×

On the double critical-state model for type-II superconductivity in 3D. (English) Zbl 1187.82145

In this paper, the author analyzes an evolution variational inequality to being a formulation of the double critical-state model for type-II superconductivity proposed by Clem and Perez-Gonzalez who developed the general critical-state theory by postulating that the electric field should be decomposed into two parts. One of them corresponds to the perpendicular component of the electric current density to the magnetic flux density and the other corresponds to the parallel component.
In this paper, this double critical state model is modified by adding the term with the resistivity which vanishes if the magnitude of the current density is smaller than a certain critical value. This additional term makes the energy density deriving the corresponding constitutive relation coercive with respect to current so that a solution to the variational inequality formulation of the problem exists and the convex optimization problem is derived as the fully discrete formulation admits the existence of its unique minimizer. In order to investigate the macroscopic behavior of the electromagnetic fields around a bulk type-II superconductor in general 3D configurations, it is necessary to formulate the double critical-static model in a 3D configuration and propose a finite-element method to carry out its numerical simulations.
The author shows solvability of the problem by applying the Schauder fixed point theorem coupled with the unique existence theorem for nonlinear evolution system driven by time dependent subdifferentials. It is given the characterization theorem of a subdifferential for a class of energy functionals including the energy deriving the author’s formulation and it is observed that Faraday’s law and the nonlinear Ohm’s law can be recovered in the superconductor in the sense of almost everywhere. The space discretization is carried out by means of the lowest order edge finite element on a tetrahedral mesh. In the time discretization, it is employed a semi-implicit time-stepping scheme so the fully discrete formulation is an unconstrained minimization problem. In order to handle the curl-free constraint imposed on the magnetic field outside the superconductor, it is introduced a scalar magnetic potential and proposed the magnetic fields-scalar potential hybrid formulation, which is equivalent to the original formulation.
Finally, it is solved the discrete optimization problem in the hybrid space numerically by means of Newton’s method coupled with the conjugate gradient method. The numerical results are obtained under a rotating applied magnetic field.

MSC:

82D55 Statistical mechanics of superconductors
65M60 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
65M12 Stability and convergence of numerical methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
47J20 Variational and other types of inequalities involving nonlinear operators (general)
49J40 Variational inequalities

Software:

TetGen; ALBERTA

References:

[1] H. Attouch, Variational Convergence for Functions and Operators. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston-London-Melbourne (1984). · Zbl 0561.49012
[2] H. Attouch and A. Damlamian, Application des méthodes de convexité et monotonie à l’étude de certaines équations quasi-linéaires. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh79A (1977) 107-129. · Zbl 0374.35022
[3] A. Badía and C. López, Critical state theory for nonparallel flux line lattices in type-II superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001) 127004.
[4] A. Badía and C. López, Vector magnetic hysteresis of hard superconductors. Phys. Rev. B65 (2002) 104514.
[5] A. Badía and C. López, The critical state in type-II superconductors with cross-flow effects. J. Low. Temp. Phys. 130 (2003) 129-153.
[6] J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, Dual formulations in critical state problems. Interfaces Free Boundaries8 (2006) 349-370. Zbl1108.35098 · Zbl 1108.35098 · doi:10.4171/IFB/147
[7] C.P. Bean, Magnetization of high-field superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys.36 (1964) 31-39.
[8] A. Bermúdez, R. Rodríguez and P. Salgado, A finite element method with Lagrange multipliers for low-frequency harmonic Maxwell equations. SIAM J. Num. Anal.40 (2002) 1823-1849. Zbl1033.78009 · Zbl 1033.78009 · doi:10.1137/S0036142901390780
[9] A. Bossavit, Numerical modelling of superconductors in three dimensions: a model and a finite element method. IEEE Trans. Magn.30 (1994) 3363-3366.
[10] H. Brezis, Monotonicity methods in Hilbert spaces and some applications to nonlinear partial differential equations, in Contributions to Nonlinear Functional Analysis, E. Zarantonello Ed., Academic Press, Madison, WI (1971) 101-156. Zbl0278.47033 · Zbl 0278.47033
[11] S.J. Chapman, A hierarchy of models for type-II superconductors. SIAM Rev.42 (2000) 555-598. Zbl0967.82014 · Zbl 0967.82014 · doi:10.1137/S0036144599371913
[12] J.R. Clem and A. Perez-Gonzalez, Flux-line-cutting and flux-pinning losses in type-II superconductors in rotating magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B30 (1984) 5041-5047.
[13] I. Ekeland and R. Temam, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1976). · Zbl 0322.90046
[14] C.M. Elliott and Y. Kashima, A finite-element analysis of critical-state models for type-II superconductivity in 3D. IMA J. Num. Anal.27 (2007) 293-331. Zbl1119.82046 · Zbl 1119.82046 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drl021
[15] C.M. Elliott, D. Kay and V. Styles, A finite element approximation of a variational formulation of Bean’s model for superconductivity. SIAM J. Num. Anal.42 (2004) 1324-1341. · Zbl 1071.82063 · doi:10.1137/S0036142902412324
[16] C.M. Elliott, D. Kay and V. Styles, Finite element analysis of a current density - electric field formulation of Bean’s model for superconductivity. IMA J. Num. Anal.25 (2005) 182-204. · Zbl 1100.78018 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drh018
[17] V. Girault and P.A. Raviart, Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations, Theory and algorithms. Springer, Berlin (1986). · Zbl 0585.65077
[18] S. Guillaume and A. Syam, On a time-dependent subdifferential evolution inclusion with a nonconvex upper-semicontinuous perturbation. E. J. Qualitative Theory Diff. Equ.11 (2005) 1-22. Zbl1093.35018 · Zbl 1093.35018
[19] Y. Kashima, Numerical analysis of macroscopic critical state models for type-II superconductivity in 3D. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (2006). · Zbl 1143.65379
[20] N. Kenmochi, Solvability of Nonlinear Evolution Equations with Time-Dependent Constraints and Applications, The Bulletin of The Faculty of Education30. Chiba University, Chiba, Japan (1981). · Zbl 0662.35054
[21] P. Monk, Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003). · Zbl 1024.78009 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508885.001.0001
[22] J.C. Nédélec, Mixed finite elements in \Bbb R 3 . Numer. Math.35 (1980) 315-341. · Zbl 0419.65069 · doi:10.1007/BF01396415
[23] A. Perez-Gonzalez and J.R. Clem, Response of type-II superconductors subjected to parallel rotating magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B31 (1985) 7048-7058.
[24] A. Perez-Gonzalez and J.R. Clem, Magnetic response of type-II superconductors subjected to large-amplitude parallel magnetic fields varying in both magnitude and direction. J. Appl. Phys.58 (1985) 4326-4335.
[25] A. Perez-Gonzalez and J.R. Clem, ac losses in type-II superconductors in parallel magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B32 (1985) 2909-2914.
[26] L. Prigozhin, On the Bean critical-state model in superconductivity. Eur. J. Appl. Math.7 (1996) 237-247. · Zbl 0873.49007
[27] L. Prigozhin, The Bean model in superconductivity: variational formulation and numerical solution. J. Comput. Phys.129 (1996) 190-200. · Zbl 0866.65081 · doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0243
[28] L. Prigozhin, Solution of thin film magnetization problems in type-II superconductivity. J. Comput. Phys.144 (1998) 180-193. · Zbl 1392.78005
[29] J. Rhyner, Magnetic properties and AC-losses of superconductors with power law current-voltage characteristics. Physica C212 (1993) 292-300.
[30] R.T. Rockafellar, Integrals which are convex functionals. Pacific J. Math.24 (1968) 525-539. · Zbl 0159.43804 · doi:10.2140/pjm.1968.24.525
[31] R.T. Rockafellar and R.J.-B. Wets, Variational analysis. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1998).
[32] R. Rossi and G. Savaré, Tightness, integral equicontinuity and compactness for evolution problems in Banach spaces. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci.5 (2003) 395-431. · Zbl 1150.46014
[33] W. Rudin, Functional analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York-Tokyo (1991). Zbl0867.46001 · Zbl 0867.46001
[34] A. Schmidt and K.G. Siebert, Design of adaptive finite element software, the finite element toolbox ALBERTA, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Engrg.42. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg (2005). · Zbl 1068.65138
[35] H. Si, TetGen: A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and Three-Dimensional Delaunay Triangular. Version 1.4.1 (http://tetgen.berlios.de), Berlin (2006).
[36] J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T;B). Ann. Math. Pure. Appl.146 (1987) 65-96. · Zbl 0629.46031 · doi:10.1007/BF01762360
[37] V. Thomée, Galerkin finite element methods for parabolic problems. Springer, Berlin (1997). · Zbl 0884.65097
[38] S. Yotsutani, Evolution equations associated with the subdifferentials. J. Math. Soc. Japan31 (1978) 623-646. · Zbl 0405.35043 · doi:10.2969/jmsj/03140623
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.