×

Response surface approach to aerodynamic optimization design of helicopter rotor blade. (English) Zbl 1108.76354

Summary: This paper describes a hovering rotor blade design through the suitable combination of flow analysis and optimization technique. It includes a parametric study concerned with the influence of design variables and different design conditions such as objective functions and constraints on the rotor performance. Navier-Stokes analysis is employed to compute the hovering rotor performance in subsonic and transonic operating conditions. Response surface method based on D-optimal 3-level factorial design and genetic algorithm are applied to obtain the optimum solution of a defined objective function including the penalty terms of constraints. The designs of the rotor airfoil geometry and the rotor tip shape are performed in subsonic and transonic conditions, and it is observed that the new rotor blades optimized by various objective functions and constraints have better aerodynamic characteristics than the baseline rotor blade. The influence of design variables and their mutual interactions on the rotor performance is also examined through the optimization process.

MSC:

76N25 Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76H05 Transonic flows
76G25 General aerodynamics and subsonic flows
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Mcveigh, Journal of the American Helicopter Society 29 (1984)
[2] , , , . Multilevel decomposition approach to integrated aerodynamic/dynamic/structural optimization of helicopter rotor blades. Presented at AHS Aeromechanics Specialists Conference, San Francisco, CA, 1994.
[3] Application of numerical optimization methods to helicopter design problems: a survey. NASA TM 86010, 1984.
[4] Bennett, Vertica 7 (1983)
[5] Preliminary structural design of composite main rotor blades for minimum weight. NASA TP 2730, 1987.
[6] . Optimum design of rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Forum of the AHS, Saint Louis, MO, 1983.
[7] . Integrated multidisciplinary optimization of rotorcraft: a plan for development. NASA TM 101617, 1989.
[8] Adelman, Journal of Aircraft 28 pp 22– (1991)
[9] . Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1995. · Zbl 1161.62392
[10] . Multi-disciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent development. AIAA Paper No. 96-0711, 1996.
[11] Ahn, Journal of Aircraft 38 pp 231– (2001)
[12] Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1989. · Zbl 0721.68056
[13] Roe, Journal of Computational Physics 43 pp 357– (1981)
[14] Sweby, Lectures in Applied Mathematics 22 (1985)
[15] Jameson, AIAA Journal 25 pp 929– (1987)
[16] . Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78-0257, 1978.
[17] . Experimental and analytical studies of a model helicopter rotor in hover. NASA TM 81232, 1980.
[18] Genetic Algorithm + Data Structures = Evolutionary Programs. Springer: New York, 1992. · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02830-8
[19] Hicks, Journal of Aircraft 15 pp 407– (1978)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.