×

Zeilinger on information and reality. (English) Zbl 1490.81005

Summary: According to Zeilinger’s information interpretation of quantum mechanics ‘the distinction between reality and our knowledge of reality, between reality and information, cannot be made. They are in a deep sense indistinguishable’. This is what we call Zeilinger’s thesis. This thesis has been criticized as a lapse into ‘informational immaterialism’ and amounting to nothing more than a tautology. However, we will argue that this criticism is based on a pre-Kantian view of reality, namely metaphysical realism which could be questioned on the basis of Putnam’s arguments. Furthermore, it will be argued that to understand Zeilinger’s thesis one should abandon the pre-Kantian perspective of metaphysical realism and adopt a post-Kantian perspective on the relationship between the mind and the world.

MSC:

81P05 General and philosophical questions in quantum theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Albert, DZ, Quantum mechanics and experience (1994), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Cambridge · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1bzfptv
[2] Bell, JS, Against ‘measurement’, Physics World, 3, 8, 33-40 (1990) · doi:10.1088/2058-7058/3/8/26
[3] Bilban, T., Realism and antirealism in informational foundations of quantum theory, Quanta, 3, 1, 32-42 (2014) · doi:10.12743/quanta.v3i1.24
[4] Bitbol, M., Reflective metaphysics: Understanding quantum mechanics from a Kantian standpoint, Philosophica, 83, 53-83 (2010)
[5] Bitbol, M.; Kerszberg, P.; Petitot, J., Constituting objectivity: Transcendental perspectives on modern physics (2009), Berlin: Springer, Berlin
[6] Bitbol, M.; Osnaghi, S.; Darrigol, O.; Duplantier, B.; Raimond, JM; Rivasseau, V., Bohr’s complementarity and Kant’s epistemology, Niels Bohr, 1913-2013: Poincaré Seminar 2013 (2016), Cham: Birkhäuser, Cham
[7] Boge, FJ, Quantum mechanics between ontology and epistemology (2018), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1496.81015 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95765-4
[8] Bohr, N., Causality and complementarity, Philosophy of Science, 4, 3, 289-298 (1937) · doi:10.1086/286465
[9] Bohr, N., On the notions of causality and complementarity, Science, 111, 2873, 51-54 (1950) · doi:10.1126/science.111.2873.51
[10] Cuffaro, M., The Kantian framework of complementarity, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 4, 309-317 (2010) · Zbl 1228.81030 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.04.003
[11] Dalla Chiara, ML; Giuntini, R.; Leporini, R.; Sergioli, G., Quantum computation and logic: How quantum computers have inspired logical investigations (2018), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1530.81002 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04471-8
[12] Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Maudlin, T., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2006). The message of the quantum? In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 844, No. 1, pp. 129-132).
[13] d’Espagnat, B., Veiled reality: An analysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts (2003), Boulde: Westview Press, Boulde · Zbl 1044.81008
[14] Einstein, A., Physics and reality, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221, 3, 349-382 (1936) · doi:10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5
[15] Friederich, S., Interpreting quantum theory: A therapeutic approach (2015), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke · doi:10.1057/9781137447159
[16] Fuchs, C. A. (2001) Notes on a Paulian idea: Foundational, historical, anecdotal and forward looking thoughts on the quantum (selected correspondence) (Växjö: Växjö University Press, 2003); arXiv: quant-ph/0105039.
[17] Fuchs, C. A. (2002). Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and only a little more). arXiv: quant-ph/0205039.
[18] Fuchs, C. A. (2010). QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. arXiv: 1003.5209.
[19] Fuchs, CA; Mermin, ND; Schack, R., An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics, American Journal of Physics, 82, 8, 749-754 (2014) · doi:10.1119/1.4874855
[20] Healey, R., Quantum theory: A pragmatist approach, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63, 4, 729-771 (2012) · Zbl 1319.81011 · doi:10.1093/bjps/axr054
[21] Healey, R., The quantum revolution in philosophy (2017), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1379.81001 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198714057.001.0001
[22] Held, C. (2018). The Kochen-Specker theorem. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/kochen-specker/.
[23] Kant, I., Critique of pure reason (1996), London: Hackett, London
[24] Kochen, S.; Specker, EP, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87 (1967) · Zbl 0156.23302
[25] Kofler, J.; Zeilinger, A., The information interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Schrödinger Cat Paradox, Sciences et Avenir Hors-Série, 148, 58 (2006)
[26] Lewis, PJ, Quantum ontology: A guide to the metaphysics of quantum mechanics (2016), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190469825.001.0001
[27] Petersen, A., The philosophy of Niels Bohr, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 19, 7, 8-14 (1963) · doi:10.1080/00963402.1963.11454520
[28] Putnam, H., Reason, truth and history (1981), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625398
[29] Putnam, H., Realism with a human face (1992), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Cambridge
[30] Putnam, H., Pragmatism: An open question (1995), Oxford: Blackwell, Oxford
[31] Russell, B., A history of western philosophy (1945), New York: Simon and Schuster, New York
[32] Saatsi, J.; Cordero, A., Scientific realism meets metaphysics of quantum mechanics, Philosophers look at quantum mechanics, 141-162 (2019), Cham: Springer, Cham · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15659-6_10
[33] Shafiee, A.; Safinejad, F.; Naqsh, F., Information and the Brukner-Zeilinger interpretation of quantum mechanics: A critical investigation, Foundations of Physics Letters, 19, 1, 1-20 (2006) · Zbl 1099.81021 · doi:10.1007/s10702-006-1845-0
[34] Timpson, CG; Bokulich, A.; Jaeger, G., Information, immaterialism, instrumentalism: Old and new in quantum information, Philosophy of quantum information and entanglement, 208-227 (2010), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1216.81018 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511676550.012
[35] Timpson, CG, Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics (2013), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1276.81002 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296460.001.0001
[36] van Fraassen, BC, Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view (1991), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford · doi:10.1093/0198239807.001.0001
[37] van Fraassen, BC; Bitbol, M.; Kerszberg, P.; Petitot, J., Can empiricism leave its realism bedind? Toward a dialogue with transcendentalists, Constituting objectivity: Transcendental perspectives on modern physics (2009), Berlin: Springer, Berlin · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_27
[38] Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus logico-philosophicus (2001), London: Routledge, London · JFM 48.1128.13
[39] Zeilinger, A., A foundational principle for quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics, 29, 4, 631-643 (1999) · doi:10.1023/A:1018820410908
[40] Zeilinger, A., The message of the quantum, Nature, 438, 7069, 743 (2005) · doi:10.1038/438743a
[41] Zeilinger, A., Dance of the photons: From Einstein to quantum teleportation (2010), New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.