×

Work assignment to and qualification of multi-skilled human resources under knowledge depreciation and company skill level targets. (English) Zbl 1197.90269

Summary: Assigning work to human resources is an important and common task for companies with high labour intensities. It is particularly complex if the human resources have multiple skills and if their efficiencies change due to learning and depreciation of knowledge depending on the tasks they are assigned to. In this context, up to now, only little work has considered strategic targets for company skill levels. Hence, we present an optimisation model to address the problem of assigning project work to multi-skilled internal and external human resources while considering learning, depreciation of knowledge and company skill level targets. This constrained nonlinear continuous model is solved using COIN-OR’s Ipopt. We assess the computation time and the impacts of problem parameters such as the shape of the learning curve, company skill level targets, depreciation of knowledge and cost parameters. Amongst other findings, our results show that faster learning of human resources leads to more specialised individuals while at the same time the whole company’s knowledge is broadened.

MSC:

90B60 Marketing, advertising
91B32 Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.)

Software:

Ipopt; COIN-OR

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00326-3 · Zbl 0937.90052 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00326-3
[2] DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.020 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.020
[3] Arzi Y, IIE Transactions 29 pp 759– (1997)
[4] Ballou DP, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics|Part A: Systems and Humans 26 pp 203– (1996) · doi:10.1109/3468.485746
[5] DOI: 10.1007/11593577_14 · doi:10.1007/11593577_14
[6] DOI: 10.1080/00207540600665802 · Zbl 1128.90347 · doi:10.1080/00207540600665802
[7] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0687 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0687
[8] DOI: 10.1080/07408170701598124 · doi:10.1080/07408170701598124
[9] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00391-4 · Zbl 0952.90007 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00391-4
[10] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00107-2 · Zbl 1008.90516 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00107-2
[11] Chen ANK, MIS Quarterly 29 pp 279– (2005)
[12] Chu SC, Journal of the Operational Research Society 44 pp 983– (1993) · doi:10.1057/jors.1993.167
[13] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601871 · Zbl 1095.90064 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601871
[14] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.015 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.015
[15] Gutjahr WJ, Technical report,, in: Bi-objective project portfolio selection and staff assignment under uncertainty (2008)
[16] DOI: 10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z · Zbl 1151.91513 · doi:10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z
[17] Gutjahr WJ, Technical report, in: Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection (2008)
[18] Heimerl C, OR Spectrum (2009)
[19] DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00026-X · doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00026-X
[20] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90312-Y · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90312-Y
[21] Krüger D, OR Spectrum (2008)
[22] DOI: 10.1080/00207540110036696 · Zbl 1060.90679 · doi:10.1080/00207540110036696
[23] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601842 · Zbl 1095.90065 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601842
[24] DOI: 10.1109/17.865905 · doi:10.1109/17.865905
[25] DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00021-9 · doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00021-9
[26] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.029 · Zbl 1138.68367 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.029
[27] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.045 · Zbl 1110.90077 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.045
[28] DOI: 10.1080/00207540601138551 · Zbl 1128.90451 · doi:10.1080/00207540601138551
[29] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.28.10.1149 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.10.1149
[30] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.718.16027 · Zbl 1232.90256 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.718.16027
[31] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00355-X · Zbl 0916.90158 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00355-X
[32] Varian HR, Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 7. ed. (2006)
[33] DOI: 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y · Zbl 1134.90542 · doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y
[34] Wright T, Journal of Aeronautical Science 3 pp 122– (1936) · doi:10.2514/8.155
[35] DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2465-0 · doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2465-0
[36] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.067 · Zbl 1127.90383 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.067
[37] DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00026.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00026.x
[38] DOI: 10.1080/00207540500272519 · Zbl 1095.90575 · doi:10.1080/00207540500272519
[39] Zipkin PH, Foundations of Inventory Management (2000)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.