Word play. (English) Zbl 1234.68415
Summary: This article is a perspective on some important developments in semantics and in computational linguistics over the past forty years. It reviews two lines of research that lie at opposite ends of the field: semantics and morphology. The semantic part deals with issues from the 1970s such as discourse referents, implicative verbs, presuppositions, and questions. The second part presents a brief history of the application of finite-state transducers to linguistic analysis starting with the advent of two-level morphology in the early 1980s and culminating in successful commercial applications in the 1990s. It offers some commentary on the relationship, or the lack thereof, between computational and paper-and-pencil linguistics. The final section returns to the semantic issues and their application to currently popular tasks such as textual inference and question answering.
MSC:
68T50 | Natural language processing |
68Q55 | Semantics in the theory of computing |
68-03 | History of computer science |
01A60 | History of mathematics in the 20th century |
References:
[1] | Bennett Winfield S, Computational Linguistics 11 (2) pp 111– (1985) |
[2] | Frege Gottlob, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, pages pp 25– (1892) |
[3] | Geis Michael, Linguistic Inquiry 2 pp 561– (1971) |
[4] | Hamblin Charles L, Foundations of Language 10 pp 41– (1973) |
[5] | DOI: 10.3406/lgge.1981.1884 · doi:10.3406/lgge.1981.1884 |
[6] | Kaplan Ronald M, Computational Linguistics 20 (3) pp 331– (1994) |
[7] | DOI: 10.2307/412084 · doi:10.2307/412084 |
[8] | Karttunen Lauri, Linguistic Inquiry 4 pp 167– (1973) |
[9] | DOI: 10.1515/thli.1974.1.1-3.181 · doi:10.1515/thli.1974.1.1-3.181 |
[10] | DOI: 10.1007/BF00351935 · Zbl 0342.02002 · doi:10.1007/BF00351935 |
[11] | DOI: 10.1007/BF00258436 · doi:10.1007/BF00258436 |
[12] | DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x · Zbl 0243.02002 · doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x |
[13] | DOI: 10.1093/llc/9.2.137 · doi:10.1093/llc/9.2.137 |
[14] | Partee Barbara, Linguistic Inquiry 6 pp 203– (1995) |
[15] | DOI: 10.2307/413238 · doi:10.2307/413238 |
[16] | DOI: 10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479 · doi:10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479 |
[17] | DOI: 10.1093/mind/LXVI.263.385 · doi:10.1093/mind/LXVI.263.385 |
[18] | DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(61)80006-5 · Zbl 0119.13901 · doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(61)80006-5 |
[19] | Soames S., Linguistic Inquiry 13 pp 483– (1982) |
[20] | DOI: 10.1007/BF00262951 · doi:10.1007/BF00262951 |
[21] | DOI: 10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 · doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 |
[22] | Strawson Peter, Theoria 30 pp 320– (1964) |
[23] | DOI: 10.1093/jos/9.4.333 · doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333 |
[24] | DOI: 10.1093/jos/9.4.379 · doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.379 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.