Hiltrop, J. M.; Udall, S., The Essence of Negotiation (1995), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
[20] Jennings, N. R.; Faratin, P.; Lomuscio, A. R.; Parsons, S.; Sierra, C.; Wooldridge, M., Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges, Internat. J. Group Decision Negotiation, 10, 2, 199-215 (2001)
[21] Jennings, N. R.; Sycara, K.; Wooldridge, M., A roadmap of agent research and development, Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent Systems, 1, 7-38 (1998)
[22] Keeney, R.; Raiffa, H., Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0488.90001
[23] Klement, E. P.; Mesiar, R.; Pap, E., On the relationship of associative compensatory operators to triangular norms and conorms, Internat. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst., 4, 2, 129-144 (1996) · Zbl 1232.03041
[24] Klir, G. J.; Yuan, B., Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications (1995), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ · Zbl 0915.03001
[25] Kowalczyk, R., On linguistic fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems, (Zadeh, L. A.; Kacprzyk, J., Computing with Words in Intelligent Information Systems (1999), Physica-Verlag), 305-321 · Zbl 0947.68161
[26] Kowalczyk, R., On negotiation as a distributed fuzzy constraint satisfaction problem, (Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Soft Computing for Industry of the World Automation Congress (2000)), 631-637
[27] Kowalczyk, R.; Bui, V., On constraint-based reasoning in e-negotiation agents, (Dignum, F.; Cortés, U., Agent-Mediated E-Commerce III. Agent-Mediated E-Commerce III, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2003 (2000), Springer: Springer Berlin), 31-46 · Zbl 0977.68715
[28] Kraus, S., Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments (2001), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1062.68099
[29] Kraus, S.; Sycara, K.; Evenchik, A., Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence, 104, 1-2, 1-69 (1998) · Zbl 0908.68033
[30] Li, Y.-M.; Shi, Z.-K., Remarks on uninorm aggregation operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 114, 377-380 (2000) · Zbl 0962.03052
[31] X. Luo, N.R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, Acquiring tradeoff preferences for automated negotiations: A case study, Submitted for publication; X. Luo, N.R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, Acquiring tradeoff preferences for automated negotiations: A case study, Submitted for publication
[32] Luo, X.; Leung, H.-F.; Lee, J. H.-M., A new axiomatic framework for prioritized fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems, (Mizoguchi, R.; Slaney, J., Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1886 (2000), Springer: Springer Berlin), 795
[33] Luo, X.; Leung, H.-F.; Lee, J. H.-M., Theory and properties of a selfish protocol for multi-agent meeting scheduling using fuzzy constraints, (Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2000), Humboldt University: Humboldt University Berlin, Germany), 373-377
[34] Luo, X.; Leung, H.-F.; Lee, J. H.-M.; Jennings, N. R., Prioritised fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems: Axioms, instantiation and validation, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 136, 2, 151-188 (2003) · Zbl 1024.68097
[35] Luo, X.; Zhang, C.; Jennings, N. R., A hybrid model for sharing information between fuzzy, uncertain and default reasoning models in multi-agent systems, Internat. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst., 10, 4, 401-450 (2002) · Zbl 1084.68903
[36] Mackworth, A. K., Consistency in networks of relations, Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1, 99-118 (1977) · Zbl 0341.68061
[37] Maes, P.; Guttman, R. H.; Moukas, A. G., Agents that buy and sell: Shoppers and sellers alike dispatch them into the digital bazaar to autonomously represent their best interests, Comm. ACM, 42, 3, 81-91 (1999)
[38] Marichal, J.-L., On sugeno integral as an aggregation function, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 3, 347-365 (2000) · Zbl 0971.28010
[39] Matos, N.; Sierra, C., Evolutionary computing and negotiating agents, (Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1571 (1998), Springer: Springer Berlin), 126-150
[40] Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (1944), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ · Zbl 0063.05930
[41] Parsons, S., Qualitative Methods for Reasoning under Uncertainty (2001), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 0998.68178
[42] Parsons, S.; Sierra, C.; Jennings, N. R., Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, J. Logic Comput., 8, 3, 261-292 (1998) · Zbl 0904.68061
[43] Paurobally, S.; Cunningham, J., Specifying the processes and states of negotiation, (Dignum, F.; Sierra, C., Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce. Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1991 (2001), Springer: Springer Berlin), 61-77
[44] Peasall, J., The New Oxford English Dictionary (2001), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford
[45] Pruitt, D., Negotiation Behavior (1981), Academic Press: Academic Press New York
[46] Raiffa, H., The Art and Science of Negotiation (1982), Harvard University Press: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
[47] Rosenschein, J. S.; Zlotkin, G., Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers (1994), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[48] Rubinstein, A., Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica, 50, 1, 97-109 (1982) · Zbl 0474.90092
[49] Ryu, Y. U., A hierarchical constraint satisfaction approach to product selection for electronic shopping support, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part A: Systems and Humans, 29, 6, 525-532 (1999)
[50] Sandholm, T., Distributed rational decision making, (Weiss, G., Multiagent Systems (1999), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA), 201-258
[51] Sandholm, T. W., eMediator: A next generation electronic commerce server, (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2000)), 341-348
[52] Schreiber, G.; Akkermans, H.; Anjewierden, A.; Hoog, R. D.; Shadbolt, N.; van de Velde, W.; Wielinga, B., Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology (2000), MIT Press: MIT Press New York
[53] Steel, P. T.; Beasor, T., Business Negotiation: A Practical Workbook (1999), Gower Publishing Limited
[54] Sun, R.; Chu, B.; Wilhelm, R.; Yao, J., A CSP-based model for integrated supply chain, (Proceedings of AAAI-99 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce, Orlando, FL (1999)), 92-100
[55] Tsang, E. P.K., Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction (1993), Academic Press: Academic Press New York
[56] Unt, I., Negotiation without a Loser (1999), Copenhagen Business School
[57] Volkema, R. J., The Negotiation Toolkit: How to Get Exactly What You Want in Any Business or Personal Situation (1999), Amacom
[58] Walsh, W.; Wellman, M., A market protocol for decentralized task allocation, (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (1998)), 325-332
[59] Willmott, S.; Calisti, M.; Faltings, B.; Macho-Gonzales, S.; Belakdhar, O.; Torrens, M., CCL: Expressions of choice in agent communication, (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (2000)), 325-332
[60] Wooldridge, M.; Jennings, N. R., Intelligent agents: Theory and practice, Knowledge Engrg. Rev., 10, 2, 115-152 (1995)
[61] Yager, R. R., Misrepresentations and challenges: A response to Elkan, IEEE Expert, 9, 4, 41-42 (August 1994) · Zbl 1009.03531
[62] Yager, R. R.; Rybalov, A., Uninorm aggregation operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 80, 111-120 (1996) · Zbl 0871.04007
[63] Yokoo, M., Distributed Constraint Satisfaction: Foundations of Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems (2000), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 0968.68150
[64] Yokoo, M.; Durfee, E. H.; Ishida, T.; Kuwabara, K., The distributed constraint satisfaction problem: Formalization and algorithms, IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg., 10, 5, 673-685 (1998)
[65] Yokoo, M.; Hirayama, K., Distributed constraint satisfaction algorithm for complex local problems, (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (1998)), 372-379
[66] Yokoo, M.; Ishida, T., Search algorithms for agents, (Weiss, G., Multiagent Systems (1999), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA), 165-201
[67] Zadeh, L., Fuzzy sets, Inform. and Control, 8, 338-353 (1965) · Zbl 0139.24606
[68] Zadeh, L., The calculus of fuzzy restrictions, (Zadeh, L. A.; etal., Fuzzy Sets and Applications to Cognitive and Decision Making Processes (1975), Academic Press: Academic Press New York), 1-39 · Zbl 0327.02018
[69] Zeng, D.; Sycara, K., How can an agent learn to negotiate?, (Müller, J. P.; Wooldridge, M. J.; Jennings, N. R., Intelligent Agents III: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. Intelligent Agents III: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1193 (1997), Springer: Springer Berlin), 233-244
[70] Zeng, D.; Sycara, K., Bayesian learning in negotiation, Internat. J. Human-Computer Stud., 48, 1, 125-141 (1998)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.