On classifying abduction. (English) Zbl 1327.03005
Summary: We can witness the recent surge of interest in classifying different patterns or types of abduction. Many philosophers have suggested their own classifications emphasizing different aspects of abduction. Such a development is remarkable, in view of the fact that until quite recently the focus of the research on Peircean abduction was to identify its logical form. Another agenda in the recent attempts to classify abduction is whether to allow non-explanatory abductions. In order to resolve these two closely related issues, I propose to examine how Peirce would have responded to them. In particular, I suggest to do this in connection with Peirce’s another life-long project, the classification of sciences. In this examination, it will be shown that Peirce struggled with the problem of conflating induction and abduction. I shall discuss how this problem influenced both Peirce’s views on the interrelationship between abduction, deduction, and induction on the one hand, and his many classifications of sciences on the other. Also, the implication of the fundamental change in Peirce’s views of abduction, deduction, and induction to the problem of the classification of sciences will be uncovered. Finally, I shall discuss whether inference to the best explanation is abduction. Insofar as this problem has bearing on the two controversial issues in classifying abduction, my negative answer will demonstrate that classifying abduction is yet to get off the ground.
MSC:
| 03A10 | Logic in the philosophy of science |
References:
| [1] | Aliseda, A., Abductive Reasoning (2006), Springer: Springer Dordrecht · Zbl 1107.03300 |
| [2] | Anderson, D. R., The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc., 22, 2, 145-164 (1986) |
| [3] | Anderson, D. R., Creativity and the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce (1987), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Dordrecht |
| [4] | Anderson, D. R., Strands of System: The Philosophy of Charles Peirce (1995), Purdue University Press: Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana |
| [5] | Atkins, R. K., Restructuring the sciences: Peirce’s categories and his classifications of the sciences, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc., 42, 4, 483-499 (2006) |
| [6] | Barnes, E., Inference to the loveliest explanation, Synthese, 103, 251-277 (1995) |
| [7] | Ben-Menahem, Y., The inference to the best explanation, Erkenntnis, 33, 319-344 (1990) |
| [8] | Bird, A., Philosophy of Science (1998), UCL Press: UCL Press London |
| [9] | Campos, D. G., On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation, Synthese, 180, 419-442 (2011) |
| [10] | Day, T.; Kincaid, H., Putting inference to the best explanation in its place, Synthese, 98, 271-295 (1994) |
| [11] | Fann, K. T., Peirce’s Theory of Abduction (1970), Martinus Nijhoff: Martinus Nijhoff The Hague |
| [12] | Fisch, M. H., (Ketner, K. L.; Kloesel, C. J.W., Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch (1986), Indiana University Press: Indiana University Press Bloomington) |
| [13] | Friedman, H.; Simpson, H., Issues and problems in reverse mathematics, (Computability Theory and Its Applications. Computability Theory and Its Applications, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 257 (2000)), 127-144 · Zbl 0967.03050 |
| [14] | Gabbay, D.; Woods, J., The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial, A Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems, vol. 2 (2005), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam · Zbl 1078.03002 |
| [15] | Gabbay, D.; Woods, J., Logic and the law: crossing the lines of discipline, (Gabbay; etal., Approaches to Legal Rationality (2010)), 165-201 |
| [16] | Gabbay, D.; Woods, J., Relevance in the law, (Gabbay; etal., Approaches to Legal Rationality (2010)), 239-261 |
| [17] | Gabbay, D.; Woods, J., The law of evidence and labelled deduction: a position paper, (Gabbay; etal., Approaches to Legal Rationality (2010)), 295-331 |
| [18] | Gödel, K., Russell’s mathematical logic, (Schilpp, P., The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell (1944), The Tudor Publishing Company: The Tudor Publishing Company New York), 123-153 |
| [19] | Gödel, K., Remarks before the Princeton Bicentennial Conference on Problems in Mathematics, (Feferman, S.; etal., Kurt Gödel Collected Works (1990), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford), 150-153 |
| [20] | Goudge, T. A., The Thought of C. S. Peirce (1950), Dover: Dover New York |
| [21] | Harman, G., The inference to the best explanation, Philos. Rev., 74, 1, 88-95 (1965) |
| [22] | Hintikka, J., Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning (2007), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge |
| [23] | Hoffmann, M. H.G., ‘Theoric transformations’ and a new classification of abductive inferences, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc., 46, 4, 570-590 (2011) |
| [24] | Kapitan, T., Peirce and the structure of abductive inference, (Houser; etal., Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce (1997)), 477-496 |
| [25] | Kent, B., Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences (1987), McGill-Queen’s University Press: McGill-Queen’s University Press Kingston and Montreal |
| [26] | Krois, J. M., C. S. Peirce and philosophical ethics, (Parret, H., Peirce and Value Theory: On Peircean Ethics and Aesthetics (1994), John Benjamins Publishing Company: John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia), 27-37 |
| [27] | Ladyman, J., Understanding Philosophy of Science (2002), Routledge: Routledge London/New York |
| [28] | Lipton, P., Inference to the Best Explanation (1991), Routledge: Routledge London/New York |
| [29] | Lipton, P., Inference to the best explanation, (Newton-Smith, A Companion to the Philosophy of Science (2000)), 184-193 |
| [30] | Lipton, P., Inference to the Best Explanation (2004), Routledge: Routledge London/New York |
| [31] | Lipton, P., Inference to the best explanation, (Psillos; Curd, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science (2008)), 193-202 |
| [32] | Mackonis, A., Inference to the best explanation, coherence and other explanatory virtues, Synthese, 190, 6, 975-995 (2013) · Zbl 1284.03070 |
| [33] | Magnani, L., Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation (2001), Kluwer: Kluwer New York |
| [34] | Magnani, L., Morality in a Technological World: Knowledge as Duty (2007), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge |
| [35] | Magnani, L., Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning (2009), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 1191.68693 |
| [36] | Magnani, L., Understanding Violence: The Intertwining of Morality, Religion and Violence: A Philosophical Stance (2011), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin |
| [37] | Magnani, L., Is abduction ignorance-preserving? Conventions, models, and fictions in science, Special issue on Formal Representations in Model-Based Reasoning and Abduction. Special issue on Formal Representations in Model-Based Reasoning and Abduction, Log. J. IGPL, 21, 6, 882-914 (2013) · Zbl 1343.03008 |
| [38] | Magnani, L., Naturalizing logic. Errors of reasoning vindicated: logic reapproaches cognitive science, J. Appl. Log., 13, 13-36 (2015) · Zbl 1311.03021 |
| [39] | Minnameier, G., Peirce-suit of truth - why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused, Erkenntnis, 60, 75-105 (2004) · Zbl 1042.03511 |
| [40] | Park, W., Abduction and estimation in animals, Found. Sci., 17, 321-337 (2012) |
| [41] | Park, W., How to learn abduction from animals?: from Avicenna to Magnani, (Magnani, L., Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Theoretical and Cognitive Issues (2014), Springer: Springer Heidelberg/Berlin), 207-220 |
| [42] | Peirce, C. S., Collected Papers (1958), Harvard University Press: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA, (Abbreviated as CP) · Zbl 0173.00105 |
| [43] | Psillos, S., Simply the best: a case for abduction, (Kakas, A. C.; Sadri, F., Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond (2002), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin), 605-626 · Zbl 1012.03009 |
| [44] | Rappaport, S., Inference to the best explanation: is it really different from Mill’s methods?, Philos. Sci., 63, 65-80 (1996) |
| [45] | Russell, B., The regressive method of discovering the premises of mathematics [1907], (Lackey, D., Essays in Analysis (1973), George Allen and Unwin: George Allen and Unwin London), 45-66 |
| [46] | Schurz, G., Patterns of abduction, Synthese, 164, 201-234 (2008) · Zbl 1261.03064 |
| [47] | Shapiro, E., Inductive inference of theories from facts, (Lassez, J. L.; etal., Computational Logic (1991), MIT: MIT Cambridge, Mass.) |
| [48] | Simpson, S. G., Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic (1999), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 0909.03048 |
| [49] | Staat, W., On abduction, deduction, induction and the categories, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc., 29, 2, 225-237 (1993) |
| [50] | Thagard, P., The best explanation: criteria for theory choice, J. Philos., 75, 76-92 (1978) |
| [51] | Thagard, P., Computational Philosophy of Science (1988), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA |
| [52] | Thagard, P., (Review of) L. Magnani, Abductive cognition: the epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning, Mind Soc., 9, 1, 111-112 (2010) |
| [53] | Thagard, P., The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change (2012), The MIT Press: The MIT Press Cambridge, MA |
| [54] | Vogel, J., Cartesian skepticism and inference to the best explanation, J. Philos., 87, 658-666 (1990) |
| [55] | Wheeler, M., Is language an ultimate artifact?, Lang. Sci., 26, 693-715 (2004) |
| [56] | Williamson, J., Review of Lorenzo Magnani, Abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation, Br. J. Philos. Sci., 54, 353-358 (2003) |
| [57] | Woods, J., Recent developments in abductive logic, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 42, 1, 240-244 (2011), (Essay review of L. Magnani, Abductive Cognition. The Epistemologic and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin, 2009) |
| [58] | Woods, J., Abduction and proof: a criminal paradox, (Gabbay; etal., Approaches to Legal Rationality (2010)), 217-238 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
