×

Optimal portfolio deleveraging under market impact and margin restrictions. (English) Zbl 1487.91115

Summary: We consider the problem of optimally deleveraging a high net-worth long-short portfolio in a short time period to position the fund favorably with respect to leverage and margin risks, in the face of an adverse outlook on future uncertainty. We develop a generalized mean-variance deleveraging optimization model that accounts for market impact costs in portfolio trading under market illiquidity. Due to asset price impact stemming from both volume and intensity of trading, the model has significant non-convexities. For portfolios with a large number of assets, the model is not solvable using standard software, and thus, we employ an efficient solution scheme based on dual optimization, along with a sequence of progressively-improving feasible portfolios computed under convex approximation. Our computational analysis using real data on ETF assets provides new insights on performance sensitivity. In particular, ignoring market impact severely downgrades portfolio performance depending on leverage and margin policies, as well as market liquidity conditions. Such insights can guide portfolio managers in setting deleveraging policy parameters ex-ante when faced with potential market turbulence. We also test the solution algorithm using random problem instances under thousands of assets to demonstrate the scalability and solvability of the deleveraging model.

MSC:

91G10 Portfolio theory
90C20 Quadratic programming
90C26 Nonconvex programming, global optimization

Software:

QPLIB
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Almgren, R., Optimal execution with nonlinear impact functions and trading-enhanced risk, Applied Mathematical Finance, 10, 1-18 (2003) · Zbl 1064.91058
[2] Almgren, R.; Chriss, N., Optimal execution of portfolio transactions, Journal of Risk, 3, 5-39 (2000)
[3] An, L. T.H.; Tao, P. D., A branch and bound method via d.c. optimization algorithms and ellipsoidal technique for box constrained nonconvex quadratic problems, Journal of Global Optimization, 13, 2, 171-206 (1998) · Zbl 0912.90233
[4] Ang, A.; Gorovyy, S.; Inwegen, G., Hedge fund leverage, Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 1, 102-126 (2011)
[5] Asness, C.; Frazzini, A.; Pedersen, L., Leverage aversion and risk parity, Financial Analysts Journal, 68, 1, 47-59 (2012)
[6] Bao, X.; Sahinidis, N. V.; Tawarmalani, M., Semidefinite relaxations for quadratically constrained quadratic programming: A review and comparisons, Mathematical Programming, 129, 1, 129-157 (2011) · Zbl 1232.49035
[7] Bazaraa, M. S.; Sherali, H. D.; Shetty, C. M., Nonlinear programming, theory and applications (2006), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons New York · Zbl 1140.90040
[8] Brown, D.; Carlin, B.; Lobo, M., Optimal portfolio liquidation with distress risk, Management Science, 56, 11, 1997-2014 (2010) · Zbl 1232.91610
[9] Brumm, J.; Grill, M.; Kubler, F.; Schmedders, K., Collateral requirements and asset prices, International Economic Review, 56, 1, 1-25 (2015) · Zbl 1405.91216
[10] Buchheim, C.; Wiegele, A., Semidefinite relaxations for non-convex quadratic mixed-integer programming, Mathematical Programming, 141, 1, 435-452 (2013) · Zbl 1280.90091
[11] Burer, S.; Vandenbussche, D., A finite branch-and-bound algorithm for nonconvex quadratic programming via semidefinite relaxations, Mathematical Programming, 113, 2, 259-282 (2008) · Zbl 1135.90034
[12] Burer, S.; Vandenbussche, D., Globally solving box-constrained nonconvex quadratic programs with semidefinite-based finite branch-and-bound, Computational Optimization and Applications, 43, 2, 181-195 (2009) · Zbl 1170.90522
[13] Cambini, R.; Sodini, C., Decomposition methods for solving nonconvex quadratic programs via branch and bound*, Journal of Global Optimization, 33, 3, 313-336 (2005) · Zbl 1093.90034
[14] Carlin, B.; Lobo, M.; Viswanathan, S., Episodic liquidity crises: Cooperative and predatory trading, Journal of Finance, 62, 5, 2235-2274 (2007)
[15] Chen, J.; Feng, L.; Peng, J., Optimal deleveraging with nonlinear temporary price impact, European Journal of Operational Research, 244, 240-247 (2015) · Zbl 1346.91200
[16] Chen, J.; Feng, L.; Peng, J.; Ye, Y., Analytical results and efficient algorithm for optimal deleveraging with market impact, Operations Research, 62, 1, 195-206 (2014) · Zbl 1291.90160
[17] De Angelis, P. L.; Pardalos, P. M.; Toraldo, G., Quadratic programming with box constraints, (Bomze, I. M.; Csendes, T.; Horst, R.; Pardalos, P. M. (1997), Springer US: Springer US Boston, MA), 73-93) · Zbl 0886.90130
[18] Edirisinghe, C., Chen, J., & Jeong, J. (2021). Theory of leveraged portfolio selection under liquidity risk. Under editorial review.
[19] Edirisinghe, C.; Jeong, J., Tight bounds on indefinite separable singly-constrained quadratic programs in linear-time, Mathematical Programming, 164, 193-227 (2017) · Zbl 1387.90156
[20] Edirisinghe, C.; Jeong, J., Indefinite multi-constrained separable quadratic optimization: Large-scale efficient solution, European Journal of Operational Research, 278, 49-63 (2019) · Zbl 1430.90451
[21] Furini, F.; Traversi, E.; Belotti, P.; Frangioni, A.; Gleixner, A.; Gould, N.; Mittelmann, H., Qplib: A library of quadratic programming instances, Mathematical Programming Computation, 11, 2, 237-265 (2019) · Zbl 1435.90099
[22] Gatheral, J.; Schied, A., Optimal trade execution under geometric Brownian motion in the Almgren and Chriss framework, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 14, 3, 353-368 (2012) · Zbl 1231.91403
[23] Jacobs, B.; Levy, K., Leverage aversion and portfolio optimality, Financial Analysts Journal, 68, 5, 89-94 (2012)
[24] Jacobs, B.; Levy, K., Leverage aversion, efficient frontiers, and the efficient region, Journal of Portfolio Management, 39, 3, 54-64 (2013)
[25] Jorion, P., Risk management lessons from long-term capital management, European Financial Management, 6, 3, 277-300 (2000)
[26] Linderoth, J., A simplicial branch-and-bound algorithm for solving quadratically constrained quadratic programs, Mathematical Programming, 103, 2, 251-282 (2005) · Zbl 1099.90039
[27] Lipp, T.; Boyd, S., Variations and extension of the convex-concave procedure, Optimization and Engineering, 17, 263-287 (2016) · Zbl 1364.90260
[28] Lu, C.; Deng, Z.; Zhou, J.; Guo, X., A sensitive-eigenvector based global algorithm for quadratically constrained quadratic programming, Journal of Global Optimization (2018)
[29] Pourahmadi, M.; Wang, X., Distribution of random correlation matrices: Hyperspherical parameterization of the Cholesky factor, Statistics & Probability Letters, 106, 6-12 (2015) · Zbl 1398.62133
[30] Schied, A.; Schöneborn, T.; Tehranchi, M., Optimal basket liquidation for CARA investors is deterministic, Applied Mathematical Finance, 17, 471-489 (2010) · Zbl 1206.91077
[31] Sriperumbudur, B.; Lanckriet, G., A proof of convergence of the concave-convex procedure using Zangwill’s theory, Neural computation, 24, 6, 1391-1407 (2012) · Zbl 1254.90180
[32] Xu, F.; Sun, M.; Dai, Y., An adaptive Lagrangian algorithm for optimal portfolio deleveraging with cross-impact, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 30, 5, 1-15 (2017) · Zbl 1409.91222
[33] Yuille, A.; Rangarajan, A., The concave-convex procedure, Neural Computation, 15, 4, 915-936 (2003) · Zbl 1022.68112
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.