×

Algorithms for vector field generation in mass consistent models. (English) Zbl 1194.86014

Summary: Diagnostic models in meteorology are based on the fulfillment of some time independent physical constraints as, for instance, mass conservation. A successful method to generate an adjusted wind field, based on mass conservation equation, was proposed by Sasaki and leads to the solution of an elliptic problem for the multiplier. Here we study the problem of generating an adjusted wind field from given horizontal initial velocity data, by two ways. The first one is based on orthogonal projection in Hilbert spaces and leads to the same elliptic problem but with natural boundary conditions for the multiplier. We derive from this approach the so called E-algorithm. An innovative alternative proposal is obtained from a second approach where we consider the saddle-point formulation of the problem - avoiding boundary conditions for the multiplier - and solving this problem by iterative conjugate gradient methods. This leads to an algorithm that we call the CG-algorithm, which is inspired from Glowinsk’s approach to solve Stokes-like problems in computational fluid dynamics. Finally, the introduction of new boundary conditions for the multiplier in the elliptic problem generates better adjusted fields than those obtained with the original boundary conditions.

MSC:

86A10 Meteorology and atmospheric physics
76M10 Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
35Q30 Navier-Stokes equations
65N06 Finite difference methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
35J99 Elliptic equations and elliptic systems
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Sherman, A mass-consistent model for wind fields over complex terrain, J Appl Meteor 17 pp 312– (1978)
[2] Finardi, Evaluation of a 3-D flow and pollutant dispersion modelling system to estimate climatological ground level concentrations in complex coastal sites, Int J Environ Pollution 16 pp 472– (2001) · doi:10.1504/IJEP.2001.000642
[3] Castino, Wind climate micro-zoning: a pilot application to Liguria Region (North-Western Italy), J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 91 pp 1353– (2003)
[4] Gross, On the applicability of mass-consistent wind field models, Boundary-Layer Meteorol 77 pp 379– (1996)
[5] Ratto, Mass-consistent models for wind fields over complex terrain: the state of the art, Environ Software 9 pp 247– (1994)
[6] Ratto, An overview of mass-consistent models, Modeling of atmosphere flow fields pp 379– (1996) · doi:10.1142/9789814447164_0014
[7] Seaman, Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments, Atmospher Environ 34 pp 2231– (2000)
[8] Sasaki, An objective analysis based on the variational method, J Met Soc Jpn 36 pp 77– (1958)
[9] Pennel, An evaluation of the role of numerical wind field models in wind turbine siting, Technical Report PNL-SA-11129 (1983)
[10] Kitada, Estimation of the vertical air motion from limited horizontal wind data-A numerical experiment, Atmos Environ 17 pp 2181– (1983)
[11] Kitada, Numerical Analysis of Air Pollution in a Combined Field of Land/Sea Breeze and Mountain/Valley Wind, Climite Appl Met 25 pp 767– (1986)
[12] Ross, Diagnostic wind field modeling for complex terrain: model development and testing, J Appl Meteor 27 pp 785– (1988)
[13] S. F. Burch and F. Ravenscroft, Computer modelling the UK Wind Energy Resource: Final Overview Report, Technical Report ETSU WN 7055, AEA Industrial Technology Harwell Laboratory, 1992.
[14] Conte, Numerical evaluation of the wind energy resource of Liguria, J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 74-76 pp 355– (1998)
[15] Martens, Validation of a mass consistent flow model as part of a decision support system, Int J Environ Pollut 14 pp 573– (2000) · doi:10.1504/IJEP.2000.000581
[16] Wang, Application of a multigrid method to a mass-consistent diagnostic wind model, J Appl Meteorol 44 pp 1078– (2005)
[17] G. F. Homicz, Three-Dimensional Wind Field Modeling: A Review, report SAN2002-2597, Sandia National Laboratories, 2002.
[18] M. A. Núñez, New scheme to compute mass-consistent models of geophysical flows, in ”Proceedings of the I Workshop on Asymptotics for Parabolic and Hyperbolic Systems”, Laboratóiro Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis-R. J., Brasil, 2008.
[19] M. A. Núñez, G. Ramírez, and H. Hernández, Análisis de métodos de interpolación de datos de viento basados en la ecuación de conservación de la masa, Reporte de investigación, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, 1-65, 2004.
[20] Núñez, A study of hydrodynamic mass-consistent models, J Comp Methods Sci Eng 6 pp 365– (2006) · Zbl 1210.86003
[21] Glowinski IX (2003)
[22] Girault, Finite element methods for the Navier-Stokes equations: theory and algorithms (1986) · Zbl 0585.65077 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61623-5
[23] Núñez, Interpolation of hydrodynamic velocity data with the continuity equation, J Comp Methods Sci Eng 7 pp 21– (2007) · Zbl 1388.76267
[24] Ciarlet, The finite element method for elliptic problems (1970)
[25] Press, The Art of Scientific Computing (1992)
[26] Bercovier, Error estimates for the finite element method solution of the Stokes problem in the primitive variables, Numer Math 33 pp 211– (1979) · Zbl 0423.65058
[27] GTOPO30 documentation, section 7, U. S. Geological Survey, Available at: http://www.scd.ucar.edu (1997).
[28] Raffel, Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03637-2
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.