×

A multiscale coupling approach between discrete element method and finite difference method for dynamic analysis. (English) Zbl 1352.74465

Summary: The coupling between two distinct numerical methods presents a major challenge, especially in the case of discrete-continuum coupling for dynamic simulations. This paper presents a general multiscale framework for coupling the discrete element method (DEM) and the finite difference method (FDM). DEM has been shown to be particular suitable for capturing physical phenomena at small length scales where continuum mechanics description no longer applies. Its efficiency, however, is limited because of the computational power required. A multidomain analysis coupling DEM and FDM is thus proposed to reduce the computational cost. To couple overlapping DEM and FDM, a bridging scale term is introduced such that compatibility of dynamic behavior between the DEM-based and the FDM-based models is enforced. This multiscale method couples two commercial packages: the DEM-based code, particle flow code, and the FDM-based code, fast lagrangian analysis of continua. The new method is applied to several reference dynamic tests. Results using the proposed method compare well with benchmark simulations from FDM and DEM.

MSC:

74S10 Finite volume methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)

Software:

PFC2D; FLAC; DEMPack
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] YuHT, YuanY, BobetA. Multiscale method for long tunnels subjected to seismic loading. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics2013; 37:374-398.
[2] MunjizaA, OwenDRJ, BicanicN. A combined finite‐discrete element method in transient dynamics of fracturing solids. Engineering Computations1995; 12:145-174. · Zbl 0822.73070
[3] RousseauJ, FranginE, MarinP, DaudevilleL. Multidomain finite and discrete elements method for impact analysis of a concrete structure. Engineering Structures2009; 31:2735-2743.
[4] Chuzel‐MarmotY, OrtizR, CombescureA. Three dimensional SPH-FEM gluing for simulation of fast impacts on concrete slabs. Computers & Structures2011; 89:2484-2494.
[5] ZhengX, WangD. Multiscale mechanical behaviors in discrete materials: a review. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica2010; 23:579-591.
[6] ChenQS, SeifriedAE, AndradeJE, BakerJW. Characterization of random fields and their impact on the mechanics of geosystems at multiple scales. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics2012; 36:140-165.
[7] AndradeJE, ChenQS, LePBH, AvilaCF, EvansMT. On the rheology of dilative granular media: bridging solid‐ and fluid‐like behavior. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids2012; 60:1122-1136.
[8] ChenQS, AndradeJE, SamaniegoE. AES for multiscale localization modeling in granular media. Computer Method in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2010; 200:2473-2483. · Zbl 1230.74221
[9] TuXX, AndradeJE, ChenQS. Return mapping for nonsmooth and multiscale elastoplasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2009; 198:2286-2296. · Zbl 1229.74147
[10] YangDM, ShengY, YeJQ, TanYQ. Dynamic simulation of crack initiation and propagation in cross‐ply laminates by DEM. Composites Science and Technology2011; 71:1410-1418.
[11] ZhaoGF, FangJN, ZhaoJ. A 3D distinct lattice spring model for elasticity and dynamic failure. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics2011; 35:859-885. · Zbl 1274.74438
[12] SaussineG, CholetC, GautierPE, DuboisF, BohatierC, MoreauJJ. Modelling ballast behaviour under dynamic loading. Part 1: a 2D polygonal discrete element method approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2006; 195:2841-2859. · Zbl 1130.74057
[13] ElmekatiA, ShamyUE. A practical co‐simulation approach for multiscale analysis of geotechnical systems. Computers and Geotechnics2010; 37:494-503.
[14] AzevedoNM, LemosJV. Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2006; 195:4579-4593. · Zbl 1123.74049
[15] ChenF, DrummEC, GuiochonG. Coupled discrete element and finite volume solution of two classical soil mechanics problems. Computers and Geotechnics2011; 38:638-647.
[16] ShafipourR, SoroushA. Fluid coupled‐DEM modelling of undrained behavior of granular media. Computers and Geotechnics2008; 35:673-685.
[17] VillardP, ChevalierB, HelloBL, CombeG. Coupling between finite and discrete element methods for the modelling of earth structures reinforced by geosynthetic. Computers and Geotechnics2009; 36:709-717.
[18] CaiM, KaiserPK, MoriokaH, MinamiM, MaejimaT, TasakaY, KuroseH. FLAC/PFC coupled numerical simulation of AE in large‐scale underground excavations. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences2007; 44:550-564.
[19] LeiZ, ZangM. An approach to combining 3D discrete and finite element methods based on penalty function method. Computational Mechanics2010; 46:609-619. · Zbl 1358.74060
[20] ZangMY, GaoW, LeiZ. A contact algorithm for 3D discrete and finite element contact problems based on penalty function method. Computational Mechanics2011; 48:541-550. · Zbl 1384.74048
[21] OñateE, RojekJ. Combination of discrete element and finite element methods for dynamic analysis of geomechanics problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2004; 19:3087-3128. · Zbl 1079.74646
[22] SaiangD. Stability analysis of the blast‐induced damage zone by continuum and coupled continuum-discontinuum methods. Engineering Geology2010; 116:1-11.
[23] Le TallecP. Domain decomposition methods in computational mechanics. Computational Mechanics Advances1994; 1:121-220. · Zbl 0802.73079
[24] AdelmanS, DollJ. Generalized Langevin equation approach for atom/solid‐surface scattering: general formulation for classical scattering off harmonic solids. The Journal of Chemical Physics1976; 64:2375.
[25] DollJ, DionD. Generalized Langevin equation approach for atom/solid‐surface scattering: numerical techniques for Gaussian generalized Langevin dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics1976; 65:3762.
[26] CelepZ, BažantZP. Spurious reflection of elastic waves due to gradually changing finite element size. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1983; 19:631-646. · Zbl 0509.73073
[27] ChamoinL, PrudhommeS, DhiaHB, OdenT. Ghost forces and spurious effects in atomic‐to‐continuum coupling methods by the Arlequin approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 83:1081-1113. · Zbl 1197.74004
[28] AbrahamFF, BroughtonJQ, BernsteinN, KaxirasE. Spanning the continuum to quantum length scales in a dynamic simulation of brittle fracture. EPL (Europhysics Letters)1998; 44:783.
[29] BroughtonJQ, AbrahamFF, BernsteinN, KaxirasE. Concurrent coupling of length scales: methodology and application. Physical Review B1999; 60:2391-2403.
[30] WagnerGJ, LiuWK. Coupling of atomistic and continuum simulations using a bridging scale decomposition. Journal of Computational Physics2003; 190:249-274. · Zbl 1169.74635
[31] ParkHS, KarpovEG, LiuWK. Non‐reflecting boundary conditions for atomistic, continuum and coupled atomistic /continuum simulations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2005; 64:237-259. · Zbl 1138.74421
[32] XiaoSP, BelytschkoT. A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2004; 193:1645-1669. · Zbl 1079.74509
[33] GuidaultPA, BelytschkoT. On the L2 and the H1 couplings for an overlapping domain decomposition method using Lagrange multipliers. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2007; 70:322-350. · Zbl 1194.74555
[34] ZhangS, KhareR, LuQ, BelytschkoT. A bridging domain and strain computation method for coupled atomistic‐continuum modeling of solids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2007; 70:913-933. · Zbl 1194.74491
[35] GuidaultPA, BelytschkoT. Bridging domain methods for coupled atomistic‐continuum models with L2 or H1 couplings. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2009; 77:1566-1592. · Zbl 1158.74309
[36] XuM, BelytschkoT. Conservation properties of the bridging domain method for coupled molecular/continuum dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 76:278-294. · Zbl 1195.74303
[37] XuM, GracieR, BelytschkoT. A continuum‐to‐atomistic bridging domain method for composite lattices. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 81:1635-1658. · Zbl 1183.74012
[38] Ben DhiaH. Multiscale mechanical problems: the Arlequin method. Comptes Rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences, Série II B1998; 326:899-904. · Zbl 0967.74076
[39] Ben DhiaH, RateauG. Analyse mathématique de la méthode Arlequin mixte. Comptes Rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences, Série I2001; 332:649-654. · Zbl 0984.65114
[40] Ben DhiaH, RateauG. Application of the Arlequin method to some structures with defects. Revue Européenne des El ément Finis2002; 11:291-304. · Zbl 1120.74858
[41] RateauG. Méthode Arlequin pour les problèmes mécaniques multi‐échelles‐applications à des problèmes de jonction et de fissuration de structures élancées. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, 2003.
[42] Ben DhiaH, RateauG. The Arlequin method as a flexible engineering design tool. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2005; 62:1442-1462. · Zbl 1084.74049
[43] BelytschkoT, LiuWK, MoranB. Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. Wiley: New York, 2000. · Zbl 0959.74001
[44] BobetA. Numerical methods in geomechanics. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering2010; 35(1B):27-48.
[45] MalvernLE. ‘Introduction,’ in Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1969.
[46] Itasca. FLAC—fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Version 4. Itasca Consulting Group Inc: Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2000.
[47] Itasca. PFC2D‐Particle Flow Code, Version 3.0. Itasca Consulting Group Inc: Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2002.
[48] CundallPA, StrackOD. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique1979; 29:47-65.
[49] JebahiM, CharlesJ, DauF, IlloulL, IordanoffI. 3D coupling approach between discrete and continuum models for dynamic simulations (DEM‐CNEM). Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2012; 255:196-209. · Zbl 1297.74119
[50] PressWH, FlanneryBP, TeukolskySA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (FORTRAN Version). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986. · Zbl 0587.65003
[51] RojekJ, OñateE. Multiscale analysis using a coupled discrete/finite element model. Interaction and Multiscale Mechanics2007; 1:1-31.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.