×

Control theory and the management of ecosystems: a threshold policy with hysteresis is robust. (English) Zbl 1191.92076

Summary: Control theory is much used in engineering to stabilize a given dynamical system at a desired equilibrium point or to confine its trajectories to a region. Extinction of species is one of the most serious problems facing fishery and, to avoid it, different policies are applied. The threshold policy (TP) is a harvesting strategy commonly used in fisheries all over the world, and also is a special and simple case of the variable structure control (VSC). In this paper, the concept of virtual equilibrium points is used to design three different kinds of threshold policies; the standard one (TP), one with delay (TPD) and finally with hysteresis and delay (TPHD), for logistic models subject to Euler as well as two different nonstandard discretization schemes. Uncertainties in the intrinsic growth rate, in the carrying capacity, in the population density, and in the effort policy as well as an overexploitation situation are considered. A time lag in the control policies is also introduced. The important novel characteristic of the TPD and TPHD is that both ensure that, even though the system is subjected to uncertainties and a period of overexploitation, the system eventually stabilizes in bounded oscillations in a desired safe region of the state space. In addition, the sustainable yield under the proposed policies is compared with that of the proportional policy proposed by C. Loehle [J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 957–966 (2006)], in order to discuss economic aspects of the proposed threshold policies.

MSC:

92D40 Ecology
91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
93C95 Application models in control theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Loehle, C., Control theory and the management of ecosystems, J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 957-966 (2006)
[2] Hjerne, O.; Hansson, S., Constant catch or constant harvest rate? The Baltic Sea cod (Gadus morhua L.) fishery as a modelling example, Fisheries Res., 53, 1, 57-70 (2001)
[3] Kaitala, V.; Jonzén, N.; Enberg, K., Harvesting strategies in a fish stock dominated by low-frequency variability: the Nowegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus), Mar. Resourc. Econ., 18, 263-274 (2003)
[5] Quinn, T. J.; Deriso, R. B., Quantitative Fish Dynamics, Biological Resource Management Series (2000), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford
[6] Jonzén, N.; Ranta, E.; Lunberg, P.; Kaitala, V.; Linden, H., Harvesting induced fluctuations?, Wildlife Biol., 9, 59-65 (2003)
[7] Noy-Meir, I., Stability of grazing systems: an application of predator-prey graphs, J. Ecol., 63, 2, 459-481 (1975)
[8] Van Nes, E. H.; Scheffer, M.; Van den Berg, M. S.; Coops, H., Aquatic macrophytes: restore, eradicate or is there a compromise?, Aquatic Bot., 72, 3-4, 387-403 (2002)
[9] Clark, C. W., Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources (1976), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons USA · Zbl 0364.90002
[10] Clark, C. W., Bioeconomics Modelling and Fisheries Management (1985), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons USA
[11] Kot, M., Elements of Mathematical Ecology (2001), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[12] Mickens, R. E., Nonstandard Finite Difference Models of Differential Equations (1994), World Scientific: World Scientific Singapore · Zbl 0925.70016
[13] Murray, J. D., Mathematical Biology I. An Introduction (2002), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag New York · Zbl 1006.92001
[14] Mickens, R. E., A nonstandard finite-difference scheme for the Lotka-Volterra system, Appl. Numer. Math., 45, 309-314 (2003) · Zbl 1025.65047
[16] Roughgarden, J.; Smith, F., Why fisheries collapse and what to do about it, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 5078-5083 (1996)
[17] Goh, B.-S., Management and analysis of biological populations, Developments in Agricultural and Managed-Forest Ecology, vol. 8 (1980), Elsevier
[18] Meza, M. E.M.; Bhaya, A.; Kaszkurewicz, E.; Costa, M. I.S., Threshold policies control for predator-prey systems using a control Liapunov function approach, Theor. Population Biol., 67, 4, 273-284 (2005) · Zbl 1072.92054
[19] Meza, M. E.M.; Bhaya, A.; Kaszkurewicz, E., Controller design techniques for the Lotka-Volterra nonlinear system, Revista Controle Automaçao, 16, 124-135 (2005), Available from:
[20] Meza, M. E.M.; Bhaya, A.; Kaszkurewicz, E., Stabilizing control of ratio-dependent predator-prey models, Nonlinear Anal.: Real World Appl., 7, 4, 619-633 (2006) · Zbl 1102.92058
[21] Utkin, V. I., Sliding Modes in Control and Optimization (1992), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 0748.93044
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.