Power efficiency of Efron’s biased coin design. (English) Zbl 1311.62177
Summary: Efron’s biased coin design aims to both balance the experiment and preserve randomness. It has been noticed that, under the homoscedastic normal model, Efron’s design is uniformly more powerful than a perfect simple randomization. However, this optimality property does not hold for heteroscedastic models. For the latter, it is shown in this work that Efron’s biased coin provides more power than a perfect simple randomization for a large enough sample size. This is proved by studying the exponential rate at which the power converges to one, under the different designs, using large deviations theory. Specifically, we prove this power efficiency property for binary and normal responses, when the variances of the two treatments are different, and the probability of heads for the biased coin is equal to or greater than \(2/3\). A numerical study indicates that the power is larger even for small-sized experiments and the improvement can reach up to 4%.
MSC:
| 62P10 | Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis |
| 62D05 | Sampling theory, sample surveys |
| 62L05 | Sequential statistical design |
| 60F10 | Large deviations |
References:
| [1] | Azriel, D.; Feigin, P. D., Adaptive designs to maximize power in clinical trials with multiple treatments, Sequential Anal., 33, 60-86 (2014) · Zbl 1319.62208 |
| [2] | Azriel, D.; Mandel, M.; Rinott, Y., Optimal allocation to maximize power of two-sample tests for binary response, Biometrika, 99, 101-113 (2012) · Zbl 1234.62132 |
| [3] | Baldi Antognini, A., A theoretical analysis of the power of biased coin designs, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 138, 1792-1798 (2008) · Zbl 1255.62225 |
| [4] | Baldi Antognini, A.; Giovagnoli, A., A new ‘biased coin design’ for the sequential allocation of two treatments, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat., 53, 651-664 (2004) · Zbl 1111.62319 |
| [5] | Baldi Antognini, A.; Zagoraiou, M., The covariate-adaptive biased coin design for balancing clinical trials in the presence of prognostic factors, Biometrika, 98, 519-535 (2011) · Zbl 1231.62148 |
| [6] | Begg, C. B.; Kalish, L. A., Treatment allocation for nonlinear models in clinical trials: the logistic model, Biometrics, 40, 409-420 (1984) |
| [7] | Chen, Y. P., The power of Efron’s biased coin design, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 136, 1824-1835 (2006) · Zbl 1089.62095 |
| [8] | Efron, B., Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced, Biometrika, 58, 403-417 (1971) · Zbl 0226.62086 |
| [9] | Hu, F.; Rosenberger, W. F., The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials (2006), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 1111.62107 |
| [10] | Kalish, L. A.; Harrington, D. P., Efficiency of balanced treatment allocation for survival analysis, Biometrics, 44, 815-821 (1988) · Zbl 0715.62232 |
| [11] | Kapelner, A.; Krieger, A., Matching on-the-fly: Sequential allocation with higher power and efficiency, Biometrics, 70, 378-388 (2014) · Zbl 1419.62375 |
| [12] | Markaryan, T.; Rosenberger, W. F., Exact properties of Efron’s biased coin randomization procedure, Ann. Statist., 38, 1546-1567 (2010) · Zbl 1189.62130 |
| [13] | Silvey, S. D., Optimal Designs (1980), Chapman & Hall: Chapman & Hall London · Zbl 0468.62070 |
| [14] | Wei, L. J., The adaptive biased coin design for sequential experiments, Ann. Statist., 6, 92-100 (1978) · Zbl 0374.62075 |
| [15] | Weir, C. J.; Lees, K. R., Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial, Stat. Med., 22, 705-726 (2003) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
